Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T19:06:50.714Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Maternal Effects: On Dennett and Darwins Dangerous Idea - Daniel C. Dennett, Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life. New York: Simon and Schuster (1995), 586 pp.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Peter Godfrey-Smith*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Stanford University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Send requests for reprints to the author, Department of Philosophy, Stanford University, Stanford CA, 94305–2155.

I am grateful to Daniel Dennett, Stephen Downes, Lori Gruen, David Hull, Philip Kitcher, and Kim Sterelny for helpful comments on earlier drafts.

References

Dawkins, Richard (1986), The Blind Watchmaker. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel C. (1987), The Intentional Stance. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, Peter (1993), “Functions: Consensus Without Unity”, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 74: 196208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, Peter (1994), “The Modern History Theory of Functions”, Noûs 28: 344362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, Jim (1997), “Space Race”, Lingua Franca 7 (5): 1920.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel ([1790]1952), Critique of Teleological Judgment. Translated by J. C. Meredith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar