Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-tsvsl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T17:27:10.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kuhn's Evolutionary Epistemology and Its Being Undermined by Inadequate Biological Concepts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Barbara Gabriella Renzi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Kuhn made two attempts at providing an evolutionary analogy for scientific change. The first attempt, in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, is very brief and unstructured; in this article I discuss some of its weaknesses. Alexander Bird takes this attempt more seriously and provides a criticism based on oversimplified evolutionary assumptions. These assumptions prove to be inadequate for the second, more articulate, evolutionary analogy suggested by Kuhn in “The Road since Structure.” I argue, however, that this second Kuhnian attempt is undermined by his inadequate view of biological progress and by his misunderstanding of the concept of ecological niche.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 76 , Issue 2 , April 2009 , pp. 143 - 159
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bird, A. (2000), Thomas Kuhn. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradie, M. (1986), “Assessing Evolutionary Epistemology”, Assessing Evolutionary Epistemology 1:401–459.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T. (1974), “Evolutionary Epistemology”, in Schilpp, P. A. (ed.), The Philosophy of Karl Popper. La Salle, IL: Open Court, 412–463.Google Scholar
Futuyma, D. J. (1998), Evolutionary Biology. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. ([1962] 1970), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1990), “The Road since Structure”, in Fine, A., Forbes, M., and Wessels, L. (eds.), PSA 1990: Proceedings of the 1990 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 2. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, 3–13.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. (1978), “Adaptation”, Adaptation 239:212–228.Google ScholarPubMed
Popper, K. R. (1978), Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach, revised edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Radick, G. (2000), “Two Explanations of Evolutionary Progress”, Two Explanations of Evolutionary Progress 15:475–491.Google Scholar
Sharrock, W., and Read, R. (2002), Kuhn: Philosopher of Scientific Revolution. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar