Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T18:33:28.778Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is Structural Realism Possible?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Stathis Psillos
Stathis Psillos*
Affiliation:
University of Athens
*
†Send requests for reprints to the author, Department of Philosophy & History of Science, University of Athens, 37 John Kennedy Str., 16121, Athens, Greece; email: psillos@phs.uoa.gr.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines in detail two paths that lead to Structural Realism (SR), viz. a substantive philosophical position which asserts that only the structure of the world is knowable. The upward path is any attempt to begin with empiricist premises and reach a sustainable realist position. (It has been advocated by Russell, Weyl, and Maxwell among others.) The downward path is any attempt to start from realist premises and construct a weaker realist position. (It has been recently advocated by Worrall, French, and Ladyman.) This paper unravels and criticizes the metaphysical presuppositions of both paths to SR. It questions its very possibility as a substantive—and viable—realist thesis.

Type
Metaphysics and Methodology of Science
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 68 , Issue S3: No. 3 Supplement: Proceedings of the 2000 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. Part I: Contributed Papers Sep., 2001 , 2001 , pp. S13 - S24
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

Thanks to Theodore Arabatzis, Otavio Bueno, Peter Clark, Craig Callender, Chris Daly, Bill Demopoulos, Igor Douven, John Earman, Steven French, Carl Hoefer, Jeff Ketland, James Ladyman, John Norton, Peter Machamer, Thomas Uebel, and John Worrall for stimulating comments and discussions. Versions of this paper were presented at the annual BSPS conference in Sheffield and at the Center for the Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh.

References

Carnap, Rudolf (1928), The Logical Structure of the World. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Demopoulos, William and Friedman, Michael (1985), “Critical Notice: Bertrand Russell's The Analysis of Matter”, Philosophy of Science 52:621–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, Steven (1999), “Models and Mathematics in Physics”, in Butterfield, Jeremy and Pagonis, Constantine (eds.), From Physics to Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 187–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochberg, Herbert (1994), “Causal Connections, Universals and Russell's Hypothetico-Scientific Realism”, Monist 77:71–92.10.5840/monist19947711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladyman, James (1998), “What is Structural Realism?”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 29:409–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, Grover (1970a), “Theories, Perception and Structural Realism”, in Colodny, Robert (ed.). The Nature and Function of Scientific Theories. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 3–34.Google Scholar
Maxwell, Grover (1970b), “Structural Realism and the Meaning of Theoretical Terms”, in Winokur, S. and Radner, M. (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. IV. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 181–192.Google Scholar
Newman, M.H.A. (1928), “Mr. Russell's ‘Causal Theory of Perception‘”, Mind 37:137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Psillos, Stathis (1999), Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Psillos, Stathis (2000), “The Present State of the Scientific Realism Debate”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51:705–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand (1919), Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand (1927), The Analysis of Matter. London: RKP.Google Scholar
van Fraassen, Bas C. (1980), The Scientific Image. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyl, Hermann (1963), Philosophy of Mathematics and Natural Science. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
Worrall, John (1989), “Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds?”, Dialectica 43:99–124.10.1111/j.1746-8361.1989.tb00933.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar