Article contents
Hypothesis Competition beyond Mutual Exclusivity
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2022
Abstract
Competition between scientific hypotheses is not always a matter of mutual exclusivity. Consistent hypotheses can compete to varying degrees either directly or indirectly via a body of evidence. We motivate and defend a particular account of hypothesis competition by showing how it captures these features. Computer simulations of Bayesian inference are used to highlight the limitations of adopting mutual exclusivity as a simplifying assumption to model scientific reasoning, particularly due to the exclusion of hypotheses that may be true. We end with a case study demonstrating the subtleties involved in hypothesis competition in scientific practice.
- Type
- Evidence and Inference
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association
References
- 11
- Cited by