Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-18T18:47:58.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Francis Bacon's Philosophy of Science: Machina intellectus and Forma indita

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Madeline M. Muntersbjorn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Francis Bacon (1561–1626) wrote that good scientists are not like ants (mindlessly gathering data) or spiders (spinning empty theories). Instead, they are like bees, transforming nature into a nourishing product. This essay examines Bacon's “middle way” by elucidating the means he proposes to turn experience and insight into understanding. The human intellect relies on “machines” to extend perceptual limits, check impulsive imaginations, and reveal nature's latent causal structure, or “forms.” This constructivist interpretation is not intended to supplant inductivist or experimentalist interpretations, but is designed to explicate Bacon's account of science as a collaborative project with several interdependent methodological goals.

Type
History of Philosophy of Science
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 70 , Issue 5: Proceedings of the 2002 Biennial Meeting of The Philosophy of Science Association. Part I: Contributed Papers , December 2003 , pp. 1137 - 1148
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bacon, Francis ([1620] 1994), Novum Organum, Peter Urbach and John Gibson (trans. and eds.). Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis ([1620] 2000), The New Organon. Lisa Jardine and Michael Silverthorne (trans. and eds.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles ([1857] 1979), Little Dorrit, Harvey Peter Sucksmith (ed.). New York: OxfordGoogle Scholar
Farrington, Benjamin (1949), Francis Bacon Philosopher of Industrial Science. New York: Schuman.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, Paul (1993), Against Method. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian (1983), Representing and Intervening; Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas (1977), The Essential Tension. Chicago: University of Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakatos, Imre (1974), “Popper on Demarcation and Induction”, in Schilpp, Paul Arthur (ed.), The Philosophy of Karl Popper, LaSalle, IL: Open Court, 241–273.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno (1990), “Drawing Things Together”, in Lynch, Michael and Woolgar, Steve (eds.), Representation in Scientific Practice. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press, 19–68.Google Scholar
Pérez-Ramos, Antonio (1988), Francis Bacon's Idea of Science and the Maker's Knowledge Tradition. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl R. ([1959] 1992), The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rossi, Paolo (1984), “Ants, Spiders and Epistemologists”, in Fattori, Marta (ed.), Francis Bacon: Terminologia e Fortuna nel XVII Secolo. Rome: Edizioni dell'Ateneo, 245–260.Google Scholar
Schildknect, Christiane (1995), “Experiments with Metaphors: On the Connection between Scientific Method and Literary Form in Francis Bacon”, in Radman, Zdravko (ed.), From a Metaphorical Point of View: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Cognitive Content of Metaphor. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 27–50.Google Scholar
Snyder, Laura J. (1999), “Renovating the Novum Organum: Bacon, Whewell, and Induction”, Renovating the Novum Organum: Bacon, Whewell, and Induction 30 (4): 531–557..Google Scholar
Spedding, James, ed. (1874), The Letters and the Life of Francis Bacon, Vol. 7. London: Longman, Green, Longman, and Roberts.Google Scholar
Urbach, Peter (1987), Francis Bacon's Philosophy of Science: An Account and a Reappraisal. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Vickers, Brian (1992), “Francis Bacon and the Progress of Knowledge”, Francis Bacon and the Progress of Knowledge 53 (3): 495–518..Google Scholar
Whewell, William ([1860] 1971), On the Philosophy of Discovery, New York: Burt Franklin.Google Scholar