Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-06T11:13:38.602Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

For Fundamentalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Carl Hoefer
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper I defend fundamental physical laws from the arguments mounted by Nancy Cartwright in her (1999) book The Dappled World (and other publications). I argue, positively, that we have a good deal of evidence for mathematical laws—not just causal capacities—underlying many natural phenomena. I also argue, negatively, that Cartwright's main arguments unfairly demand that a fundamentalist be a strong reductionist.

Type
Laws and Causation
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 70 , Issue 5: Proceedings of the 2002 Biennial Meeting of The Philosophy of Science Association. Part I: Contributed Papers , December 2003 , pp. 1401 - 1412
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

I would like to thank Craig Callender, John Worrall, Jordi Cat, Paul Teller, Daniel Quesada, and Mauricio Suárez for very helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper. I owe a special debt to Nancy Cartwright, whose extensive comments led to much-needed corrections and deletions.

References

Anderson, Phillip W. (2001), “Science: A ‘Dappled World’ or a ‘Seamless Web’?” (essay review of The Dappled World), Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 32 (3): 487–494..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy (1999), The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy (2000), “Against the Completability of Science”, in Stone, M. W. F. and Wolff, Jonathan (eds.), The Proper Ambition of Science. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Feynman, Richard P. (1965), The Character of Physical Law. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand (1912), “On the Notion of Cause”, in Mysticism and Logic. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar