Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T15:19:33.960Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Empirical Evaluations of Theoretical Explanations of Psychotherapeutic Efficacy: A Reply to John D. Greenwood

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Adolf Grünbaum
Adolf Grünbaum*
Affiliation:
Center for Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh
*
†Send requests for reprints to the author, The Center for Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh, 2510 Cathedral of Learning, Pittsburgh, PA 15260–6125; e-mail: grunbaum+@pitt.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using Grünbaum 1984 and 1993 as a springboard, Greenwood (this issue) claims to have offered several methodologically salubrious and exegetically illuminating theses on empirical evaluations of theoretical explanations of psychotherapeutic efficacy. According to his exegesis of Grünbaum's construction (1984, Ch. 2, Section C; 1993, 184–204) of Freud's “Tally Argument,” that argument bespeaks a rife neglect of the epistemologically-significant distinction between empirical evaluations of the efficacy of psychotherapy and evaluations of theoretical explanations of that efficacy. Greenwood presents a defense of a qualified version of Popper's critique of psychoanalysis against Grünbaum's objections to it (1984, Ch. 1B). Finally, Greenwood offers a clarification of the concept of a “placebo control” investigation, taking issue with Grünbaum's 1993 (84–87, 91–93).

In the present paper, it is argued contra Greenwood that: (1) his purportedly “best” reading of Freud's Tally Argument and of its import founders, (2) the distinction that Greenwood bemoans as being neglected by mental health researchers actually is a commonplace in the literature on treatment-process and therapeutic outcome, (3) Greenwood's defense of Popper's critique of psychoanalysis is an anachronism, and (4) Greenwood's conceptual analysis of placebo controls is nebulous and misconceived.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 63 , Issue 4 , December 1996 , pp. 622 - 641
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bachrach, H. et al. (1991), “On the Efficacy of Psychoanalysis”, Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 39: 871–916.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bergin, A. (1971), “The Evaluation of Therapeutic Outcomes”, in Bergin, A. and Garfield, S. (ed.), Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change: An Empirical Study. New York: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 217–270.Google Scholar
Elkin, I. (1994), “The NIMH Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program: Where We Are and Where We Began”, in Bergin, A. and Garfield, S.L. (ed.), Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change, 4th edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 114–139.Google Scholar
Erwin, E. (1993), “Philosophers on Freudianism: An Examination of Replies to Grünbaum's Foundations“, in Earman, J. et al. (ed.), Philosophical Problems of the Internal and External Worlds: Essays on the Philosophy of Adolf Grünbaum. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Erwin, E. (1996), A Final Accounting, Philosophical and Empirical Issues in Freudian Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Erwin, E. (1996a), “The Evaluation of Psychotherapy: A Reply to Greenwood”, Philosophy of Science 62: 642–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esterson, A. (1996), “Grünbaum's Tally Argument”, History of the Human Sciences 9: 43–57.10.1177/095269519600900103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H. (1952), “The Effects of Psychotherapy: An Evaluation”, Journal of Consulting Psychology 16: 319–324.10.1037/h0063633CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feinstein, A. (1973), “Clinical Biostatistics. XXIV. The Role of Randomization in Sampling, Testing, Allocation, and Credulous Idolatry”, Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 14: 1035–1051.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, S. and Greenberg, R. (1977), The Scientific Credibility of Freud's Theory and Therapy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Frank, J. (1973), Persuasion and Healing (rev. ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Frank, J. (1974), “Therapeutic Components of Psychotherapy”, Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 159: 325–342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freud, S. (1929), “Psychoanalysis: Freudian School”, in Encyclopedia Britannica, 14th Edition. New York, pp. 672–674.Google Scholar
Frank, J. (1953–1974), Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. J. Strachey, et al., trans. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Grünbaum, A. (1980), “Epistemological Liabilities of the Clinical Appraisal of Psychoanalytic Theory”, Noûs 14: 307–385.10.2307/2214964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grünbaum, A. (1983), “Freud's Theory: The Perspective of a Philosopher of Science”, 1982 Presidential Address to the American Philosophical Association (Eastern Division), Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 57: 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grünbaum, A. (1983a), “Retrospective Versus Prospective Testing of Aetiologic Hypotheses in Psychoanalytic Theory”, in Earman, J. (ed.), Testing Scientific Theories, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. X. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 315–347.Google Scholar
Grünbaum, A. (1984), The Foundations of Psychoanalysis: A Philosophical Critique. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Grünbaum, A. (1986), “Précis of The Foundations of Psychoanalysis: A Philosophical Critique”, and Author's Response to 40 Reviewers: “Is Freud's Theory Well-Founded?”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9(2) (June): 217–284.10.1017/S0140525X00022287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grünbaum, A. (1986a), “The Placebo Concept in Medicine & Psychiatry”, Psychological Medicine (England) Vol. 16 (February): 19–38.10.1017/S0033291700002506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grünbaum, A. (1990), “The Psychoanalytic Enterprise in Scientific Perspective”, in Savage, C. (ed.), Scientific Theories, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. XIV. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 41–58.Google Scholar
Grünbaum, A. (1993), Validation in the Clinical Theory of Psychoanalysis: A Study in the Philosophy of Psychoanalysis. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Grünbaum, A. (1996), “Is Psychoanalysis Viable?”, in O'Donohue, W. and Kitchener, R. (ed.), The Philosophy of Psychology. London: Sage Publishing, pp. 282–291.Google Scholar
Grünbaum, A. (1997, forthcoming), “Critique of Freud's Neurobiological and Psychoanalytic Dream Theories”.Google Scholar
Grünbaum, A. (1997a), “One Hundred Years of Psychoanalytic Theory and Therapy”, in Carrier, M. and Machamer, P. (ed.), Mindscapes. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 323–360.10.2307/j.ctt5vkgzz.24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, M. and Hill, C. (1994), “Assessing Psychotherapy Outcomes and Processes”, in Bergin, A. and Garfield, S. L., (ed.), Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change, 4th edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 72–113.Google Scholar
Meltzoff, J. and Kornreich, M. (1970), Research in Psychotherapy. New York: Atherton Press.Google Scholar
Popper, K. (1983), Realism and the Aim of Science. III, W. Bartley (ed.). Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar