Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T02:37:12.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quantum Theoretical Concepts of Measurement: Part II

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

James L. Park
James L. Park*
Affiliation:
Washington State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This portion of the essay concludes a two-part paper, Part I of which appeared in an earlier issue of this Journal. Part II begins with a careful study of the quantum description of real experiments in order to motivate a proposal that two distinct quantum theoretical measurement constructs should be recognized, both of which must be distinguished from the concept of preparation. The different epistemological roles of these concepts are compared and explained. It is then concluded that the only possible type of “quantum measurement theory” is one of little metaphysical interest and that quantum measurement seems problematical only when viewed from an overly narrow classical perspective.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 35 , Issue 4 , December 1968 , pp. 389 - 411
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Part 1 of this article appears in the immediately preceding issue of Philosophy of Science, Vol. 35, No. 3 (September, 1968).

References

REFERENCES

[1] Bridgman, P. W., The Logic of Modern Physics, Macmillan, 1928.Google Scholar
[2] de Broglie, L., The Current Interpretation of Wave Mechanics, Elsevier, 1964, p. 4.Google Scholar
[3] Einstein, A., “Geometry and Experience,” Readings in the Philosophy of Science (eds. Feigl, H. and Brodbeck, M.), Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1953, p. 189.Google Scholar
[4] Everett, H. III, Review of Modern Physics, vol. 29, 1950, p. 454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Gerlach, W., and Stern, O., Zeitschrift für Physik, vol. 9, 1922, p. 349, in The World of the Atom (translated by H. A. Boorse and L. Motz (eds.)), Basic Books, 1966, p. 936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Gottfried, K., Quantum Mechanics, Benjamin, 1966, 165–189.Google Scholar
[7] Groenewold, H. J., Nuclear Physics, vol. 57, 1964, p. 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Heisenberg, W., in Niels Bohr and the Development of Physics (ed. Pauli, W.), Pergamon, 1955, p. 227.Google Scholar
[9] Landé, A., New Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Margenau, H., The Nature of Physical Reality, McGraw-Hill, 1950.Google Scholar
[11] Margenau, H., Philosophy of Science, vol. 2, 1935, p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Margenau, H., and Park, J. L., in Delaware Seminar on the Foundations of Physics (ed. Bunge, M.), Springer-Verlag, 1967.Google Scholar
[13] Northrop, F. S. C., The Logic of the Sciences and the Humanities, Macmillan, 1947.Google Scholar
[14] Phipps, T. E., and Taylor, J. B., Physical Review, vol. 29, 1927, p. 309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15] Schrödinger, E., Statistical Thermodynamics, Cambridge, 1952, p. 90.Google Scholar
[16] Schweber, S. S., An Introduction to Relativistic Quantum Field Theory, Row Peterson, 1961, p. 6.Google Scholar
[17] Schwinger, J., Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, vol. 46, 1960, p. 570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18] Stallo, J. B., The Concepts and Theories of Modern Physics, Appleton, 1881, and Harvard, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar