Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T16:20:47.160Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Language and Culture Areas: A Note on Method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

William E. Bittle
William E. Bittle*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, The University of Oklahoma
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The Problem. The purpose of this paper is twofold. One aim is to examine briefly the criteria basic to the notions of the culture area and the language area; the second is to indicate a method which would allow for the construction of systems which could profitably be compared and held correlate in any problem involving, on the historical level, the development and diffusion of cultural and linguistic patterns, and, on the synchronic level, the precise nature of that complex of human behavior patterns, linguistic and non-linguistic, which is characteristic of man in society.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , October 1953 , pp. 247 - 256
Copyright
Copyright © 1953, The Williams & Wilkins Company

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

I am indebted to the Rockefeller Foundation's Interdepartmental Study on Language and Symbolism, University of Michigan, for the time made available to me for the preparation of this paper.

References

1. Carroll, John B., et al., Report and Recommendations of the Interdisciplinary Summer Seminar in Psychology and Linguistics. Cornell University (mimeographed), 1951.Google Scholar
2. Hoijer, Harry, “Cultural Implications of Some Navaho Linguistic Categories,” Language, XXVII, 1951, pp. 111–120.10.2307/410424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Kluckhohn, Clyde, “Patterning as Exemplified in Navaho Culture,” Language, Culture and Personality, Leslie Spier (ed.), 1941, pp. 109–130.Google Scholar
4. Opler, M. E., “Themes as Dynamic Forces in Culture,” American Journal of Sociology, LI, 1945, pp. 198–206.10.1086/219787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Opler, M. E., “An Application of the Theory of Themes in Culture,” Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, XXXVI, 1946, pp. 137–165.Google Scholar
6. Opler, M. E., “Some Recently Developed Concepts Relating to Culture,” Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, IV, 1948, pp. 107–122.10.1086/soutjanth.4.2.3628706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Sapir, Edward, “Language and Environment,” American Anthropologist, XIV, 1912, pp. 226–242.10.1525/aa.1912.14.2.02a00020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Sapir, Edward, Language. Harcourt, Brace and Co., Inc. 1921.Google Scholar
9. Swadesh, M., “Diffusional Cumulation and Archaic Residue as Historical Explanations,” Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, VII, 1951, pp. 1–21.10.1086/soutjanth.7.1.3628647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Voegelin, C. F., “Linguistics Without Meaning and Culture Without Words,” Word, V, 1949, pp. 36–42.10.1080/00437956.1949.11659350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Whorf, Benjamin L., “The Relation of Habitual Thought and Behavior to Language,” Language, Culture and Personality, Leslie Spier (ed.), 1941, pp. 75–93.Google Scholar