Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Lee, Carole J.
2013.
THE LIMITED EFFECTIVENESS OF PRESTIGE AS AN INTERVENTION ON THE HEALTH OF MEDICAL JOURNAL PUBLICATIONS.
Episteme,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 4,
p.
387.
Boudreau, Kevin
Guinan, Eva
Lakhani, Karim R.
and
Riedl, Christoph
2014.
Looking Across and Looking Beyond the Knowledge Frontier: Intellectual Distance and Resource Allocation in Science.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Watkins, Marley W.
and
Chan-Park, Christina Y.
2015.
The research impact of school psychology faculty.
Journal of School Psychology,
Vol. 53,
Issue. 3,
p.
231.
Lee, Carole J.
2015.
Commensuration Bias in Peer Review.
Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 82,
Issue. 5,
p.
1272.
Boudreau, Kevin J.
Guinan, Eva C.
Lakhani, Karim R.
and
Riedl, Christoph
2016.
Looking Across and Looking Beyond the Knowledge Frontier: Intellectual Distance, Novelty, and Resource Allocation in Science.
Management Science,
Vol. 62,
Issue. 10,
p.
2765.
Derrick, Gemma E.
and
Samuel, Gabrielle N.
2016.
The Evaluation Scale: Exploring Decisions About Societal Impact in Peer Review Panels.
Minerva,
Vol. 54,
Issue. 1,
p.
75.
Boudreau, Kevin J.
and
Lakhani, Karim R.
2016.
Innovation Experiments: Researching Technical Advance, Knowledge Production, and the Design of Supporting Institutions.
Innovation Policy and the Economy,
Vol. 16,
Issue. ,
p.
135.
Andersen, Line Edslev
2017.
On the Nature and Role of Peer Review in Mathematics.
Accountability in Research,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 3,
p.
177.
Jukola, Saana
2017.
A Social Epistemological Inquiry into Biases in Journal Peer Review.
Perspectives on Science,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 1,
p.
124.
Casnici, Niccolò
Grimaldo, Francisco
Gilbert, Nigel
and
Squazzoni, Flaminio
2017.
Attitudes of referees in a multidisciplinary journal: An empirical analysis.
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,
Vol. 68,
Issue. 7,
p.
1763.
Teplitskiy, Misha
Acuna, Daniel
Elamrani-Raoult, Aïda
Körding, Konrad
and
Evans, James
2018.
The sociology of scientific validity: How professional networks shape judgement in peer review.
Research Policy,
Vol. 47,
Issue. 9,
p.
1825.
Derrick, Gemma
2018.
The Evaluators’ Eye.
p.
1.
Strauss, Pat
2019.
Shakespeare and the English Poets: The Influence of Native Speaking English Reviewers on the Acceptance of Journal Articles.
Publications,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 1,
p.
20.
Sandu, Antonio
2019.
Ethics in Research Practice and Innovation.
p.
1.
Lee, Carole J.
2020.
The Reference Class Problem for Credit Valuation in Science.
Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 87,
Issue. 5,
p.
1026.
Erosheva, Elena A.
Grant, Sheridan
Chen, Mei-Ching
Lindner, Mark D.
Nakamura, Richard K.
and
Lee, Carole J.
2020.
NIH peer review: Criterion scores completely account for racial disparities in overall impact scores.
Science Advances,
Vol. 6,
Issue. 23,
Kim, Byeong Je
Jeong, Seunghoo
and
Chung, Ji-Bum
2021.
Research trends in vulnerability studies from 2000 to 2019: Findings from a bibliometric analysis.
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction,
Vol. 56,
Issue. ,
p.
102141.
Heesen, Remco
and
Bright, Liam Kofi
2021.
Is Peer Review a Good Idea?.
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 72,
Issue. 3,
p.
635.
Erosheva, Elena A.
Martinková, Patrícia
and
Lee, Carole J.
2021.
When Zero May Not Be Zero: A Cautionary Note on the Use of Inter-Rater Reliability in Evaluating Grant Peer Review.
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society,
Vol. 184,
Issue. 3,
p.
904.
Goldhaber, Dan
Grout, Cyrus
Wolff, Malcolm
and
Martinková, Patrícia
2021.
Evidence on the Dimensionality and Reliability of Professional References’ Ratings of Teacher Applicants.
Economics of Education Review,
Vol. 83,
Issue. ,
p.
102130.