Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T00:29:27.937Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hydrodynamics versus Molecular Dynamics: Intertheory Relations in Condensed Matter Physics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Robert W. Batterman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper considers the relationship between continuum hydrodynamics and discrete molecular dynamics in the context of explaining the behavior of breaking droplets. It is argued that the idealization of a fluid as a continuum is actually essential for a full explanation of the drop breaking phenomenon and that, therefore, the less “fundamental,” emergent hydrodynamical theory plays an ineliminable role in our understanding.

Type
Reduction, Emergence, and Condensed Matter Physics
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 73 , Issue 5: Proceedings of the 2004 Biennial Meeting of The Philosophy of Science Association. Part II: Symposia Papers. Edited by Miriam Solomon , December 2006 , pp. 888 - 904
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

I would like to thank Leo Kadanoff and Sidney Nagel for helpful discussions.

References

Barenblatt, Grigory I. (2003), Scaling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batterman, Robert W. (2005), “Critical Phenomena and Breaking Drops: Infinite Idealizations in Physics,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 36, 225–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doshi, Pankaj, Cohen, Itai, Zhang, Wendy W., Siegel, Michael, Howell, Peter, Basaran, Osman A., and Nagel, Sidney R. (2003), “Persistence of Memory in Drop Breakup: The Breakdown of Universality,” Science 302 (November): 1185–1188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eggers, Jens (1995), “Theory of Drop Formation,” Physics of Fluids 7 (5): 941–953..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggers, Jens (1997), “Nonlinear Dynamics and Breakup of Free-Surface Flows,” Reviews of Modern Physics 69 (3): 865–929..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggers, Jens (2002), “Dynamics of Liquid Nanojets,” Physical Review Letters 89 (8): 084502–1.–084502-4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moffatt, H. K. (2000), “Euler’s Disk and Its Finite-Time Singularity,” Nature 404 (April): 833–844.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moseler, Michael, and Landman, Uzi (2000), “Formation, Stability, and Breakup of Nanojets,” Science 289 (August): 1165–1169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagel, Sidney R. (2001), “Shadows and Ephemera,” Critical Inquiry 28 (1): 23–39..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, David R. (2002), Defects and Geometry in Condensed Matter Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shi, X. D., Brenner, Michael P., and Nagel, Sidney R. (1994), “A Cascade Structure in a Drop Falling from a Faucet,” Science 265 (5169): 219–222..CrossRefGoogle Scholar