Article contents
Discussion: A Note on Realism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 April 2022
Abstract
In a recent article (1980) G. H. Merrill has defended realism against an argument devised by Hilary Putnam. My first aim is to show that Merrill's defence is inadequate. I shall also argue that the proper conclusion of Putnam's argument is somewhat different from the conclusion Putnam himself offers.
- Type
- Discussion
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association
Footnotes
I am grateful to the referees of this Journal for their comments.
References
REFERENCES
- 2
- Cited by