Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T19:55:35.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

American Cities and American Political Science—a Look at Thick Injustice

A Discussion of Clarissa Rile Hayward and Todd Swanstrom's Justice and the American Metropolis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2012

Kent E. Portney
Affiliation:
Tufts University

Abstract

The back cover of Clarissa Rile Hayward and Todd Swanstrom's Justice and the American Metropolis concisely lays out a central challenge of contemporary politics: “Today's American cities and suburbs are the sites of ‘thick injustice’—unjust power relations that are deeply and densely concentrated as well as opaque and seemingly intractable. Thick injustice is hard to see, to assign responsibility for, and to change.” The fact that the topic of “urban politics” is not a major theme of political science scholarship both reflects and exacerbates this challenge. And so we have decided to invite a diverse group of social scientists to discuss the book in light of the very big question that it poses: How do American cities look when assessed in terms of their “justice” (or “injustice”), and how might they look if they were assessed in these terms more seriously? In considering this question, discussants have also been asked to consider a related question: How does American political science look when assessed in terms of the extent to which it takes the question of urban justice and injustice seriously?—Jeffrey C. Isaac, Editor

Type
Review Symposium: American Cities and American Political Science—A Look at Thick Injustice
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Budd, William, Lovrich, Nicholas Jr., Pierce, John C., and Chamberlain, Barbara. 2008. “Cultural Sources of Variations in US Urban Sustainability Attributes.” Cities 25(5): 257–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feiock, Richard C., and Bae, Jungah. 2011. “Politics, Institutions, and Entrepreneurship: City Decisions Leading to Inventoried Greenhouse Gas Emissions.” Carbon Management 2(4): 443–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florida, Richard. 2002. The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Florida, Richard. 2005. Cities and the Creative Class. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubell, Mark, Feiock, Richard, and de la Cruz, Edgar Ramirez. 2005. “Political Institutions and Conservation by Local Governments.” Urban Affairs Review 40(6): 706–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearsall, Hamil, and Pierce, Joseph. 2010. “Urban Sustainability and Environmental Justice: Evaluating the Linkages in Public Planning/Policy Discourse.” Local Environment 15(6): 569–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portney, Kent E. 2008. “Education and Smart Growth Policies in U.S. Cities: A Response to Lenahan O'Connell.” Social Science Quarterly 89(5): 1378–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portney, Kent E., and Berry, Jeffrey M.. 2010. “Participation and the Pursuit of Sustainability in U.S. Cities.” Urban Affairs Review 4(1): 119–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portney, Kent E., and Cuttler, Zachary. 2010. “The Local Nonprofit Sector and the Pursuit of Sustainability in American Cities: A Preliminary Exploration.” Local Environment 15(4): 323–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saha, Devashree, and Paterson, Robert G.. 2008. “Local Government Efforts to Promote the ‘Three Es’ of Sustainable Development: Survey in Medium to Large Cities in the United States.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 28(1): 2137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, Kee. 2002. “Linking Local Sustainability Initiatives with Environmental Justice.” Local Environment 7(1): 3547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeemering, Eric S. 2009. “What Does Sustainability Mean to City Officials?Urban Affairs Review 45(2): 247–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar