Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-559fc8cf4f-d5zgf Total loading time: 0.323 Render date: 2021-03-05T11:44:33.906Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Is It Gender, Religiosity or Both? A Role Congruity Theory of Candidate Electability in Transitional Tunisia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2015

Abstract

Do voters regard male and female candidates equally? Does apparent religiosity of candidates help or hurt their electoral chances? Where biases exist, what explains them? We present a novel explanation of political bias, drawing from role congruity theory. It posits that political contexts shape citizens' perceptions of qualities that make a “capable leader,” which subsequently drives their willingness to vote for candidates. Evidence from a survey experiment embedded in the 2012 Tunisian Post-Election Survey demonstrates that this theory explains biases based on gender and religiosity better than dominant modernization and social identity theories. Moreover, these mechanisms are also likely to drive political biases related to other features and in other countries. This has important implications for policymakers aiming to reduce political biases in Tunisia, the MENA, or globally. It should encourage them to pay careful attention to stereotyped traits of underrepresented groups and successful leaders, and to use institutional solutions (e.g., electoral quotas) to shape expectations about underrepresented groups and leadership.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Angrist, Michele. 2012. “War, Resisting the West, and Women’s Labor: Toward an Understanding of Arab Exceptionalism.” Politics and Gender 8(1): 5182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arceneaux, Kevin. 2001. “The ‘Gender Gap’ in State Legislative Representation: New Data to Tackle an Old Question.” Political Research Quarterly 54(1): 143160.Google Scholar
Bauer, Nichole M. 2013. “Rethinking Stereotype Reliance.” Politics and the Life Sciences 32(1): 2242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beaman, Lori, Chattopadhyay, Raghabendra, Duflo, Esther, Pande, Rohini, and Topalova, Petia. 2009. “Powerful Women: Does Exposure Reduce Bias?Journal of Quarterly Economics 124(4): 1497–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaman, Lori, Pande, Rohini, and Cirone, Alexandra. 2012. “Politics as a Male Domain and Empowerment in India.” In The Impact of Gender Quotas, ed. Franceschet, Susan, Krook, Mona Lena, and Piscopo, Jennifer M.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benstead, Lindsay J. 2011. “Do Gender Quotas Affect Popular Support for Women as Good Political Leaders? A Cross-National Study of Gender Quotas and Political Attitudes in the Muslim World.” Presented at “Beyond the Numbers: The Effects of Electoral Gender Quotas,” Washington University in St. Louis, MO, May 12–14, 2011.
Benstead, Lindsay J. 2014a. “Effects of Interviewer-Respondent Gender Interaction on Attitudes toward Women and Politics: Findings from Morocco.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 26(3): 369383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benstead, Lindsay J. 2014b. “Does Interviewer Dress Affect Survey Responses? Evidence from Morocco.” Politics & Religion. Available at http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=9310564&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S1755048314000455, accessed October 12, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benstead, Lindsay, Lust, Ellen, Malouche, Dhafer, Soltan, Gamal, and Wichmann, Jakob. 2013. “Islamists Aren’t the Obstacle: How to Build Democracy in Egypt and Tunisia.” Foreign Affairs. Available at http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/138940/lindsay-benstead-ellen-m-lust-dhafer-malouche-gamal-soltan-and-j/islamists-arent-the-obstacle, accessed February 14, 2013.Google Scholar
Blaydes, Lisa, and Gillum, Rachel M.. 2013. “Religiosity-of-Interviewer Effects: Assessing the Impact of Veiled Enumerators on Survey Response in Egypt.” Politics and Religion 6: 459–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brand, Laurie A. 1998.Women, the State, and Political Liberalization: Middle Eastern and North African Experiences. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Brewer, Marilynn B. 1979. “Ingroup Bias in the Minimal Intergroup Situation: A Cognitive-Motivational Analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 86(March): 307–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, Nancy, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Verba, Sidney. 2001. The Private Roots of Public Action: Gender, Equality, and Political Participation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Calfano, Brian R., and Djupe, Paul A.. 2011. “Not in His Image: The Moderating Effect of Gender on Religious Appeals.” Politics and Religion 4(2): 338–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charrad, Mounira. 1998. “Cultural Diversity within Islam: Veils and Laws in Tunisia.” In Women in Muslim Societies: Diversity within Unity, ed. Bodman, H.L. and Tohidi, N.. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner.Google Scholar
Charrad, Mounira. 2000. “Becoming a Citizen: Lineage versus Individual in Tunisia and Morocco.” In Gender and Citizenship in the Middle East, ed. Joseph, Suad. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Charrad, Mounira. 2001. States and Women's Rights: The Making of Postcolonial Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Charrad, Mounira. 2011. “Gender in the Middle East: Islam, State, Agency.” Annual Review of Sociology 37(1): 417–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciftci, Sabri. 2010. “Modernization, Islam, or Social Capital: What Explains Attitudes toward Democracy in the Muslim World?Comparative Political Studies 43(11): 1442–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, Mick. 2008. “Changing Attitudes toward the Male Breadwinner, Female Homemaker Model,” Social Forces 87(1): 299323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demirgüç-Kunt, Asli, Klapper, Leora and Singer, Dorothe. 2013. “Financial Inclusion and Legal Discrimination against Women: Evidence from Developing Economies.” About Finance blog, World Bank. Available at http://blogs.worldbank.org/allaboutfinance/financial-inclusion-and-legal-discrimination-against-women-evidence-developing-economies , accessed August 5, 2014.
Deutsch, Francine M., LeBaron, Dorothy, and Fryer, Maury March. 1987. “What Is in a Smile?Psychology of Women Quarterly 11(3): 341–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, Karl. 1971. “Social Mobilization and Political Development.” In Political Development and Social Change, ed. Finkle, Jason and Gable, Richard. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Diehl, Claudia, Koening, Mattias, and Ruckdeschel, Kerstin. 2009. “Religiosity and Gender Equality: Comparing Natives and Muslim Migrants in Germany.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 32(2): 278301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 1998. “Voting for Women in the ‘Year of the Woman.’American Journal of Political Science 42(1): 272–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 2004a. “The Impact of Candidate Sex on Evaluations of Candidates for the U.S. House of Representatives.” Social Science Quarterly 85(1): 206–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 2004b. Voting for Women: How the Public Evaluates Women Candidates. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 2010. “The Impact of Gender Stereotyped Evaluations on Support for Women Candidates.” Political Behavior 32(1): 6988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, Alice H. 1987. Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-Role Interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Eagly, Alice H., and Carli, Linda. 2007. Through the Labyrinth: The Truth about How Women become Leaders. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Eagly, Alice H., and Karau, Steven J.. 2002. “Role Congruity Theory of Prejudice toward Female Leaders.” Psychological Review 109(3): 573–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eagly, Alice H., Makhijani, Mona, and Klonsky, Bruce G.. 1992. “Gender and the Evaluation of Leaders: A Meta-Analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 112(3): 557–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, Alice H., and Mladinic, Antonio. 1989. “Gender Stereotypes and Attitudes toward Women and Men.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 15(4): 543–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, Steven. M. 2002. “Islam and Authoritarianism.” World Politics 55(1): 437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Richard L., and Lawless, Jennifer L.. 2004. “Entering the Arena? Gender and the Decision to Run for Office.” American Journal of Political Science 48(2): 264–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goulding, Kristine. 2010. “The Quandary of Gender Quotas in Tunisia: Representations and Perceptions at the Local Level.” Center of Arab Women for Training and Research (CAWTAR)- United Nations International Research and Training Institute for the Advancement of Women (UN-INSTRAW). Tunis, Tunisia.
Higgle, Ellen D. B., Miller, Penny M., Shields, Todd G., and Johnson, Mitzi M. S.. 1997. “Gender Stereotypes and Decision Context in the Evaluation of Political Candidates.” Women & Politics 17(3): 6988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Melanie M. 2013. “The Intersection of Gender and Minority Status in National Legislatures: The Minority Women Legislative Index.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 38(4): 489516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1989. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Norris, Pippa. 2003a. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change around the World. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Norris, Pippa. 2003b. “The True Clash of Civilizations.” Foreign Policy 135: 6270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Kim Fridkin. 1996. The Political Consequences of Being a Woman: How Stereotypes Influence the Conduct and Consequences of Political Campaigns. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, Sania. 2010a. “Hard-won Progress and a Long Road Ahead: Women’s Rights in the Middle East and North Africa.” Women’s Rights in the Middle East and North Africa. Washington, DC: Freedom House.Google Scholar
Kelly, Sania. 2010b. “Recent Gains and New Opportunities for Women’s Rights in the Gulf Arab States.” Women’s Rights in the Middle East and North Africa: Gulf Edition. Washington, DC: Freedom House.Google Scholar
Koch, Jeffrey W. 2000. “Do Citizens Apply Gender Stereotypes to Infer Candidates' Ideological Orientations?Journal of Politics 62(2): 414–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konad, Alison, and Cannings, Kathy. 1997. “The Effects of Gender Role Congruence and Statistical Discrimination on Managerial Advancement.” Human Relations 50(10): 1305–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La France, Marianne, Hecht, Marvin A., Paluck, Elizabeth Levy. 2003. “The Contingent Smile: A Meta-Analysis of Sex Differences in Smiling.” Psychological Bulletin 129(2): 305–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer. 2004. “Women, War, and Winning Elections: Gender Stereotyping in the Post-September 11th Era.” Political Research Quarterly 57(3): 479–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L., and Fox, Richard Logan. 2010. It Still Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don't Run for Office. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Daniel. 1958. The Passing of Traditional Society: Modernizing the Middle East. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1959. “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy.” American Political Science Review 53(1): 69105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahmood, Saba. 2005. Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Masoud, Tarek. 2014. Counting Islam: Religion, Class and Election. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnaughy, Corrine M., White, Ismail K., Leal, David L., and Casellas, Jason P.. 2010. “A Latino on the Ballot: Explaining Coethnic Voting among Latinos and the Response of White Americans.” Journal of Politics 72(4): 1199–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Monika L. 1997. “Voting Cues in Low-Information Elections: Candidate Gender as a Social Information Variable in Contemporary United States Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 41(1): 270–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Monika L. 1998. “Race and Gender Cues in Low-Information Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 51(4): 895918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Monika L. 2007. “Voting for Catholic Candidates: The Evolution of a Stereotype.” Social Science Quarterly 88(4): 953–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moghadam, Valentine M. 2003. Modernizing Women Gender and Social Change in the Middle East. 2nd ed. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Moghadam, Valentine M. 2004. “Towards Gender equality in the Arab/Middle East Region: Islam, Culture and Feminist Activism.”United Nations Development Program. Available at http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/towards-gender-equality-arabmiddle-east-region, accessed August 5, 2014.
Norrander, Barbara and Wilcox, Clyde. 2009. “The Gender Gap in Ideology.” Political Behavior 30(4): 503523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2009. “Why Do Arab States Lag the World in Gender Equality?” HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series RWP09-020, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
Olmsted, Jennifer. 2002. “Assessing the Impact of Religion on Gender Status.” Feminist Economics 8(3): 99111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otto, Emma, Abrosio, Fabiana Follado, and Hoshino, R. L.. 1996. “Reading a Smiling Face: Messages Conveyed by Various Forms of Smiling.” Perceptual and Motor Skills 82: 1111–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritter, Barbara A., and Yoder, Janice D.. 2004. “Gender Differences in Leader Emergence Persist Even for Dominant Women: An Updated Confirmation of Role Congruity Theory.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 28: 187–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizzo, Helen, Abdel-Latif, Abdel-Hamid, and Meyer, Katherine. 2007. “The Relationship between Gender Equality and Democracy: A Comparison of Arab versus Non-Arab Muslim Societies.” Sociology 41(6): 1151–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Michael. 2008. “Oil, Islam and Women.” American Political Science Review 102(1): 107–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudman, Laurie A., and Glick, Peter. 2008. The Social Psychology of Gender: How Power and Intimacy Shape Gender Relations. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Sabbagh, Amal. 2005. “Case Study—The Arab States: enhancing Women’s Political Participation.” In Women in Parliament: Beyond Numbers, ed. Ballington, Julie and Karam, Azza. Stockholm: IDEA.Google Scholar
Schneider, Bill. 2013. “Egypt: Elections Do Not Make a Democracy.” Reuters., July 8, 2013. Available at http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2013/07/07/egypt-elections-do-not-make-a-democracy/, accessed August 5, 2014.
Soneshine, Tara. 2013. “Women in a Changing Middle East.” Address to the Brookings Institution. Available at http://www.brookings.edu/∼/media/events/2013/4/04%20women%20middle%20east/20130404_women_middle_east_transcript.pdf ,accessed August 5, 2014.
Tajfel, Henri. 1978. Differentiation between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tamanna, Nowrin. 2008Personal Status Laws in Morocco and Tunisia: A Comparative Exploration of the Possibilities for Equality-Enhancing Reform in Bangladesh.” Feminist Legal Studies 16(3): 323–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tessler, Mark, and Gao, Eleanor. 2008. “Democracy and the Political Culture Orientations of Ordinary Citizens: A Typology for the Arab World and Beyond.” International Social Science Journal 59(192): 197207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). 2002. Arab Human Development Report. Available at http://www.arab-hdr.org/publications/other/ahdr/ahdr2002e.pdf, accessed August 5, 2014.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). 2005. Human Development Report. Available at http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/reports/266/hdr05_complete.pdf, accessed August 5, 2014.
UN Women. 2013. UN WOMEN for Arab States & the Committee on Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW Committee) Regional Consultation for the Proposed General Recommendation on Women Human Rights in Situations of Conflict and Post Conflict contexts. Available at http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/CEDAW/Womenconflictsituations/RegionalConsultationAmmanJan2013.pdf, accessed August 5, 2014.
Verba, Sidney, Burns, Nancy, and Schlozman, Kay Lehman. 1997. “Knowing and Caring about Politics: Gender and Political Engagement.” Journal of Politics 59(4): 1051–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. 2012. “Gender Differences in Employment and Why They Matter.” World Development Report 2012: Gender, Equality and Development., Washington, DC: World Bank. Available at http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTWDR2012/Resources/7778105-1299699968583/7786210-1315936222006/chapter-5.pdf, accessed August 5, 2014.
World Economic Forum. 2013. Global Gender Gap Report 2013. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum. Available at http://www.weforum.org/reports/global-gender-gap-report-2013, accessed August 5, 2013.

Benstead Supplementary Material

Appendix

File 275 KB

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 126
Total number of PDF views: 653 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 5th March 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Is It Gender, Religiosity or Both? A Role Congruity Theory of Candidate Electability in Transitional Tunisia
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Is It Gender, Religiosity or Both? A Role Congruity Theory of Candidate Electability in Transitional Tunisia
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Is It Gender, Religiosity or Both? A Role Congruity Theory of Candidate Electability in Transitional Tunisia
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *