Skip to main content Accessibility help
Review process

This journal uses a double-anonymised model of peer review. Neither author nor reviewers know the identity of each other. 

After initial editorial assessment, submissions are double-blind peer-reviewed by a minimum of two independent, anonymous expert referees and recommendations made to the Editor-in-Chief for a decision. Find out more about what to expect during peer review here

All research articles in the journal are peer-reviewed. No person is permitted to take any role in the peer-review of a paper in which they have an interest, defined as follows: fees or grants from, employment by, consultancy for, shared ownership in, or any close relationship with, an organisation whose interests, financial or otherwise, may be affected by the publication of the paper.