Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Towards a neuroscience-based theory of personality: within-subjects dissociation of human brain activity during pursuit and goal conflict

  • Adam M. Perkins (a1), Rebecca Strawbridge (a1), Danilo Arnone (a1) (a2) (a3), Steven C. R. Williams (a4), David Gasston (a4), Anthony J. Cleare (a1) (a5), Owen O’Daly (a4), Veena Kumari (a6), Ulrich Ettinger (a7) and Philip J. Corr (a8)...

Abstract

As demonstrated by neuroimaging data, the human brain contains systems that control responses to threat. The revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of personality predicts that individual differences in the reactivity of these brain systems produce anxiety and fear-related personality traits. Here we discuss some of the challenges in testing this theory and, as an example, present a pilot study that aimed to dissociate brain activity during pursuit by threat and goal conflict. We did this by translating the Mouse Defense Test Battery for human fMRI use. In this version, dubbed the Joystick Operated Runway Task (JORT), we repeatedly exposed 24 participants to pursuit and goal conflict, with and without threat of electric shock. The runway design of JORT allowed the effect of threat distance on brain activation to be evaluated independently of context. Goal conflict plus threat of electric shock caused deactivation in a network of brain areas that included the fusiform and middle temporal gyri, as well as the default mode network core, including medial frontal regions, precuneus and posterior cingulate gyrus, and laterally the inferior parietal and angular gyri. Consistent with earlier research, we also found that imminent threat activated the midbrain and that this effect was significantly stronger during the simple pursuit condition than during goal conflict. Also consistent with earlier research, we found significantly greater hippocampal activation during goal conflict than pursuit by imminent threat. In conclusion, our results contribute knowledge to theories linking anxiety disorders to altered functioning in defensive brain systems and also highlight challenges in this research domain.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Towards a neuroscience-based theory of personality: within-subjects dissociation of human brain activity during pursuit and goal conflict
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Towards a neuroscience-based theory of personality: within-subjects dissociation of human brain activity during pursuit and goal conflict
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Towards a neuroscience-based theory of personality: within-subjects dissociation of human brain activity during pursuit and goal conflict
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Corresponding author

Author for correspondence: Adam M. Perkins, Email: adam.perkins@kcl.ac.uk

References

Hide All
Bach, D. R., Guitart-Masip, M., Packard, P. A., Miró, J., Falip, M., Fuentemilla, L., & Dolan, R. J. (2014). Human hippocampus arbitrates approach-avoidance conflict. Current Biology, 24, 541547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.01.046
Bartram, D., & Dale, H. C. A. (1982). The Eysenck personality inventory as a selection test for military pilots. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 55, 287296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1982.tb00102.x
Blanchard, R. J., & Blanchard, D. C. (1989). Attack and defense in rodents as ethoexperimental models for the study of emotion. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 13, S3S14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-5846(89)90105-X
Borges, V. F., Ferrer-Rosa, N. M., Juruena, M. F., & Estanislau, C. (2018). Recognition of a response to potential threat: Evidence for a facial expression of anxiety? Psychology & Neuroscience, 11, 18. http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/pne0000116
Claridge, G., & Davis, C. (2001). What’s the use of neuroticism? Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 383400. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00144-6
Coen, S. J., Kano, M., Farmer, A. D., Kumari, V., Giampietro, V., Brammer, M., … Aziz, Q. (2011). Neuroticism influences brain activity during the experience of visceral pain. Gastroenterology, 141, 909917. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2011.06.008
Corr, P. J., & Perkins, A. M. (2006). The role of theory in the psychophysiology of personality: From Ivan Pavlov to Jeffrey Gray. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 62, 367376. https://doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.01.005
De Moor, M. H., Van Den Berg, S. M., Verweij, K. J., Krueger, R. F., Luciano, M., Vasquez, A. A., … Gordon, S. D. (2015). Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for neuroticism, and the polygenic association with major depressive disorder. JAMA Psychiatry, 72, 642650. https://doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.0554
Eysenck, H. J. (1967). The biological basis of personality. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1991). Manual of Eysenck Personality Scales (EPS adult): Comprising the EPQ-Revised (EPQ-R), EPQ-R short scale, Impulsiveness (IVE) questionnaire. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
Gray, J. A. (1976). The behavioural inhibition system: A possible substrate for anxiety. In Feldman, M. P., & Broadhurst, A. M. (Eds.), Theoretical and experimental bases of the behavior therapies (pp. 341). London: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Gray, J. A., & McNaughton, N. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septohippocampal system (2nd ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Griebel, G., Perrault, G., & Sanger, D. J. (1998). Characterization of the behavioral profile of the non-peptide CRF receptor antagonist CP-154, 526 in anxiety models in rodents Comparison with diazepam and buspirone. Psychopharmacology, 138, 5566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002130050645
Griebel, G., Sanger, D. J., & Perrault, G. (1997). Genetic differences in the mouse defense test battery. Aggressive Behavior, 23, 1931. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1997)23:1%3C19::AID-AB3%3E3.0.CO;2-O
Hallam, R. S., & Rachman, S. J. (1980). Courageous acts or courageous actors? Personality and Individual Differences, 1, 341346. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(80)90017-3
Ito, R., & Lee, A. C. (2016). The role of the hippocampus in approach-avoidance conflict decision-making: evidence from rodent and human studies. Behavioural Brain Research, 313, 345357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2016.07.039
Kotov, R., Gamez, W., Schmidt, F., & Watson, D. (2010). Linking “big” personality traits to anxiety, depressive, and substance use disorders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 768. https://doi:10.1037/a0020327
Kriegeskorte, N., Simmons, W. K., Bellgowan, P. S., & Baker, C. I. (2009). Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: The dangers of double dipping. Nature Neuroscience, 12, 535. https://doi:10.1038/nn.2303
Kumari, V., Das, M., Wilson, G. D., Goswami, S., & Sharma, T. (2007). Neuroticism and brain responses to anticipatory fear. Behavioral Neuroscience, 121, 643. http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0735-7044.121.4.643
McNaughton, N., & Corr, P. J. (2004). A two-dimensional neuropsychology of defense: Fear/anxiety and defensive distance. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 28, 285305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.03.005
Mobbs, D., Hagan, C. C., Dalgleish, T., Silston, B., & Prévost, C. (2015). The ecology of human fear: Survival optimization and the nervous system. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 9, 55. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00055
Mobbs, D., Marchant, J. L., Hassabis, D., Seymour, B., Tan, G., Gray, M., … Frith, C. D. (2009). From threat to fear: The neural organization of defensive fear systems in humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 1223612243. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2378-09.2009
Mobbs, D., Petrovic, P., Marchant, J. L., Hassabis, D., Weiskopf, N., Seymour, B., … Frith, C. D. (2007). When fear is near: Threat imminence elicits prefrontal-periaqueductal gray shifts in humans. Science, 317, 10791083. https://doi:10.1126/science.1144298
Mobbs, D., Yu, R., Rowe, J. B., Eich, H., FeldmanHall, O., & Dalgleish, T. (2010). Neural activity associated with monitoring the oscillating threat value of a tarantula. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 2058220586. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1009076107
Niendam, T. A., Laird, A. R., Ray, K. L., Dean, Y. M., Glahn, D. C., & Carter, C. S. (2012). Meta-analytic evidence for a superordinate cognitive control network subserving diverse executive functions. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 12, 241268. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-011-0083-5
Perkins, A. M., Arnone, D., Smallwood, J., & Mobbs, D. (2015). Thinking too much: Self-generated thought as the engine of neuroticism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19, 492498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.003
Perkins, A. M., Cooper, A., Abdelall, M., Smillie, L. D., & Corr, P. J. (2010). Personality and defensive reactions: Fear, trait anxiety, and threat magnification. Journal of Personality, 78, 10711090. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00643.x
Perkins, A. M., Ettinger, U., Weaver, K., Schmechtig, A., Schrantee, A., Morrison, P. D., … & Corr, P. J. (2013). Advancing the defensive explanation for anxiety disorders: Lorazepam effects on human defense are systematically modulated by personality and threat-type. Translational Psychiatry, 3, e246. http://doi:10.1038/tp.2013.20
Perkins, A. M., Ettinger, U., Davis, R., Foster, R., Williams, S. C., & Corr, P. J. (2009). Effects of lorazepam and citalopram on human defensive reactions: Ethopharmacological differentiation of fear and anxiety. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 1261712624. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2696-09.2009
Perkins, A. M., Inchley-Mort, S. L., Pickering, A. D., Corr, P. J., & Burgess, A. P. (2012). A facial expression for anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 910. http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0026825
Raichle, M. E., MacLeod, A. M., Snyder, A. Z., Powers, W. J., Gusnard, D. A., & Shulman, G. L. (2001). A default mode of brain function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98, 676682. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.98.2.676
Simmons, A., Moore, E., & Williams, S. C. (1999). Quality control for functional magnetic resonance imaging using automated data analysis and Shewhart charting. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 41, 12741278. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(199906)41:6%3C1274::AID-MRM27%3E3.0.CO;2-1
Stemmelin, J., Cohen, C., Terranova, J. P., Lopez-Grancha, M., Pichat, P., Bergis, O., … Stahl, S. M. (2008). Stimulation of the β 3-adrenoceptor as a novel treatment strategy for anxiety and depressive disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology, 33, 574587. https://doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1301424
Wolpe, J., & Lang, P. J. (1977). Manual for the fear survey schedule. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.
MathJax
MathJax is a JavaScript display engine for mathematics. For more information see http://www.mathjax.org.

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed