Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T22:26:11.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Gospel of Peter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 September 2009

Arthur Cushman McGiffert
Arthur Cushman McGiffert
Affiliation:
Professor of Church History in the Union Theological Seminary, New York City.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is perhaps not unfitting that some notice should be taken in our Society of Church History of what has proved to be one of the most interesting and important literary finds of recent years. I refer to the Greek MS., discovered by U. Bouriant in a tomb at Akhmîm, Egypt, in 1886, and first published in the fall of 1892. The MS. contains, as is well known, brief fragments of an early Christian Gospel and Apocalypse and two more extended fragments of the Book of Enoch. The fragment of the Apocalyse does not contain the name of its author, but toward the close of the Gospel fragment Peter is indicated as the writer of the Gospel in the sentence: “I Simon Peter and Andrew my brother took our nets and went away to the sea.” We have references in early Christian literature to a Gospel and an Apocalypse of Peter, and there can be little doubt that the fragments in question belong to those long-lost works. I shall concern myself to-day only with the Gospel fragment, which has excited chief interest among scholars and has already given rise to an extended literature.

Type
Research Article
Information
Papers of the American Society of Church History , Volume 6 , January 1894 , pp. 101 - 130
Copyright
Copyright © American Society for Church History 1894

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bouriant, U. Editio princeps (in Mémoires publiés par les membres de la mission archéologique française au Caire. Tom. ix., fase, i, pp. 137–147) Paris, 1892.Google Scholar
Harnack, Adolf. Bruchstücke des Evangeliums und der Apocalypse des Petrus (Sitzungsbericht der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 1892. S. 895–903, 949–965. Reprinted with additions in von Gebhardt und Harnack's Texte und Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der altchristlichen Literatur. Bd. ix., Heft 2. Leipzig, 1893. Zweite verbesserte und vermehrte Ausgabe, Leipzig, 1893).Google Scholar
S., H. B. [Swete, H. B..] The Apocryphal Gospel of Peter. The Greek text of the newly discovered fragment. London, 1892. Revised edition with some corrections from the manuscript. London, 1893.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. Armitage, and Montague Rhodes, James. The Gospel according to Peter and the Revelation of Peter. Two lectures on the newly recovered fragments, together with the Greek texts. London, 1892. Second edition, London, 1892.Google Scholar
Lods, Adolphe. Evangelii secundum Petrum et Petri Apocalypseos quae supersunt ad fidem codicis in Ægypto nuper inventi cum Latina versione et dissertatione critica. Parisiis, 1892.Google Scholar
Lods, Adolphe. L'Évangile et l'Apocalypse de Pierre publiés pour la première fois d'après les photographies du manuscrit de Gizéh. Avec un appendice sur les rectifications a aporter au texte Grec du Livre d'Hénoch. Paris, 1893.Google Scholar
DrFunk, Von. Fragmente des Evangeliums und der Apocalypse des Petrus (Theologische Quartalschrift, 1893. Heft 2, pp. 255–288).Google Scholar
Lods, Adolphe. Reproduction en héliogravure du manuscrit d'Hénoch et des écrits attribués à Saint Pierre avec introduction (Mémoires publiés par les membres de la mission archéologique française au Caire. Tome ix., fase 3, 1893: L'Évangile et l'Apocalypse de Pierre, pp. 219–228. Pl. i–x).Google Scholar
Zahn, Theodor. Das Evangelium des Petrus. Das kürzlich gefundene fragment seines Textes aufs neue herausgegeben, übersetzt und untersucht. (Reprint of two articles in the Neue Kirchliche Zeitschrift, Jahrg. 1893, Heft 2 und 3, with some additions.) Erlangen und Leipzig, 1893.Google Scholar
Hilgenfeld, Adolf. Das Petrus-Evangelium über Leiden und Auferstehung Jesu. (Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Theologie, 1893. Heft 4, pp. 439–454).Google Scholar
Manen, W. C. van. Het Evangelie van Petrus. Tekst en Vertaling. Leiden, 1893.Google Scholar
Swete, H. B. The Akhmîm Fragment of the Apocryphal Gospel of St. Peter. Edited with an introduction, notes, and indices. London, 1893.Google Scholar
Gebhardt, Oscar von. Das Evangelium und die Apocalypse des Petrus. Die neuentdeckten Bruchstücke nach einer Photographie der Handschrift zu Gizeh in Lichtdruck herausgegeben. Leipzig, 1893.Google Scholar
Lundborg, Matth. Det s. k. Petrusevangeliet, ett nyfunnet fragment ur en fornkristlig Apokryf. Lund, 1893.Google Scholar
Ménégoz, E. (Le Temoignage, 11 5, and 12, 1892).Google Scholar
Lods, Adolphe, Fragments d'évangile et d'apocalypse découverts en Égypte (Revue de l'histoire des religions, 11–12, 1892, pp. 331–333).Google Scholar
Bormann, . Das Evangelium des Petrus. (Deutsche Zeitung, 30 11 1892.) [Contains a translation.]Google Scholar
Bratke, Ed. Neuentdeckte Stücke der jüdischen und altchristlichen Literatur. I. [on the Gospel]. II. [on the Apocalypse]. (Theologisches Literaturblatt, 1892, 12 2, Sp. 567–570; 12 9, Sp. 575–578.)Google Scholar
Σ. The Gospel of Peter (The Academy, 12 3, 1892, p. 509).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Headlam, Arthur C. Newly Discovered Christian Documents. I. The Gospel of Peter. II. The Apocalypse of Peter. (The Guardian, 1892; 12 7, pp. 1883–1884; 12 14, p. 1929.)Google Scholar
Redpath, Henry A. The Gospel according to Peter (The Academy, 12 10, 1892, p. 544).Google Scholar
Schürer, E. Griechische Fragmente des Buches Henoch, des Evangeliums Petri und der Apocalypse Pétri (Theologische Literaturzeitung, 12 10, 1892, Sp. 609–612).Google Scholar
Bonwetsch, N. Aus dem Evangelium des Petrus (Mittheilungen und Nachrichten für die evangelische Kirche in Russland, 11–12, 1892, S. 538–543). [Contains a translation.]Google Scholar
Crooks, G. R. The Gospel of Peter. (Review of the Churches, 12 15, 1892.)Google Scholar
Nicholson, E. W. B. The Gospel according to Peter (The Academy, 12 17, 1892, p. 567; and 12 24, p. 593).Google Scholar
Badham, F. P. The New Apocryphal Literature (The Athenœum, 12 17, 1892, pp. 854–855).Google Scholar
Schubert, H. von. Neue Funde auf dem Gebiete der urchristlichen Literatur. I. Das Evangelium des Petrus. II. Die Apocalypse des Petrus. (Die christliche Welt, 19 12, 1892, und 12 01, 1893, Sp. 7–12, 50–54).Google Scholar
Barnard, J. H. The Gospel according to Peter (The Academy, 12 24, 1892, p. 593).Google Scholar
Thayer, J. Henry. The New Gospel according to Peter. (The Boston Commonwealth, 12 31, 1892, p. 2sq.).Google Scholar
Davies, T. W. The Gospel and the Apocalypse of Peter and Other Discoveries (The Baptist, 1893, 01 13 and 20).Google Scholar
Murray, J. O. F. Evangelium secundum Petrum (The Expositor, 01, 1893, pp. 50–61). [Contains the translation of Robinson.]Google Scholar
Harris, J. Rendel. The newly Recovered Gospel of St. Peter with a Full Account of the Same. London and New York, 1893. [Contains a translation.]Google Scholar
Meunier, Charles. L'Évangile selon Saint Pierre. Traduction française avec notes. Boulogne-sur-mer, 1893.Google Scholar
Sabatier, A. (Revue de l'histoire des religions, 01–02, 1893, pp. 76–78). [A review of Lods.]Google Scholar
Kunze, Joh. Das neuaufgefundene Bruchstück des sogenannten Petrusevangeliums übersetzt und beurtheilt. Leipzig, 1893.Google Scholar
Schürer, E. Die Ausgaben von Robinson, Lods und Harnack (Theologische Literaturzeitung, 01 21, 1893, Sp. 33–37).Google Scholar
Bennett, E. N. The Gospel according to Peter (The Classical Review, 02, 1893, pp. 40–42).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradner, Lester Jr. An Important Discovery of MSS. (The Biblical World, 01, 1893, pp. 33–35).Google Scholar
Harnack, Adolf. Die neuentdeckten Bruchstücke des Petrusevangeliums und der Petrusapokalypse (Preussische Jahrbücher, 01, 1893, S. 36–58).Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-Möllendorf, W. von. Conjecturen zu den Petrus Fragmenten (Göttinger Index Scholarum für das Sommersemester, 1893, S. 31sq.).Google Scholar
Manchot, K. Die neuen Petrusfragmente (Protestantische Kirchenaeitung, 1893: 02 8, Sp. 126–143; 02 15, Sp. 160–166; 02 22, Sp. 176–183; März, 1, Sp. 201–213).Google Scholar
Bratke, Ed. Studien über die neuentdeckten Stücke der jüdischen und altchristlichen Literatur (Theologisches Literaturblatt, 1893: 02 17, Sp. 73–79; März 3, Sp. 97–102.)Google Scholar
Nösgen, C. Der Fund von Akhmîm (Evangelische Kirchenzeitung, 1893: 02 19, Sp. 125–128; 02 26, Sp. 141–144; März 8, Sp. 149–156).Google Scholar
Hall, Isaac H. The newly Discovered Apocryphal Gospel of Peter (The Biblical World. 02, 1893, pp. 88–98). [Contains a translation.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haller, W. Ein Fragment des Evangeliums Petri (Kirchlicher Anzeiger für Württemberg. 1893, No. 17, Sp. 163–165). [Contains a translation.]Google Scholar
A Fragment of the Apocryphal Gospel of St. Peter found at Akhmîm in Egypt. Translation from the Greek. London (Norgate), 1893.Google Scholar
Nestle, E. Le. 24.4, Act 1,10 und das Petrus-Evangelium (Evangelisches Kirchenblatt für Württemberg, 1893, No. 4).Google Scholar
Soden, H. von. Das Petrusevangelium und die canonischen Evangelien (Zeitschrift für Theologie und Kirche, 1893, Heft I, S. 52–92).Google Scholar
Lejay, Paul. L'Évangile de Pierre (Revue des études Grecques, Janvier-Mars, 1893, pp. 59–84). [Contains a translation.]Google Scholar
Z [öckler, O.] Die neuentdeckten Petrus-pseudepigraphin (Beweis des Glaubens, März, 1893, S. 124–126).Google Scholar
Smyth, Egbert C. [A Review of Robinson, Harris, Headlam, and Harnack.] (Andover Review, 03–04, 1893, pp. 262–266).Google Scholar
Thayer, J. Henry. The Gospel according to Peter and the Revelation of Peter. [A review of Robinson and James.] (The New World, 03 1893, pp. 170–174.)Google Scholar
Potwin, Thomas Stoughton. The Gospel of Peter (The Independent, 03 30, 1893, p. 432).Google Scholar
Schürer, E. (Theologische Literaturzeitung, 04 1, 1893, Sp. 187–188.)Google Scholar
Davis, Ozora S. The Gospel according to Peter. (Hartford Seminary Record, 04 1893, pp. 177–188). [Contains a translation.]Google Scholar
Richardson, Ernest C. [A review of Lods, Harnack. Robinson and Harris.] (Presbyterian and Reformed Review, 04, 1893, pp. 319–321.)Google Scholar
RevMaas, Anthony J., S. J. The lately Recovered Apocryphal Gospel. (American Catholic Quarterly Review, 04, 1893, pp. 313–328.) [Contains a translation.]Google Scholar
RevMoulton, J. H. The Gospel of Peter and the Four. (The Expository Times, 04 1893.)Google Scholar
Reinach, S. L'évangile de St. Pierre. Paris, 1893.Google Scholar
Kihn, H. Ein patristischer Fund: Evangelium und Apokalypse des heil. Petrus. (Der Katholik, 04, 1893, pp. 297–310.)Google Scholar
McGiffert, A. C. The Alleged Docetism of the Gospel of Peter. (The Independent, 1893, 05 4, p. 615; 05 11, pp. 646–647.)Google Scholar
Badham, F. P. Additions to the Gospel of St. Peter. (The Athenœum, 05 13, 1893, pp. 605–606.)Google Scholar
Martineau, Dr., on the Gospel of Peter. (The Academy, 05 20, 1893, p. 441.) [Account of a lecture delivered by Dr. Martineau.]Google Scholar
Azn, W. Francken. Het onlangs gevonden Petrus-evangelie. Vertaling met een enkele aanteekening. (Gelaufen en Vrijheid, 1893, p. 188–209.)Google Scholar
Rovers, M. A. N. Eene nieuwe ontdekking. (Bibl. u. mod. Theol. en left., 1893, p. 605–620.)Google Scholar
Manen, W. C. van. Het evangelie van Vetrus. I. De ontdekking. Literatuur. II. Echtheid. Tekst. Inhoud (vs. 1–27). III. Inhoud (vs. 28–60). Karakter. Verhouding tot andere evangeliën. Herkomst. Lotgevallen. Waarde. Nagekomen Literatuur. (Theologische Tijdschrift, 1893: No. 3, p. 317–333; No. 4, p. 379–432; No. 5, p. 517–572.)Google Scholar
Holtzmann, H. (Theologischer Jahresbericht, Bd. XII., 1892, S. 120.)Google Scholar
Lüdemann, H. (Theologischer Jahresbericht, pp. 171–172.)Google Scholar
DrFunk, von. Eine Spur oder Nachwirkung des Petrusevangeliums in dem Dialog des Adamantius de recta in Deum fide. ( Theologische Quarlalschrift, 1893, S. 349.)Google Scholar
Schubert, Hans von. Die Composition des Pseudopetrinischen Evangelienfragments. Mit einer synoptischen Tabelle als Ergänzungsheft. Berlin, 1893.Google Scholar
Schubert, Hans von. Das Petrusevangelium. Synoptische Tabelle nebst Uebersetzung und kritischem Apparat. Berlin, 1893.Google Scholar
Völter, Daniel. Petrusevangelium oder Aegypterevangelium ? Eine Frage bezüglich des neuentdeckten Evangelienfragments. Tübingen 1893. [Contains a translation.]Google Scholar
Z[oeckler, O.] Nochmals die Petrus-pseudepigraphen. (Beweis des Glaubens, 1893, Mai, S. 204–205.)Google Scholar
RevKemble, D. The true Gospel according to Peter. (Methodist Review, 05–06, 1893.)Google Scholar
An Emendation of the Gospel of Peter. [Proposed by Dr. Sandys.] (The Academy, 06 3, 1893, p. 446.)Google Scholar
Barnes, W. E. The Gospel of Peter and the Didascalia. (The Academy, 06 24, 1893, p. 547.)Google Scholar
Taylor, C. Justin Martyr and the Gospel of Peter. (The Classical Review, 06, 1893, p. 246–248.)Google Scholar
Martineau, James. The Gospel of Peter. (The Nineteenth Century, 1893: 06, pp. 905–926; 10, pp. 633–656.)Google Scholar
Rohrbach, P. Zum Petrusevangelium. (Preussische Jahrbücher, 1893, Juni, S. 529–534.)Google Scholar
Hilgenfeld, Adolf. Zu dem Petrusevangelium. (Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Theologie, 1893, Band II., Heft I, S. 160).Google Scholar
Die neuaufgefundenen Petrusfragmente. I. Das Petrus evangelium. (Allgemeine Evangelisch-Lutherische Kirchenzeitung, 1893: Nr. 16, Sp, 401–404; Nr. 18, Sp. 449–451; Nr. 19, Sp. 473–474; Nr. 20, Sp. 500–501; Nr. 21, Sp. 521–523.)Google Scholar
Barnes, W. E. Canonical and uncanonical Gospels. With a translation of the recently discovered fragment of the Gospel of Peter, and a selection from the sayings of our Lord, not found in the four Gospels. London, 1893.Google Scholar
Badham, F. P. The Origin of the Peter Gospel. (The Academy, 1893, 07 29, pp. 91–93; 08 5, pp. 111–112.)Google Scholar
Tyler, Thomas. “The Lord” in the Gospel of Peter. (The Academy, 1893: 07 29, p. 94; 09 30, pp. 275–276.)Google Scholar
Harris, J. Rendel. The Structure of the Gospel of Peter. (Contemporary Review, 08, 1893, pp. 212–236.)Google Scholar
Hilgenfeld, Adolf. Das Petrusevangelium. (Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Theologie, 1893, Band II., Heft 2, S. 220–267.)Google Scholar
Schubert, H. von. (Theologische Literaturzeitung, 09 30, 1893, Sp. 498–504.) [A review of Kunze, Lundborg, and Völler.]Google Scholar
Schubert, H. von, The Gospel of St. Peter: Synoptical Tables with translations and critical apparatus. Authorized English translation by Rev. John Macpherson. Edinburgh, 1893.Google Scholar
Jacquier, E. L'évangile selon St. Pierre. (L'université catholique, 09, 1893, p. 5–29.)Google Scholar
Bernard, J. H. The Gospel of Peter and Dionysius of Alexandria. (The Academy, 09 30, 1893, p. 275.)Google Scholar
Zoeckler, O. Der echte und der gefälschte Petrus. (Beweis des Glaubens, 09, 1893, Sp. 349–351.)Google Scholar
Chapuis, P. L'évangile et l'apocalypse de Pierre. I. (Revue de Théologie et de Philosophie, 1893, 4, p. 338–355.)Google Scholar
Kunze, J. Das Petrusevangelium. I. (Neue Jahrbücher für Deutsche Theologie, 1893, Heft 4, Sp. 583–604.)Google Scholar
The Gospel of Peter. (The Thinker, 10, 1893, pp. 359–362.)Google Scholar
Conybeare, F. C. Had Polycarp the Gospel of Peter in his hands ? (The Academy: 1893, 10 21, pp. 343–344; 12 23, p. 568–569.)Google Scholar
Legge, F. Some Heretical Gospels. (The Scottish Review, 1893, pp. 133–162.)Google Scholar
Wabnitz, A. Les fragments de l'Évangile et de l'Apocalypse de Pierre. (Revue de théologie et des questions relig., 1893, 6, p. 474–487.)Google Scholar
Headlam, Arthur C. The Akhmîm Fragments. I. The Gospel of Peter. II. The Apocalypse of Peter. (Classical Review, 12, 1893, pp. 458–463.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garnett, James M. The Gospel of St. Peter, (Protestant Episcopal Review, 12, 1893.)Google Scholar
Sabatier, A. L'Évangile de Pierre et les évangiles canoniques. Paris, 1893.Google Scholar