Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T09:55:43.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Functional evaluation of treatment of chronic disease: Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Spiritual Well-Being Scale

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2017

Ümmühan Aktürk Open the ORCID record for Ümmühan Aktürk [Opens in a new window] ,
Behice Erci  and
Murat Araz
Ümmühan Aktürk*
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health Nursing, School of Health, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey
Behice Erci
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health Nursing, School of Health, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey
Murat Araz
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Oncology, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Ümmühan Aktürk, Department of Public Health Nursing, School of Health, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey44280. E-mail: ummuhan_akturk@hotmail.com.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

This study was conducted for the purpose of adapting the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT–Sp) for the Turkish context and determining its validity and reliability.

Method:

In 2016, a convenience sample of 137 cancer patients from Malatya State Hospital completed a structured questionnaire, which provided demographic characteristics, and the FACIT–Sp–12 for patients with cancer. The obtained data were assessed using Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient (α), Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient (r), factor analysis, Bartlett's test of sphericity, and the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy.

Results:

The result of the KMO test was determined to be 0.827 and that of Bartlett's test 988.692, and both were observed to be significant at a level of p < 0.001. The value of Cronbach's α for the Spiritual Well-Being Scale (SWBS) was determined to be 0.87, and the α values for the SWBS subgroups ranged from 0.78 to 0.93. Our analysis determined that the factors had initial eigenvalues above 1, and that they accounted for 61.61% of the total variance.

Significance of results:

Our study determined that the Turkish version of the FACIT–Sp has validity and reliability and can be used in Turkish society. We believe that the scale can be used safely in determining convenient care and in planning individual educational programs to enhance patients' spiritual well-being.

Keywords

CancerChemotherapySpiritual well-beingNursingConstruct validity
Type
Original Articles
Information
Palliative & Supportive Care , Volume 15 , Issue 6 , December 2017 , pp. 684 - 692
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Acar, H. (2014). Spiritual well-being: With an evaluation on its relationship with religiosity [in Turkish]. Journal of the Faculty of Theology, 18, 391–412.Google Scholar
Akgül, A. (2005). A statistical analysis: Methods in medical research—SPSS applications [in Turkish]. Ankara: Emek.Google Scholar
Aksayan, S. & Gözüm, S. (2002). A guidelines for intercultural scale adaptation, part 1: Scale and language adaptation stage adaptation [in Turkish]. Hemşirelik Araştırma Geliştirme Dergisi, 4, 9–14.Google Scholar
Alpar, R. (2010). Sports, health and applied statistics and reliability and validity with examples of educational science [in Turkish]. Ankara: Detay.Google Scholar
Alpar, R. (2011). Applied multivariate statistical methods [in Turkish]. Ankara: Detay.Google Scholar
Aston University (2016). Spiritual wellbeing. Available from http://www.aston.ac.uk/staff/hr/wellbeing/psychological-wellbeing/spiritual-wellbeing/.Google Scholar
Boscaglia, N., Clarke, D.M., Jobling, T.W., et al. (2005). The contribution of spirituality and spiritual coping to anxiety and depression in women with a recent diagnosis of gynecological cancer. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 15(5), 755–761.Google Scholar
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). A data analysis handbook for the social sciences [in Turkish]. Ankara: Pegem.Google Scholar
Brady, M.J., Peterman, A.H., Fitchett, G., et al. (1999). A case for including spirituality in quality of life measurement in oncology. Psycho-Oncology(5) , 8, 417–428 3.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bredle, J.M., Salsman, J.M., Debb, S.M., et al. (2011). Spiritual well-being as a component of health-related quality of life: The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT–Sp). Religions, 2(1), 77–94. Available from http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/2/1/77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canada, A.L., Murphy, P.E., Fitchett, G., et al. (2008). A 3-actor model for the FACIT–Sp. Psycho-Oncology, 17(9), 908–916.Google Scholar
Canada, A.L., Murphy, P.E., Fitchett, G., et al. (2015). Re-examining the contributions of faith, meaning, and peace to quality of life: A report from the American Cancer Society's Studies of Cancer Survivors–II (SCS–II). Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 50(1), 79–88.Google Scholar
Cella, D., Tulsky, D.S., Gray, G., et al. (1993). The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scale: Development and validation of the general measure. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 11(3), 570–579. Available from http://ascopubs.org/doi/pdf/10.1200/JCO.1993.11.3.570.Google Scholar
Chida, Y., Hamer, M., Wardle, J., et al. (2008). Do stress-related psychosocial factors contribute to cancer incidence and survival? Nature Clinical Practice . Oncology, 5(8), 466–475. Epub ahead of print May 20.Google Scholar
Choumanova, I., Wanat, S., Barrett, R., et al. (2006). Religion and spirituality in coping with breast cancer: Perspective of Chilean women. The Breast Journal, 12(4), 349–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Çimen, S., Bahar, Z. & Öztürk, B.M. (2005). Reliability and validity of the AIDS Attitude Scale [in Turkish]. Zonguldak Health School Health Education Research Journal, 1(2), 1–12.Google Scholar
Cimete, G. (2002). End-of-life care [in Turkish]. Istanbul: Nobel.Google Scholar
Cohen, S., Janicki-Deverts, D. & Miller, G.E. (2007). Psychological stress and disease. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 298(14), 1685–1687. Available from http://kungfu.psy.cmu.edu/~scohen/JAMA_2007_Psy_Stress_Disease.pdf.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). SPSS and LISREL: Application of multivariate statistics for the social sciences [in Turkish]. Ankara: Pegem.Google Scholar
Cotton, S.P., Levine, E.G., Fitzpatrick, C.M., et al. (1999). Exploring the relationships among spiritual well-being, quality of life, and psychological adjustment in women with breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 8(5), 429–438.Google Scholar
Cucino, C. & Sonnenberg, A. (2002). Occupational mortality from squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus in the United States during 1991–1996. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 47(3), 568–572.Google Scholar
Daniels, M., Merrill, R.M., Lyon, J.L., et al. (2004). Associations between breast cancer risk factors and religious practices in Utah. Preventive Medicine, 38(1), 28–38.Google Scholar
Erefe, I. (2002). The nature of data collection tools [in Turkish]. In Hamsirelikte research. Erefe I, I.. (ed.), pp. 169–188. Istanbul: Odak Offset.Google Scholar
Fitchett, G., Peterman, A.H. & Cella, D. (1996). Spiritual beliefs and quality of life in cancer and HIV patients. Paper presented at the World Congress of Psycho-Oncology, New York, October 3–6, 1996.Google Scholar
Gardner, J.W. & Lyon, J.L. (1982). Cancer in Utah Mormon men by lay priesthood level. American Journal of Epidemiology, 116(2), 243–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugan, G. (2015). The FACIT–Sp Spiritual Well-Being Scale: An investigation of the dimensionality, reliability and construct validity in a cognitively intact nursing home population. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 29; 152–164. Epub ahead of print Mar 24, 2014.Google Scholar
Hoeman, S.P. (2002). Rehabilitation nursing: Process, application & outcomes, 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby.Google Scholar
Kara, B. & Fesci, H. (2004). Self-care and quality of life in cancer. Hematology and Oncology, 6(4), 124–129.Google Scholar
Karasar, N. (2012). Scientific research methods [in Turkish]. Ankara: Nobel.Google Scholar
Kinney, A.Y., Bloor, L.E., Dudley, W.N., et al. (2003). Roles of religious involvement and social support in the risk of colon cancer among blacks and whites. American Journal of Epidemiology, 158(11), 1097–1107.Google Scholar
Koenig, H.G., King, D.E. & Carson, V.B. (2012). Handbook of religion and health, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MacArthur, A.C., Le, N.D., Abanto, Z.U., et al. (2007). Occupational female breast and reproductive cancer mortality in British Columbia, Canada, 1950–94. Occupational Medicine, 57(4), 246–253. Epub ahead of print Feb 22. Available from https://academic.oup.com/occmed/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/occmed/kqm002.Google Scholar
Milligan, S. (2004). Perceptions of spiritual care among nurses undertaking post-registration education. International Journal of Palliative Nursing, 10(4), 162–171.Google Scholar
Moberg, D.O. (1984). Subjective measures of spiritual well-being. Review of Religious Research, 25(4), 351–359. Available from https://www.jstor.org/stable/3511368?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.Google Scholar
Monod, S., Brennan, M., Rochat, E., et al. (2011). Instruments measuring spirituality in clinical research: A systematic review. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 26(11), 1345–1357. Epub ahead of print Jul 2.Google Scholar
Munoz, A.R., Salsman, J.M., Stein, K., et al. (2015). Reference values of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being: A report from the American Cancer Society's studies of cancer survivors. Cancer, 121(11), 1838–1844. Epub ahead of print Feb 24. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4441564/.Google Scholar
Murphy, P.E., Canada, A.L., Fitchett, G., et al. (2010). An examination of the 3-factor model and structural invariance across racial/ethnic groups for the FACIT–Sp: A report from the American Cancer Society's Study of Cancer Survivors–II (SCS–II). Psycho-Oncology, 19(3), 264–272.Google Scholar
Naguib, S.M., Lundin, F.E. & Davis, H.J. (1966). Relation of various epidemiologic factors to cervical cancer as determined by a screening program. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 28(4), 451–459.Google ScholarPubMed
Narayanasamy, A. (2002). Spiritual coping mechanisms in chronically ill patients. British Journal of Nursing, 11(22), 1461–1470.Google Scholar
Narayanasamy, A. & Owens, J.A. (2001). A critical incident study of nurses' responses to the spiritual needs of their patients. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 33(4), 446–455.Google Scholar
Noguchi, W., Ohno, T., Morita, S., et al. (2004). Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Spiritual (FACIT–Sp) for Japanese patients with cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer, 12(4), 240–245.Google Scholar
Paloutzian, R.F. & Ellison, C.W. (1982). Loneliness, spiritual well-being and quality of life. In Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy. Peplau, L.A. & Perlman, D. (eds.), pp. 224–237. New York: Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar
Peterman, A., Fitchett, G., Brady, L.M., et al. (2002). Measuring spiritual well-being in people with cancer: The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Spiritual Well-Being Scale. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24(1), 49–58.Google Scholar
Peterman, A.H., Reeve, C.L., Winford, E.C., et al. (2014). Measuring meaning and peace with the FACIT–Spiritual Well-Being Scale: Distinction without a difference? Psychological Assessment, 26(1), 127–37. Epub ahead of print Nov 4, 2013. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4081471/,Google Scholar
Ringdal, G.I. (1996). Religiosity, quality of life, and survival in cancer patients. Social Indicators Research, 38(2), 193–211, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnall, E., Wassertheil-Smoller, SC., Swencionis, C., et al. (2010). The relationship between religion and cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality in the women's health initiative observational study. Psychology & Health, 25(2), 249–263.Google Scholar
Şencan, H. (2005). Reliability and validity in the social and behavioral measurements [in Turkish]. Ankara: Outstanding Publishing.Google Scholar
Taylor, E.J. (2003). Spiritual needs of patients with cancer and family caregivers. Cancer Nursing, 26(4), 260–266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tezbaşaran, A.A. (2008). Likert-type scale preparation manual [in Turkish], 3rd ed. Available from http://www.academia.edu/1288035/.Google Scholar
Vanness, P.H., Kasl, S.V. & Jones, B.A. (2003). Religion, race, and breast cancer survival. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 33(4), 357–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahl, A., Rustøen, T., Lerdal, A., et al. (2004). The Norwegian version of the Herth Hope Index (HHI–N): A psychometric study. Palliative & Supportive Care, 2(3), 255–263.Google Scholar
Whitford, H.S. & Olver, I.N. (2012). The multidimensionality of spiritual wellbeing: Peace, meaning, and faith and their association with quality of life and coping in oncology. Psycho-Oncology, 21(6), 602–510. Epub ahead of print Mar 2, 2011.Google Scholar
Wong, Y.K., Tsai, W.C., Lin, J.C., et al. (2006). Socio-demographic factors in the prognosis of oral cancer patients. Oral Oncology, 42(9), 893–906. Epub ahead of print May 26.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2012). GLOBOCAN 2012: Estimated cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2012. Available from http://globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/fact_sheets_cancer.aspx.Google Scholar
Wrensch, M., Chew, T., Farren, G., et al. (2013). Risk factors for breast cancer in a population with high incidence rates. Breast Cancer Research, 5(4), R88–$102. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC165017/.Google Scholar
Yanez, B., Edmondson, D., Stanton, A.L., et al. (2009). Facets of spirituality as predictors of adjustment to cancer: Relative contributions of having faith and finding meaning. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77(4), 730–741. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2825181/.Google Scholar
Zinnbauer, B.J. (2000). Conceptualizing religion and spirituality: Points of commonality, points of departure. Journal for The Theory of Social Behaviour, 30(1), 51–77.Google Scholar