Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-559fc8cf4f-dxfhg Total loading time: 0.423 Render date: 2021-02-25T11:48:19.490Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Should community-based services be publicly funded or contracted out?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

Lynnette Nathalie Lyzwinski
Affiliation:
Vancouver Coastal Health Community, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

Objective:

The introduction of Canada's Medicare in 1966 established precedence for a universally accessible and equitable healthcare system. Although Canada has been a leader in building the foundations of socialized medicine, it has stalled short of fulfilling a vision promulgated by its architects of a system that operates on a continuum of care. The aim of this review was to examine whether the expansion of publicly funded services under the Canada Health Act would be an economically and socially viable policy option.

Method:

A literature review of the direct and indirect social and economic costs associated with contracting out community-based services in the form of outpatient rehabilitative care, palliative care, and home care was conducted.

Results:

This article concludes that the private financing of community-based services increases healthcare costs in the long term through increased density and frequency of acute care utilization. It is associated with increased indirect costs in the form of caregiver burden and reduced labor market participation of informal caregivers. The expansion of publicly funded community-based services minimizes these direct health and indirect societal costs.

Significance of results:

The integration of publicly funded community-based services under the Canada Health Act would ensure that the principles of Medicare in the form of equity and accessibility would be enforced while maintaining an economically sustainable healthcare system.

Type
Review Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Armstrong, P. & Armstrong, H. (2008). About Canada: Health Care. Nova Scotia: Fernwood Publishing.Google Scholar
Browne, G., Gafni, A., Byrne, C., et al. (1999). economic evaluations of community-based care: Lessons from twelve studies in Ontario. Journal of Evaluative Clinical Practice, 5, 367385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donelan, K., Falik, M. & DeRoches, C.M (2001). Caregiving: Challenges and implications for women's health. Women's Health Issues, 11, 185200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duxbury, L., Higgins, C. & Johnson, K. (1999). An examination of the implications and costs of work-life conflict in Canada. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hppb/childhood-youth/spsc/pdf/Duxbury.pdf.Google Scholar
Edwards, N., Birke, N., Nair, R., et al. (2006). Access to bathtub grab bars: Evidence of a policy gap. Canadian Journal of Aging, 25, 295304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garcia-Calvente, M.M., Rodriguez, M. & Eqyuguren, A.P (2004). The system of informal caregiving as inequality. Gaseta sanitària de Barcelona, 1, 132139.Google Scholar
Gildiner, A. (2006). Measuring shrinkage in the welfare state. forms of privatization in a Canadian healthcare sector. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 39, 5375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerriere, D.M., Wong, A.Y., Croxford, R., et al. (2008). Costs and determinants of privately financed home-based healthcare Ontario, Canada. Health & Social Care in the Community, 16, 126136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hakim, E.A. & Bakheit, A.M (1998). A study of the factors which influence the length of hospital stay of stroke patients. Clinical Rehabilitation, 12, 151156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landry, M.D., Deber, R.B., Jaglal, S., et al. (2006). Assessing the consequences of delisting publicly funded community-based physical therapy on self-reported health in Ontario, Canada: A prospective cohort study. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 29, 303307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luthi, F., Funcina, N., Divorne, N., et al. (2011). Home care–A safe and attractive alternative to inpatient administration of intensive chemotherapies. Supportiv Care in Cancer, 20, 575581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marchildon, G.P. (2004). Three choices for the future of Medicare. Caledon Institute of Social Policy, http://www.caledoninst.dreamhosters.com/Publications/PDF/466ENG.pdf.Google Scholar
Mann, W.C., Ottenbacher, K.J., Fraa, L., et al. (1999). Effectiveness of assistive technology and environmental interventions in maintaining independence and reducing home care costs for the frail elderly. A randomized control trial. ACP Journal Club, 131, 71.Google Scholar
Metlife. (1999). The MetLife Juggling Act Study: Balancing Caregiving with Work and the Costs Involved. Westport, CT: Metropolitan Life Insurance Company.Google Scholar
Mitchell, G., Salmon, J.R., Polivka, L., et al. (2006). The relative benefits and cost of Medicaid home- and community-based services. Gerontologist, 46, 483494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, M., Robinson, J., Simpson, S., et al. (1999). The Changing Nature of Home Care and Its Impact on Women's Vulnerability to Poverty. Ottawa: Status of Women Canada. Canadian Research Institute for the Advancement of Women.Google Scholar
Muramatsu, N., Yin, H., Campbell, R.T., et al. (2007). Risk of nursing home admission among older Americans: does state's spending on home- and community-based services matter? Journals of Gerontology. Series B. Psychological and Social Sciences, 62, S169178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navaie-Waiser, M., Feldman, P.H., Gould, D.A., et al. (2001). the experiences and challenges of informal caregivers: common themes and differences among Whites, Blacks, Hispanics. Gerontologist, 41, 733741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, J., Park, L., Ryder, E., et al. (2008). Delisting publicly funded community-based physical therapy services in ontario, canada: A 12 month follow-up study of the perceptions of clients and providers. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 24, 329343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plautz, B., Beck, D.E., Selmar, C., et al. (1996). Modifying the environment: A community based injury-reduction program for elderly patients. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 12 (Suppl. 4), 3338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romanov, R. (2002). Building on Values. The Future of Health Care in Canada. http://www.cbc.ca/healthcare/final_report.pdf.Google Scholar
Rubin, R.M. (2002). The Economic Costs of Informal Elder Caregiving. Entrepreneur. http://www.entrepreneur.com/tradejournals/article/96810450.htm.Google Scholar
Scott, V., Wager, B., Sum, A., et al. (2010). A public health approach to fall prevention among older persons in Canada. Clinical Geriatric Medicine, 26, 705716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, M. & Sawyer, E. (2002). Continuing the Care: The Issues and Challenges for Long-Term Care. Ottawa: CHA Press.Google Scholar
Tamir, O., Singer, Y. & Schvartzman, P. (2007). Taking care of terminally ill patients at home–the economic perspective revisited. Palliative Medicine, 21, 537541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Excel, J., de Graaf, G. & Brouwer, W. (2008). Give me a break! Informal caregiver attitudes towards respite care. Health Policy, 88, 7387.Google Scholar
Van Ryn, M., Sanders, S., Kahn, K., et al. (2011).Objective burden, resources and other stressors among informal cancer caregivers: A hidden quality issue? Psychooncology, 20, 4452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 9
Total number of PDF views: 89 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th February 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Should community-based services be publicly funded or contracted out?
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Should community-based services be publicly funded or contracted out?
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Should community-based services be publicly funded or contracted out?
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *