Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g7rbq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-31T09:09:36.465Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Science, Creationism, and the Constitution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2017

Delos B. McKown
Delos B. McKown*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Auburn University, AL 36849
Get access

Abstract

Even though our Constitution is utterly secular, the practice of religion enjoys stronger legal guarantees than does the dissemination of scientific knowledge, especially in the public schools. Americans are often led to believe that science and religion do not conflict, but this is false whenever a religion based on scriptural inerrancy arises as is now the case with resurgent fundamentalism. Current battles between “scientific creationism” and evolution illustrate but do not exhaust this point. Since science education cannot escape the growing fundamentalist threat, the friends of science ought to increase their influence in public school curricula, in guaranteeing scientific integrity in curricula, and in improving the image of science.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Paleontological Society Special Publications , Volume 1: The Evolution-Creation Controversy: Perspectives on Religion, Science, and Education-A Handbook , 1984 , pp. 134 - 140
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Bird, W. 1978. Freedom of Religion and Science Instruction in Public Schools. Yale Law Review, 87: 518, 523, 525, 531, 538.Google Scholar
Gish, D. 1973. Evolution: The Fossils Say No! Creation-Life Publishers, San Diego, 2nd ed., 4 p.Google Scholar
Gould, S. 1982. Genesis vs. Geology. The Atlantic, September: 14.Google Scholar
McKown, D. 1982. Creationism and the First Amendment. Creation/Evolution, VII: 30–32.Google Scholar
Mill, J., Theism, Collected Works. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 10: 432, 450.Google Scholar
Miller, H. (ed.). 1931. Treaties and Other International Acts of the United States of America. U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C., 2: 365.Google Scholar
Morris, H. 1964. The Twilight of Evolution. Baker Book House, Grand Rapids, 93 p.Google Scholar
Morrison, D. 1982. The Skeptical Inquirer. VII: 5–7.Google Scholar
O'Neil, R. 1982. Creationism, Curriculum and the Constitution. Academe, March-April, 21 p.Google Scholar
Opel, J. 1982. Education, Science and National Economic Competitiveness. Science, 27: 1116–1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, M. 1981. Banning a Textbook. The New York Times, May 31.Google Scholar
Sheaffer, R. 1982. The Skeptical Inquirer. VIII: 7–8.Google Scholar
Zuidema, H. 1981. Less Evolution, More Creationism in Texts. Educational Leadership, 39: 217–218.Google Scholar