Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T23:54:10.270Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How caimans protect fish stocks in western Brazilian Amazonia – a case for maintaining the ban on caiman hunting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2009

Carlos A. Peres  and
Anina M. Carkeek
Carlos A. Peres
Affiliation:
Museu Goeldi, Departamento de Zoologia, Cx. Postal 399, Belém, Pará 66.040, Brazil.
Anina M. Carkeek
Affiliation:
Museu Goeldi, Departamento de Zoologia, Cx. Postal 399, Belém, Pará 66.040, Brazil.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Rubber tapper communities along the large white-water rivers of central-western Brazilian Amazonia rely heavily on local fish stocks all year round. This subsistence fishing faces severe competition from commercial fishing boats from urban centres, which in some areas have over-fished the economically most important fish species. In the Juntá River and its oxbow lakes, two species of freshwater crocodilians – the black and the spectacled caiman – indirectly benefit subsistence fishermen by disrupting commercial fishing operations. The gill-nets used by commercial fishing boats are often damaged beyond immediate repair by the caimans as they make easy pickings of the catch. This appears to deter overharvesting of important fish stocks in many sections of the river. In contrast, subsistence fishermen use fishing gear that is rarely damaged by caimans. It would seem that caimans at their present numbers offer protection to local fish stocks by reducing the efficiency and financial viability of commercial fisheries, which would otherwise rapidly reduce fish yields for local rubber tappers.

Type
Research Article
Information
Oryx , Volume 27 , Issue 4 , October 1993 , pp. 225 - 230
Copyright
Copyright © Fauna and Flora International 1993

References

Anon., 1990. A vote against the Amazon. Newsweek, 22 10 1990.Google Scholar
Bates, H.W. 1863. The Naturalist on the River Amazon. John Murray, London.Google Scholar
Best, R.C. 1984. The aquatic mammals and reptiles of the Amazon. In The Amazon: Limnology and Landscape Ecology of a Mighty Tropical River and its Basin (ed. Sioli, H.), pp. 371–412. W. Junk, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, J.C. 1967. A conservação da natureza e recursos naturais na Amazōnia brasileira. Atas do Simpósio sobre a Biota Amazónica, 7, 1–47.Google Scholar
Dourojeanni, M.J. 1974. Impacto de la producción de la fauna silvestre en la economía de la Amazonía peruana. Rev. For. Perú, 5, 15–27.Google Scholar
Fittkau, E.J. 1970. Role of caimans in the nutrient regime of mouth-lakes of Amazon affluents (an hypothesis). Biotropica, 2, 138–142.Google Scholar
Gaski, A. and Hemley, G. 1988. The ups and downs of the crocodilian skin trade. WWF-TRAFFIC Newsletter, 8 (1), 14.Google Scholar
Glasser, J.W. 1979. The role of predation in shaping and maintaining the structure of communities. Am. Nat. 113, 631–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorzula, S. 1987. The management of crocodilians in Venezuela. In Wildlife Management: Crocodiles and Alligators (eds Webb, G. J. W., Manolis, S. C. and Whitehead, P. J.), pp. 91–101. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Chipping Norton.Google Scholar
Hall, P.M. 1991. Dangerous to man? A record of an attack by a black caiman (Melanosuchus niger) Guyana. Herp. Review, 22 (1), 9–11.Google Scholar
Herron, J.C. 1991. Growth rates of black caiman Melanosuchus niger and spectacled caiman Caiman crocodilus, and the recruitment of breeders in hunted caiman populations. Biol. Conserv. 55, 103–113.Google Scholar
Magnusson, W.E. 1982. Biological aspects of the conservation of Amazonian crocodilian in Brasil. In Crocodiles: Proceedings of the 5th Working Meeting of the Crocodilian Specialist Group of the Species Survival Commission of IUCN,IUCN,Gland. pp. 108–116.Google Scholar
Magnusson, W.E. 1990. Book review: Crocodiles, by R. Steel. Copeia, 1990, 1185–1187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medem, F. 1980. Caimans and crocodiles – a tale of destruction. Oryx, 15, 390–391.Google Scholar
Mittermeier, R.A., Câmara, I.G., Pádua, M.T.J. and Blanck, J. 1990. Conservation in the Pantanal of Brazil. Oryx, 24, 103–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otte, K.C. 1978. Untersuchungen zur biologie des Mohrenkaiman (Melanosuchus niger Spix 1825) aus dem Nationalpark Manu (Peru): Beitrage zu Morphologie, Physiologie, Ethologie and Okologie, München.Google Scholar
Pereira, N. 1944. A utilização da came do jacaré na Amazônia. Bol. Geogr. Rio de J. 2, 150–152.Google Scholar
Petrere, M. Jr. 1982. Ecology of the Fisheries in the River Amazon and its Tributaries in the Amazonas State (Brazil). PhD thesis, University of East Anglia, Norwich.Google Scholar
Petrere, M. Jr. 1985. A pesca commercial no Rio Solimōes-Amazonas e seus afluentes: análise dos informes do pescado desembarcado no Mercado Municipal de Manaus (1976–1978). Ciência e Cultura, 37, 1987–1999.Google Scholar
Plotkin, M.J., Medem, F., Mittermeier, R.A. and Constable, I.D. 1983. Distribution and conservation of the black caiman Melanosuchus niger. In Advances in Herpetology and Evolutionary Biology (eds Rhodin, A. G. J. and Miyata, K.), pp. 695–705. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Rebêlo, G.H. and Magnusson, W.E. 1983. An analysis of the effect of hunting on Caiman crocodilus and Melanosuchus niger based on the sizes of confiscated skins. Biol Conserv. 26, 95–104.Google Scholar
Smith, N.J.H. 1981. Caimans, capybaras, manatees, and man in Amazonia. Biol. Conserv. 19, 95–104.Google Scholar
Staton, M.A. and Dixon, J.R. 1975. Studies on the dry season biology of Caiman crocodilus crocodilus from the Venezuelan llanos. Mem. Soc. Cienc. Nat. La Salle, 101, 237–264.Google Scholar