Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T21:01:51.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Post-Acousmatic Practice: Re-evaluating Schaeffer’s heritage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2016

Monty Adkins*
Affiliation:
CeReNeM, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate Campus, Huddersfield HD1 3DH
Richard Scott*
Affiliation:
NOVARS Research Centre, Martin Harris Centre for Music and Drama, University of Manchester, Bridgeford Street, Manchester M13 9PL
Pierre Alexandre Tremblay*
Affiliation:
CeReNeM, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate Campus, Huddersfield HD1 3DH

Abstract

This article posits the notion of the post-acousmatic. It considers the work of contemporary practitioners who are indebted to the Schaefferian heritage, but pursue alternative trajectories from the established canonical discourse of acousmatic music. It will outline the authors’ definition of the term and also outline a network of elements such as time, rhythm, pitch, dynamics, noise and performance to discuss work that the authors’ consider to be a critique, an augmentation and an outgrowth of acousmatic music and thinking.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adkins, M. 2014. A Manifesto of Nodalism. Journal of Science and Technology of the Arts 6(1): 5160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, J. 1993. Compositional Strategies in Music for Solo Instruments and Electroacoustic Sounds. Unpublished doctoral thesis, City University, London.Google Scholar
Auslander, P. 2008. Liveness: Performance in a Mediatized Culture. 2nd edn. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayle, F. 1993. Musique acousmatique: propositions ... positions. Paris: Buchet/Chastel.Google Scholar
Berezan, D. 2007. Flux: Live-Acousmatic Performance and Composition. Proceeding of EMS Conference 2007. www.ems-network.org/spip.php?article260 (accessed 24 January 2016).Google Scholar
Boulez, P. 1986. Orientations. Ed. Jean-Jacques Nattiez, trans. Martin Cooper. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chion, M. 2016. Blog. 17 January. http://michelchion.com/blog/81-entre-deux-images-n-31 (accessed 26 January 2016).Google Scholar
Clifton, T. 1983. Music as Heard: A Study in Applied Phenomenology. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Demers, J. 2010. Listening Through the Noise. Oxford: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhomont, F. 1995. Acousmatic Update. Contact! 8(2). http://cec.sonus.ca/contact/contact82Dhom.html (accessed 14 January 2015).Google Scholar
Dhomont, F. 2008. Vers un classicisme de l’écriture acousmatique. Proceedings of EMS Conference 2008. Paris, France, 3–7 June.Google Scholar
Ferreira, G. 1997. A Perceptual Approach to the Analysis of J. C. Risset’s Sud: Sound, Structure and Symbol. Organised Sound 2(2): 97106. www.ems-network.org/ems08/papers/dhomont.pdf (accessed 14 January 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzell, G. 2004. Time-Consciousness and Form in Nonlinear Music. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Hegarty, P. 2007. Noise Music: A History. London: Continuum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, P. 1977. Propos sur le concert. Cahiers recherche/musique No. 5: Le concert pourquoi? Comment? Ed. Michel Chion. Paris: INA-GRM.Google Scholar
Hugill, A. 2008. The Digital Musician. New York/Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kendall, G. 2008. What is an Event? The EVENT Schema, Circumstances, Metaphor and Gist. Proceedings of the ICMC 2008. www.garykendall.net/papers/KendallICMC2008.pdf (accessed 26 January 2016).Google Scholar
La chambre des machines. nd. www.lachambredesmachines.com (accessed 26 January 2016).Google Scholar
Myatt, T. 2008. New Aesthetics and Practice in Experimental Electronic Music. Organised Sound 13(1): 13.Google Scholar
Peignot, J. 1960. De la musique concrète à l’acousmatique. Esprit 280: 111123.Google Scholar
Prensky, M. 2001. Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon 9(5): 16.Google Scholar
Prix, Ars Electronica. 1996. Jury Statement for Digital Music. In H. Leopoldseder and C.Schöpf (eds.) Prix Ars Electronica 96, International Compendium for the Computer Arts. Vienna/New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Prix, Ars Electronica. 1997. Jury Statement for Digital Music. In H. Leopoldseder and C. Schöpf (eds.) Cyberarts: International Compendium for the Computer Arts, Prix Ars Electronica 97. Vienna/New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Silverstone, R. 2002. Complicity and Collusion in the Mediation of Everyday Life. New Literary History 33(4): 761780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, G. 2002. Love Me or Kill Me: Sarah Kane and the Theatre of Extremes (Theatre: Theory, Practice, Performance). Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Savouret, A. 1998. To Young ‘Discoverers’ of Music. Trans. Justice Olsson. Musique Electroacoustique: expérience et prospective (conference proceedings for 4–6 June Bourges). Bourges: Editions Mnemosyne.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, P. 1966. Traité des objets musicaux. Paris: Le Seuil.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, P. 2013. In Search of a Concrete Music. Trans. C. North and J. Dack. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, B. 2000. Music and Memory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stockfelt, O. 2007. Adequate Modes of Listening. In C. Cox and D. Warner (eds.) Audio Culture. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. nd. www.jothomas.me/en/about (accessed 28 January 2016).Google Scholar
Waters, S. 1997. Beyond the Acousmatic: Hybrid Tendencies in Electroacoustic Music. Stockholm: ICEM.Google Scholar
Waters, S. 2003. Thinking the Unheard: Hybrid Thought in Musical Practice. In J. Monks and R. Gullström-Hughes (eds.) Hybrid Thought. Milton Keynes: Open University.Google Scholar