Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T10:45:56.149Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Aesthetics of Musical Complex Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2023

Dario Sanfilippo Open the ORCID record for Dario Sanfilippo [Opens in a new window]
Dario Sanfilippo*
Affiliation:
Researcher, Campobello di Licata, Italy
*
Email: sanfilippo.dario@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article introduces the history and aesthetics of feedback-based music, from early practitioners to more advanced methods and state-of-the-art works based on adaptation. Some of the most relevant techniques developed over almost six decades of investigations in the area of recursive systems for electronic music are discussed to show the variety and richness that a single specialised domain can have, providing examples of how scientific and philosophical principles can be translated into music. The historical context is key to understanding the evolution of the field: feedback-based music arose during the same years in which cybernetics, together with other disciplines, were experiencing a profound transformation. I will provide an overview of how such disciplines changed, highlighting the connections between seemingly distant areas such as philosophy, biology and engineering, and the fact that the development of feedback-based music appears to have followed somewhat closely the evolution of systems thinking. Finally, the article explores questions of musical aesthetics and music theory related to the use of complex autonomous systems in live performance through observations on the author’s creative practice.

Type
Article
Information
Organised Sound , Volume 28 , Issue 3: Ecologically Grounded Creative Practices and Ubiquitous Music – Interaction and Environment , December 2023 , pp. 381 - 391
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ashby, W. R. (1957). An Introduction to Cybernetics. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Barandiaran, X. and Moreno, A. (2006). On What Makes Certain Dynamical Systems Cognitive: A Minimally Cognitive Organisation Program. Adaptive Behavior 14(2): 171–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boner, C. P. and Boner, C. (1966). Behavior of Sound System Response Immediately below Feedback. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 14(3): 200–3.Google Scholar
Bowers, J. (2002). Improvising Machines: Ethnographically Informed Design for Improvised Electro-Acoustic Music. Masters thesis, University of East Anglia.Google Scholar
Brand, S. (1976). For God’s Sake, Margaret: Conversation with Gregory Bateson and Margaret Mead. CoEvolution Quarterly 10: 32–44.Google Scholar
Bridda, E. (2004). Maree Digitali. Sentireascoltare. https://sentireascoltare.com/articoli/fennesz-intervista-maree-digitali/ (accessed 20 June 2019).Google Scholar
Cascone, K. (2000). The Aesthetics of Failure: Post-Digital Tendencies in Contemporary Computer Music. Computer Music Journal 24(4): 12–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, P. R. (1992). A Meta-Wind-Instrument Physical Model, and a Meta-Controller for Real-Time Performance Control. Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference, San Jose, California, 273–6.Google Scholar
Corning, P. A. (2002). The Re-Emergence of Emergence: A Venerable Concept in Search of a Theory. Complexity 7(6): 18–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlstedt, P., Nilsson, P. A. and Robair, G. (2015). The Bucket System: A Computer-Mediated Signalling System for Group Improvisation. Proceeding of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, Baton Rouge, LA, 317–18.Google Scholar
Di Scipio, A. (1994). Formal Processes of Timbre Composition Challenging the Dualistic Paradigm of Computer Music. Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference, Aarhus, 202–8.Google Scholar
Di Scipio, A. (1997). Musica tra determinismo e indeterminismo tecnologico. Musica/Realta, 53: 111–42.Google Scholar
Di Scipio, A. (1998). Questions Concerning Music Technology. Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities 3(2): 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Scipio, A. (2000). Tecnologia dell’esperienza musicale nel Novecento. Rivista Italiana di Musicologia 35(1/2): 211–45.Google Scholar
Di Scipio, A. (2003). ‘Sound is the Interface’: From Interactive to ecosystemic Signal Processing. Organised Sound 8(3): 269–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Scipio, A. and Sanfilippo, D. (2019). Defining Ecosystemic Agency in Live Performance. The Machine Milieu Project as Practice-Based Research. Array Journal 12: 28–43.Google Scholar
Eldridge, A. (2007). Collaborating with the Behaving Machine: Simple Adaptive Dynamical Systems for Generative and Interactive Music. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Eldridge, A. and Kiefer, C. (2017). The Self-Resonating Feedback Cello: Interfacing Gestural and Generative Processes in Improvised Performance. Proceedings of New Interfaces for Music Expression, 25–9.Google Scholar
Eldridge, A., Dorin, A. and McCormack, J. (2008). Manipulating Artificial Ecosystems. Applications of Evolutionary Computing. EvoWorkshops. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4974. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 392–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78761-7_42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etxeberria, A., Julian Merelo, J. and Moreno, A. (1994). Studying Organisms with Basic Cognitive Capacities in Artificial Worlds. Intellectica 18(1): 45–69.Google Scholar
Farmer, J. D. (2002). Market Force, Ecology and Evolution. Industrial and Corporate Change 11(5): 895–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, J. D. and Lafond, F. (2016). How Predictable is Technological Progress? Research Policy 45(3): 647–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feenberg, A. (1992). Subversive Rationalisation: Technology, Power, and Democracy. Inquiry 35(3-4): 301–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forrest, S., Hofmeyr, S. A. and Somayaji, A. (1997). Computer Immunology. Communications of the ACM 40(10): 88–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gershenson, C. (2007). Design and Control of Self-Organizing Systems. Mexico City: CopIt Arxives.Google Scholar
Gershenson, C. and Heylighen, F. (2005). How Can We Think the Complex. Managing Organisational Complexity: Philosophy, Theory and Application 3: 47–62.Google Scholar
Gleick, J. (2011). Chaos: Making a New Science. New York: Open Road Media.Google Scholar
Hamman, M. (2002). From Technical to Technological: The Imperative of Technology in Experimental Music Composition. Perspectives of New Music 40(1): 92–120.Google Scholar
Heylighen, F. (2001). The Science of Self-Organization and Adaptivity. The Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems, 5(3), 253–80.Google Scholar
Heylighen, F. and Joslyn, C. (2001). Cybernetics and Second-Order Cybernetics. Encyclopedia of physical science & technology 4: 155–70.Google Scholar
Holland, J. H. (1975). Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
John, Holland. H. (2014). Complexity: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Karplus, K. and Strong, A. (1983). Digital Synthesis of Plucked-String and Drum Timbres. Computer Music Journal 7(2): 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauffman, S. A. (1984). Emergent Properties in Random Complex Automata. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 10(1–2): 145–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitto, K. J. (2006). Modelling and Generating Complex Emergent Behaviour. PhD thesis, Flinders University, South Australia.Google Scholar
Krakauer, D. C. (2011). Darwinian Demons, Evolutionary Complexity, and Information Maximisation. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science 21(3): 037110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagi, M., Bertrand, K. Z. and Bar-Yam, Y. (2011). The Food Crises and Political Instability in North Africa and the Middle East. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1108.2455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langton, C. G. (1986). Studying Artificial Life with Cellular Automata. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 22(1–3): 120–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maturana, H. R. and Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis: The Organisation of the Living. Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realisation of the Living 42: 59–138.Google Scholar
Morin, E. (1977). La nature de la nature, vol. 123. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Morin, E. (2007). Restricted Complexity, General Complexity. Science and Us: Philosophy and Complexity. Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
Mumma, G. (1967). Creative Aspects of Live-Performance Electronic Music Technology. Papers of 33rd National Convention. New York: Audio Engineering Society.Google Scholar
Patteson, T. (2012). The Time of Roland Kayns Cybernetic Music. Travelling Time, Sonic Acts XIV, 47–67.Google Scholar
Pressing, J. (1984). Cognitive Processes in Improvisation. In Advances in Psychology, vol. 19). Amsterdam: Elsevier, 345–63.Google Scholar
Prigogine, I. and Nicolis, G. (1985). Self-Organisation in Nonequilibrium Systems: Towards a Dynamics of Complexity. In Hazewinkel, M., Jurkovich, R. and Paelinck, J. H. P. (eds.) Bifurcation Analysis. Dordrecht: Springer, 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rocchesso, D. and Smith, J. O. (1997). Circulant and Elliptic Feedback Delay Networks for Artificial Reverberation. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing 5(1): 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rognoni, L. (1966). La musica ‘elettronica’ e il problema della tecnica. In Fenomenologia della musica radicale. Laterza: Bari.Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, F. (1958). The Perceptron: A Probabilistic Model for Information Storage and Organisation in the Brain. Psychological Review 65(6): 386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanfilippo, D. (2013). Turning Perturbation into Emergent Sound, and Sound into Perturbation. Interference: A Journal of Audio Culture 3: 121–31.Google Scholar
Sanfilippo, D. (2018). Time-Variant Infrastructures and Dynamical Adaptivity for Higher Degrees of Complexity in Autonomous Music Feedback Systems: The Order from Noise (2017) Project. Musica/Tecnologia 12(1): 119–29.Google Scholar
Sanfilippo, D. (2020). Complex Musical Behaviours via Time-Variant Audio Feedback Networks and Distributed Adaptation: A Study of Autopoietic Infrastructures for Real-Time Performance Systems. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Sanfilippo, D. (2021a). Complex Adaptation in Audio Feedback Networks for the Synthesis of Music and Sounds. Computer Music Journal 45(1): 6–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanfilippo, D. (2021b). Time-Domain Adaptive Algorithms for Low- and High-Level Audio Information Processing. Computer Music Journal 45(1): 24–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanfilippo, D. (2022). Towards the Formalisation of Performance Modalities and Interfaces in Human-Machine Interaction. Echo, a journal of music, thought, and technology, 3.Google Scholar
Sanfilippo, D. and Di Scipio, A. (2017). Environment-Mediated Coupling of Autonomous Sound-Generating Systems in Live Performance: An Overview of the Machine Milieu project. Proceedings of the 14th Sound and music Computing Conference, Espoo, Finland, 5–8.Google Scholar
Sanfilippo, D. and Valle, A. (2013). Feedback Systems: An Analytical Framework. Computer Music Journal 37(2): 12–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steels, L. (1997). The Synthetic Modeling of Language Origins. Evolution of Communication 1(1): 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steels, L. (2003). Evolving Grounded Communication for Robots. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(7): 308–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vemuri, V. (2014). Modeling of Complex Systems: An Introduction. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
von Foerster, H. (1952). Cybernetics; Circular Causal and Feedback Mechanisms in Biological and Social Systems. Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation.Google Scholar
von Foerster, H. (2003). Cybernetics of Cybernetics. In Understanding Understanding. New York: Springer, 283–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Glasersfeld, E. (1979). Cybernetics, Experience, and the Concept of Self. In Ozer, M. N. (ed.) A Cybernetic Approach to the assessment of Children: Toward a More Humane Use of Human Beings. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 67–113.Google Scholar
Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. Cambridge, CA: MIT Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Wilensky, U. and Rand, W. (2015). An Introduction to Agent-Based Modeling: Modeling Natural, Social, and Engineered Complex Systems with NetLogo. Cambridge, CA: MIT Press.Google Scholar