Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T06:51:51.181Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effects of Commodity Program Participation on Bidding in the Conservation Reserve Program

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Michael R. Dicks ,
Patricia L. Riely  and
Shayle D. Shagam
Michael R. Dicks
Affiliation:
Economic Research Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture
Patricia L. Riely
Affiliation:
Economic Research Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture
Shayle D. Shagam
Affiliation:
Economic Research Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture
Get access

Abstract

An analysis of Conservation Reserve Program contracts obtained during the 1986 sign-up periods indicates commodity program participants enrolled more acreage at higher costs than farmers not participating in other commodity programs. Significant differences also occurred between the various commodity program crops, reflecting the difference in benefits available for these crops.

Type
Articles
Information
Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , October 1987 , pp. 144 - 152
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bogess, William G. “Implementing the Conservation Reserve Provisions: Potential Risks Facing Farmers.” In: Risk Analysis for Agricultural Production Firms: Implications for Managers, Policymakers, and Researchers. Proceedings of a seminar sponsored by Southern Regional Project S-180, “An Economic Analysis of Risk Management Strategies for Agricultural Production Firms,” Tampa, Florida. March 23-26, 1986.Google Scholar
Boggess, William G. “Analyzing CRP Bidding Behavior Under Uncertainty: A Reliability Criterion Approach.” Presented at the AAEA National Meetings, East Lansing, Michigan. August 3-5, 1987.Google Scholar
Dicks, Michael R. “Conservation Reserve Grows Rapidly,” Agricultural Outlook, AO-124, October, 1986, p. 28.Google Scholar
Dicks, Michael R. “Definitional Consistency for Conservation Provisions of the 1985 Food Security Act.” Washington, D.C., USDA, ERS Staff Report No. AGES861214, 1987.Google Scholar
Dicks, Michael R. et al. “Implementation of the 1985 Farm Bill.” Agricultural Outlook. AO-117, March, 1986, pp. 23–33.Google Scholar
Dvoskin, Dan. “Excess Capacity in U.S. Agriculture. An Economic Approach to Measurement.” Washington, D.C., USDA, ERS Staff Report No. AGES870618, 1987.Google Scholar
Economic Research Service. Agricultural Resources, Outlook and Situation Summary, USDA, April, 1987.Google Scholar
Glaser, Lawrence K. “Provisions of the Food Security Act of 1984,” Agricultural Information Bulletin, No. 498, USDA, Economic Research Service, April, 1986.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. and Short, S. D. “Price and Income Support and the Distribution of Farm Related Incomes: Observations from Southern Grain and Cotton Farms.” Paper presented at SAEA Annual Meeting, Atlanta, Georgia, February 6-9, 1983.Google Scholar
Magleby, Richard and Dicks, Michael R. “Soil Conservation,” Agricultural Resources; Cropland, Water, and Conservation Situation and Outlook Report, AR-8, October, 1987, pp. 8–14.Google Scholar
Miller, T. A. “Estimating the Income Supplement in the Farm Program Payments.” Washington, D.C., USDA, ERS Technical Bulletin No. 1492, March, 1974.Google Scholar
Soth, Lauren. “Conservation Reserve Might Work,” Agweek, October 6, 1986, p. 50.Google Scholar
Vermeer, J. “An Economic Appraisal of the 1961 Feed Grain Program.” Washington, D.C., USDA, ERS AER No. 3, June, 1963.Google Scholar