Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T03:45:58.455Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Critical Review of the Travel Cost, Hedonic Travel Cost, and Household Production Models for Measurement of Quality Changes in Recreational Experiences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Darrell Hueth
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon
Elizabeth J. Strong
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon
Get access

Extract

This paper compares three recreation valuation techniques—the travel cost (TC), the hedonic travel cost (HTC), and the household production (HP) techniques—on the basis of their theoretical underpinnings, econometric and data considerations, and policy considerations. The major focus is on how these techniques can be used to evaluate the benefits to recreationists of changes in the quality of recreation sites. Bockstael and McConnell's (1981) formulation of the HP model for sport fishing is used in the following discussion. Other variants, such as the model used by Smith et al. (1983), are only briefly mentioned.

Type
AAEA/NAREA Invited Session: Measuring the Economic Value of Outdoor Recreation and Other Environmental Amenities
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bockstael, Nancy E. and McConnell, Kenneth E.Theory and Estimation of the Household Production Function for Wildlife Recreation.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 8 (1981):199214.Google Scholar
Bockstael, Nancy E. and McConnell, Kenneth E.Welfare Measurement in the Household Production Framework.” American Economic Review 73 (1983):806814.Google Scholar
Bowes, Michael D. and Loomis, John B.A Note on the Use of Travel Cost Models with Unequal Zonal Populations.” Land Economics 56 (1980):465470.Google Scholar
Brown, William G. and Nawas, Farid. “Impact of Aggregation on the Estimation of Outdoor Recreation Demand Equations.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 55 (1973):246249.Google Scholar
Brown, William G., Sorhus, Colin, Chou-Yang, Bih-lian, and Richards, Jack A.Using Individual Observations to Estimate Recreation Demand Functions: A Caution.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 65 (1983):154157.Google Scholar
Brown, William G. and Sorhus, Colin. “On Estimating Values of Sport-caught Fish with Application to Oregon Salmon and Steelhead.” Unpublished manuscript, 1981.Google Scholar
Deaton, Agnus and Muellbauer, John. Economics and Consumer Behavior. London: Cambridge University press, 1980.Google Scholar
Gum, Russell L. and Martin, William E.Problems and Solutions in Estimating the Demand for and Value of Rural Outdoor Recreation.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 57 (1975):558566.Google Scholar
Muellbauer, John. “Household Production Theory, Quality, and the ‘Hedonic Technique’.” American Economic Review 64 (1974):977994.Google Scholar
Rosen, Sherwin. “Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition.” Journal of Political Economy 82 (1974):3455.Google Scholar
Smith, V. Kerry, Desvousges, William H., and McGivney, Matthew P.Estimating Water Quality Benefits: An Econometric Analysis.” Southern Economic Journal 50 (1983):422437.Google Scholar
Strong, Elizabeth J.Measuring Benefits of Outdoor Recreation Services: An Application of the Household Production Function Approach to the Oregon Steelhead Sport Fisher.” . Oregon State University, Corvallis, 1983.Google Scholar
Ward, Frank A.Some Considerations in the Specification of the Price Variable in Travel Cost Demand Models for Outdoor Recreation.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar