Adrian, Lin, Johansen, Louise Victoria, Kjær, Anne Lise & Kjær, Katrine Meldgaard. 2014. Imagining law: A pilot study of entering law students' discourse about law, legal education and legal professions. Retfærd 3, 63–85.
Anderson, Stanley. 1990. Lay Judges and Jurors in Denmark. American Journal of Comparative Law 38, 839–864.
Anesa, Patrizia. 2012. Jury Trials and the Popularization of Legal Language: A Discourse Analytical Approach. Bern New York: Peter Lang.
Atkinson, John & Drew, Paul. 1979. Order in Court: The Organization of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
Blückert, Ann. 2015. Juridikstudenters språkliga inskolning. In Kjær, Anne Lise, Adrian, Lin, Cederstrøm, Cecilie B., Engberg, Jan, Gabrielsen, Jonas, Rosenmeier, Morten & Schaumburg-Müller, Steen (eds.), Retten i sproget. Samspillet mellem ret og sprog i juridisk praksis. Copenhagen: Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlag.
Chase, Susan. 1995. Taking narratives seriously: Consequences for method and theory. In Josselson, Ruthellen & Lieblich, Amia (eds.), Interpreting Experience: The Narrative Study of Lives, 1–26. London: Sage.
Conley, John M. & O'Barr, William. 1990. Rules versus Relationships: The Ethnography of Legal Discourse. Chicago, IL & London: University of Chicago Press.
Conley, John M., O'Barr, William M. & Allan Lind, E.. 1978. The Power of Language: Presentational Style in the Courtroom. Duke Law Journal 1978, 1375–1399.
Conley, Robin H. & Conley, John M.. 2009. Stories from the jury room: How jurors use narrative to process evidence. Studies in Law, Politics and Society 49, 25–56.
Diamond, Shari, Vidmar, Neil, Rose, Mary & Ellis, Leslie. 2003. Inside the jury room: Evaluating juror discussions during trial. Judicature 87 (2), 54–59.
Diesen, Christian. 1996. Lekmän som domare. Stockholm: Juristförlaget.
Eyben, W. E. v. 1969. Den danske retspleje vurderet af ikke-jurister. In Borum, O. A., Graff, A. & Eyben, W. E. v. (eds.), Retsplejeloven gennem 50 år. Copenhagen: Juristforbundet.
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity.
Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing Discourse, Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
Flango, V. E. 1980. Would jurors do a better job if they could take notes? Judicature 63, 436–443.
Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Geertz, Clifford. 1983. Local Knowledge, Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
Hans, Valerie P. 2003. Introduction: Lay participation in legal decision making. Law & Policy 25, 83–92.
Heffer, Chris. 2008. The language and communication of jury instructions. In Gibbons, John & Turell, Teresa (eds.), Dimensions of Forensic Linguistics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Heffer, Chris, Rock, Frances & Conley, John M. (eds.). 2013. Legal–lay Communication: Textual Travels in The Law. New York: Oxford University Press.
Heuer, Larry & Penrod, Steven [D.]. 1988. Increasing jurors' participation in trials. Law and Human Behavior 12, 231–261.
Heuer, Larry & Penrod, Steven D.. 1989. Instructing jurors. Law and Human Behavior 13, 409–430.
Hymes, Dell. 1971. Sociolinguistics and the ethnography of speaking. In Ardener, Edward (ed.), Social Anthropology and Language, 47–94. London: Tavistock.
Johansen, Louise Victoria. 2017. Fra novice til oldtimer – domsmandsrollen som læringsproces. Nordisk Tidsskrift for Kriminalvidenskab 104, 241–258.
Kuhn, Deanna, Weinstock, Michael & Flaton, Robin. 1994. How well do jurors reason? Competence dimensions of individual variation in a juror reasoning task. Psychological Science 5, 289–296.
Kutnjak Ivković, S. 2015. Ears of the deaf: The theory and reality of lay judges in mixed tribunals. Chicago–Kent Law Review 90, 1031–1067.
Lave, Jean & Wenger, Etienne. 1991. Situated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lundmark, Thomas. 2012. Lay Judges and Juries: Charting the Divide between Common and Civil Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Machura, Steven. 2011. Silent lay judges: Why their influence in the community falls short of expectations. Chicago–Kent Law Review 86, 769–788.
Malsch, Marijke. 2009. Democracy in the Courts: Lay Participation in European Criminal Justice Systems. Farnham: Ashgate.
Manzo, John F. 1994. You wouldn't take seven-year-old and ask him all these questions: Jurors' use of practical reasoning in supporting their arguments. Law and Social Inquiry 19 (3), 639–666.
McLaughlin, M. A. 1982. Questions to witnesses and notetaking by the jury as aids in understanding complex litigation. New England Law Review 18, 687–713.
Merry, Sally Engle. 1990. Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness Among Working-Class Americans. Chicago, IL & London: University of Chicago Press.
Mertz, Elisabeth. 2007. The Language of Law School: Learning to “Think Like a Lawyer”. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mortensen, Sune Sønderberg & Mortensen, Janus. 2017. Epistemic stance in courtroom interaction. In Poggi, Francesca & Capone, Alessandro (eds.), Pragmatics and Law: Practical and Theoretical Perspectives, 401–437. Cham: Springer.
O'Barr, William M. 1982. Linguistic Evidence: Language, Power, and Strategy in The Courtroom. New York: Academic Press.
Pennington, Nancy & Hastie, Reid. 1991. A cognitive theory of juror decision making: The story model. Cardozo Law Review 13, 519–557.
Philips, Susan [U]. 1988. The language socialization of lawyers: Acquiring the “cant”. In Spindler, George (ed.), Doing the Ethnography of Schooling: Educational Anthropology in Action, 176–209. Prospect Heights, NY: Waveland.
Philips, Susan U. 1993. Evidentiary standards for American trials: Just the facts. In Hill, Jane H. & Irvine, Judith T. (eds.), Responsibility and Evidence in Oral Discourse, 248–259. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Philips, Susan U. 2010. Identity construction in powerful institutions: A commentary. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies 7, 230–235.
Piecker, Shelley C. & Worthington, Debra. 2003. The influence of opening statement/closing argument organizational strategy on juror verdict and damage awards. Law and Human Behavior 27, 437–456.
Sarat, Austin & Felstiner, William L. F.. 1995. Divorce Lawyers and their Clients: Power and Meaning in the Legal Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tamm, Ditlev. 2008. Scandinavian Law. In Cane, Peter & Conaghan, Joanne (ed.), The New Oxford Companion to Law, 195–196. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Warren, Joshua, Kuhn, Deanna & Weinstock, Michael. 2010. How do jurors argue with one another? Judgment and Decision Making 5, 64.
Wilhjelm, Preben. 1988. Folkevalgte dommere. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.
Woolard, Kathryn A. & Schieffelin, Bambi B.. 1994. Language ideology. Annual Review of Anthropology 23, 55–82.