No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Stress and Accent in Swedish
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 December 2008
Abstract
A generative account of stress and accent in Swedish is developed. Contrary to traditional assumptions, Accent I and Accent II are not considered primitive categories, nor, as in earlier generative treatments, a feature of words. Rather, the accents are described in terms of universal features of pitch, which are assigned to words whose stress patterns are fully determined. Although the pitch rules differ from one dialect to another, the stress rules are substantially the same in all dialects.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980
References
REFERENCES
Bresnan, , Joan, 1971: Sentence Stress and Syntactic Transformations. Language 47, 257–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, , Noam, and Halle, , Morris, 1968: The Sound Pattern of English. Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
Elert, , Claes-Christian, 1970: Ljud och Ord i Svenskan. Almqvist and Wiksell, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Elert, , Claes-Chrisatian, 1972: Tonality in Swedish: Rules and a List of Minimal Paris. In Firchow, , Evelyn, et al. (eds.) 1972: Studies for Einar Haugen. Mouton, The Hague, pp. 151–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gårding, , Eva, 1973: The Scandinavian Word Accents. Working Papers 8, Phonetics Laboratory, Lund University.Google Scholar
Halle, , Morris, 1973: Stress Rules in English: a New Version. Linguistic Inquiry 4, 451–464.Google Scholar
Halle, , Morris, and Stevens, , Kenneth, 1971: A Note on Laryngeal Features. Quarterly Progress Report 101, Research Laboratory of Electronics, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Halpern, A. M. 1946a: Yuma I: Phonology. International Journal of American Linguistics 12, 25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halpern, A. M.. 1946b: Yama II: Morphophonemics. International Journal of American Linguistics 12, 147–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, , Larry, 1977: On the Nature of Linguistic Stress. In Hyman, , Larry, (ed.) 1977: Studies in Stress and Accent. Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics 4, Department of Linguistics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Jensen, , John, 1974: A Constraint on Variables in Phonology. Language 50, 675–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, , John, 1975: Accent in Swedish: Prosodic or segmental? Read at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Kean, , Mary-Louise, 1974: The Strict Cycle in Phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 5, 179–203.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, , Paul, 1973: The Inflectional Accent of Indo-European. Language 49, 794–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lado, , Robert, 1957: Linguistics Across Cultures. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Linell, , Per, 1971: Synpunkter på Betonings Roll i Svenskans Prosodi. Unpublished MS, Uppsala University.Google Scholar
Linell, , Per, 1972: Remarks on Swedish Morphology. Report from Uppsala University Department of Linguistics 1.Google Scholar
Linell, , Per, , Svensson, , Bengt, and öhman, , Sven, 1971: Ljudstruktur: Inledning till Fonologin och Särdragsteorin. C. W. K. Gleerups Förlag, Lund.Google Scholar
McCawley, , James, 1968: The Phonological Component of a Grammar of Japanese. Mouton, The Hague.Google Scholar
Pike, , Kenneth, and Kindberg, W.. 1956: A problem in multiple Stresses. Word 12, 415–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, , Masayoshi, 1972: The Non-Cyclic Nature of Japanese Accentuation. Language 48, 584–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanderslice, , Ralph, and Ladefoged, , Peter, 1972: Binary Suprasegmental Features. Language 48, 819–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
öhman, , Sven, 1967: Word and Sentence Intonation: A Quantitative Model. Quarterly Progress and Status Reports 2–3 * 1967, Royal Institute of Technology, Speech Transmission Laboratory, Stockholm.Google Scholar