Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T04:22:04.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sten Vikner: Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages. (Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax). New York/ Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995, x + 294 pp.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2010

Alessandro Lenci
Alessandro Lenci
Affiliation:
Scuola Normale Superiore, Laboratorio di linguistica, Piazza dei Cavalieri 7, 56126 Pisa, Italy. Email: lenci@alphalinguistica.sns.it
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , June 1998 , pp. 65 - 73
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aarts, B. 1992. Small Clauses in English: The Nonverbal Types. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belletti, A. 1988. The Case of Unaccusatives. Linguistic Inquiry 19, 1–34.Google Scholar
Belletti, A. 1990. Generalized Verb Movement. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
Bennis, H. 1986. Gaps and Dummies. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, J. D. & Jonas, D. 1996. Subject Positions and the Roles of TP. Linguistic Inquiry 27, 195–236.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1986. Knowledge of Language. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1991. Some Notes on Economy of Derivation and Representation. In Freidin, R. (ed.), Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 417–454.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Diesing, M. 1990. Verb Movement and the Subject Position in Yiddish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8, 41–79.Google Scholar
Freeze, R. 1992. Existentials and Other Locatives. Language 68, 553–595.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, T. 1983. The Distribution of Sentential Complements. In Bennis, H. & van LessenKloeke, W. U. S. Kloeke, W. U. S. (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 1983. Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 93–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koster, J. 1978. Why Subject Sentences Don't Exist. In Keyser, S. J. (ed.), Recent Transformational Studies in European Languages. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 53–64.Google Scholar
Moro, A. 1997. The Raising of Predicates: Predicative Noun Phrases and the Theory of Clause Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pollock, J.-Y. 1989. Verb Movement, Universal Grammar, and the Structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20, 365–424.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. 1990. Relativized Minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Safir, K. 1985. Syntactic Chains. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. D. & Vikner, S. 1996. The Verb Always Leaves the IP in V2 Clauses. In Belletti, A. & Rizzi, L. (eds.), Parameters and Functional Heads: Essays in Comparative Syntax. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 11–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar