Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T04:15:42.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

General Purpose Semantics: Hyponymy and Generic Relationships

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Hanne Ruus
Hanne Ruus
Affiliation:
Institut for Nordisk Filologi, Københavns Universitet, Njalsgade 80, DK-2300 København S, Denmark
Get access

Abstract

The paper examines the concept of semantic subordination in terminology and lexical semantics. Although the two traditions differ in their view of language, their inventories of semantic relations are very similar. It is shown that the defining characteristics of the generic relationships from the principles of terminology correspond to most of the salient features of contrast sets. It is argued that the onomasiological dictionaries constitute a valuable collection of data on the semantic relationships in the general language. Examples are given from Dansk Begrebsordbog. It is claimed that the registration of contrast sets is one step towards an operational definition of word sense.

Type
Research Article
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 11 , Issue 1-2 , June 1988 , pp. 111 - 128
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, H. 1945. Dansk Begrebsordbog, Paa Grundlag af Viggo Petersens efterladte Manuskript, Munksgaard, København.Google Scholar
Cruse, D. A. 1986. Lexical Semantics. London, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Descriptive Tools for Electronic Processing of Dictionary Data 1987. Studies in Computational Lexicography by the DANLEX-Group: Ebba Hjorth, Bodil Nistrup Madsen, Ole Norling-Christensen, Jane Rosenkilde Jacobsen, Hanne Ruus. Lexicographica Series Maior 20, Niemeyer, Tübingen.Google Scholar
DIN 2331. 1980. Begriffssysteme und ihre Darstellung, Deutsche Institut für Normung e.V., Berlin.Google Scholar
Dornseiff, F. 1943. Der deutsche Wortschatz nach Sachgruppen. 3. neubearb. Aufi. Berlin und Leipzig. (4. Auflage 1954. Berlin: De Gruyter & Co.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandy, R. E. 1987. In Defense of Semantic Fields. In LePore, E. (ed.) 1987: New Directions in Semantics. London: Academic Press, pp. 259–280.Google Scholar
Grundtvig, V. 1945. Begrebs-Ordbøger og Begrebs-Ordforskning. In Andersen 1945, pp. 1*–32*.Google Scholar
ISO/DIS 704. 1985. Principles and Methods of Terminology, International Organization for Standardization.Google Scholar
Kittay, E. F. 1987. Metaphor, Its Cognitive Force and Linguistic Structure. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Leech, G. 1981. Semantics. The Study of Meaning. Second edition. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Lehrer, A. 1974. Semantic Fields and Lexical Structure. Amsterdam, London: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. 1963. Structural Semantics. An Analysis of Part of the Vocabulary of Plato. Publications of the Philological Society XX. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. 1977. Semantics I–TI. Cambridge, London, New York, Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ordbog over det Danske Sprog 1918–56. Udgivet af Det danske Sprog- og Litteraturseiskab. Vols. I–XXVIH. København: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Picht, H. 1982. Grundelemente der Terminologielehre: Begriff und Begriffssystem. In Arntz, R. and Picht, H.Einfuhrung in die ubersetzungsbezagene Terminologiearbeit. Hildesheim, Zurich, New York: Georg Olms Verlag, pp. 37–108.Google Scholar
Roget's international Thesaurus 1977. Fourth Revised by Chapman, R. L.. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Roget's Thesaurus of English Words and Phrases, 1978. New Edition Completely Revised, Modernized and Abridged by Dutch, R. A.. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Widell, P. 1986. Appendix, B, in Report to The Danish Council of Research in the Humanities on the project: Semantisk strukturering af definerende ordforråd.Google Scholar
Widell, P. 1988. A Model for Constructing the Basic Categories in a Natural Language Thesaurus. To appear in Proceedings from the Fourth International Symposium on Lexicography, Copenhagen, 04 20–22.Google Scholar
Wüster, E. 1985. Einfuhrung in die aligemeine Terminologielehre und terminologische Lexikographie, 2. Auflage herausgegeben vom Fachsprachlichen Zentrum, Handelshochschule Kopenhagen (1. Auflage: 1979, Band 8 der Schriftenreihe der Technischen Universitat Wien).Google Scholar