Skip to main content Accessibility help

Flexibility of frequent clause openers in talk-in-interaction: Det ‘it, that’ and ‘then’ in the prefield in Danish

  • Rasmus Puggaard (a1)


Through in-depth analysis of the use of det ‘it, that’ and ‘then’ occupying the first clausal position (the prefield) in Danish talk-in-interaction, this paper investigates how speakers use highly flexible linguistic elements to their advantage when commencing clauses in real time. These particular words are useful when occupying the prefield, because their flexible nature means that they can be used even when speakers do not have a full format ready for the carrier clause, as long as they have some idea of the interactional purpose of the clause and its information structural prerequisites. The dominating frequency of the most frequent clause openers goes largely unmentioned in previous accounts of the prefield, and the use of det ‘it, that’ and ‘then’ challenges the popular notion that the textually unmarked prefield is also the grammatical subject of the carrier clause.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Flexibility of frequent clause openers in talk-in-interaction: Det ‘it, that’ and ‘then’ in the prefield in Danish
      Available formats

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Flexibility of frequent clause openers in talk-in-interaction: Det ‘it, that’ and ‘then’ in the prefield in Danish
      Available formats

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Flexibility of frequent clause openers in talk-in-interaction: Det ‘it, that’ and ‘then’ in the prefield in Danish
      Available formats


This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (, which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Corresponding author

Email for correspondence:


Hide All
Auer, Peter. 2000. On-line-syntax. Oder: was er bedeuten könnte, die Zeitlichkeit der mündlichen Sprache ernst zu nehmen [Online syntax, or: What it could mean to take the temporality of spoken language first]. In Heringer, Hans-Jürgen, Jäger, Ludwig, Kurz, Gerhard & Stötzel, Georg (eds.), Die Medialität der Gesprochenen Sprache [The mediality of spoken language], special issue of Sprache und Litteratur 85, 4356.
Auer, Peter. 2009. On-line syntax: Thoughts on the temporality of spoken language. Language Sciences 31, 113.
Bohnacker, Ute & Lindgren, Josefin. 2014. Fundament, formellt subjekt och frekvens. Ordföljdsmönster i svenska, nederländska och hos vuxna inlärare av svenska [Prefields, expletive subjects and frequency: Word order patterns in native Swedish and Dutch and in adult learners of Swedish]. Språk & Stil 24, 3371.
Bohnacker, Ute & Rosén, Christina. 2008. The clause-initial position in L2 German declaratives. Transfer of information structure. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 30(4), 511538.
Bouma, Gerlof Johannes. 2008. Starting a Sentence in Dutch: A Corpus-Study of Subject- and Object-Fronting (Groningen Dissertations in Linguistics 66). Ph.D. dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
Brøcker, Karen Kiil, Hamann, Magnus Glenvad Tind, Jørgensen, Maria, Lange, Simon Bierring, Mikkelsen, Nicholas & Steensig, Jakob. 2012. Samtalesprogets grammatik. Fire fænomener og nogle metodiske overvejelser [The grammar of conversational language: Four phenomena and some methodical considerations]. In Dansk talesprog [Danish spoken language], special issue of Nydanske Sprogstudier 42, 1040.
Brøcker, Karen Kiil. 2014. Tunge led i forfelt og ekstraposition. Et fænomen i dansk talesprogsgrammatik [Heavy constituents in prefield and extraposition: A phenomenon in the grammar of spoken Danish]. Skrifter om Samtalegrammatik 1(2).
Brøndal, Viggo. 1928. Ordklasserne– partes orationes. Studier over de sproglige kategorier. [Parts of speech: Studies of the linguistic categories.] Copenhagen: G.E.C. Gad.
Buhl, L. 2004. Tilegnelsen af inversion i fremsættende sætninger i dansk som andetsprog. En analyse af et undervisningsmateriales behandling af inversion i fremsættende sætninger og af 10 andetsprogslearneres arbejde med materialet [The acquisition of inversion in indicative clauses in Danish as a second language: An analysis of the treatment of inversion in indicative clauses in an educational material and in the work with the material by 10 second language learners]. Master’s thesis, Aarhus University.
Comrie, Bernard. 1986. Conditionals: A typology. In Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, Meulen, Alice ter, Reilly, Judy Snitzer & Ferguson, Charles A. (eds.), On Conditionals, 7799. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Comrie, Bernard, Haspelmath, Martin & Bickel, Balthasar. 2015. The Leipzig Glossing Rules: Conventions for interlinear morpheme-by-morpheme glosses. (accessed 1 October 2018.)
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Selting, Margaret. 2001. Introducing Interactional Linguistics. In Selting, Margaret & Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth (eds.), Studies in Interactional Linguistics (Studies in Discourse and Grammar 10), 122. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Selting, Margaret. 2018. Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Diderichsen, Paul. 1946. Elementær dansk grammatik [Elementary Danish grammar]. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.
Diderichsen, Paul. 1962. Elementær dansk grammatik [Elementary Danish grammar], 3rd edn. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.
Dik, Simon C. 1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part 1: The Structure of the Clause, 2nd edn. (Functional Grammar Series 20). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Drach, Erich. 1940. Grundgedanken der deutschen Satzlehre [Basic ideas of German syntax], 2nd edn. Frankfurt am Main: Verlages Moritz Diesterweg.
Dryer, Matthew S. 2013. Order of subject, object and verb. In Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Du Bois, John W. 1987. The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 63(4), 805855.
Du Bois, John W. 2003. Discourse and grammar. In Tomasello (ed.), 47–87.
Emmertsen, Sofie & Heinemann, Trine. 2010. Realization as a device for remedying problems of affiliation in interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 43(2), 109132.
Faarlund, Jan Terje, Lie, Svein & Vannebo, Kjell Ivar. 1997. Norsk referansegrammatikk [Norwegian reference grammar]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Fabricius-Hansen, Cathrine & Solfjeld, Kåre. 1994. Deutsche und norwegische Sachprosa im Vergleich. Ein Arbeitsbericht [German and Norwegian nonfiction in comparison: Work-in-progress report] (Arbeitsberichte des Germanischen Institut der Universität Oslo 6). Oslo: University of Oslo.
Firbas, Jan. 1971. On the concept of communicative dynamism in the theory of functional sentence perspective. Studia Minora Facultatis Philosophicae Universitatis Brunensis 19, 135144.
Ford, Cecilia E., Fox, Barbara A. & Thompson, Sandra A.. 2003. Social interaction and grammar. In Tomasello, (ed.), 119–144.
Ford, Cecilia E. & Thompson, Sandra A.. 1996. Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In Ochs, et al. (eds.), 134–184.
Forsskåhl, Mona. 2008. Konstruktioner i interaktion. De e som resurs i samtal [Constructions in interaction: ‘It is’ as a resource in conversations]. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Helsinki.
Fox, Barbara A. & Thompson, Sandra A.. 2010. Responses to wh-questions in English conversation.Research on Language and Social Interaction 43(2), 133156.
Garly, Katrine. 2018. æv bæv. Et samtaleanalytisk indblik i vurderinger i, danske, naturlige samtaler [‘boo hoo’: A conversation analytic insight into assessments in Danish natural conversations]. Master’s thesis, Aarhus University.
Geeraerts, Dirk. 1993. Vagueness’s puzzles, polysemy’s vagaries. Cognitive Linguistics 4, 223272.
Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goodwin, Charles & Goodwin, Marjorie Harness. 1987. Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments. IPRA Papers in Pragmatics 1(1), 154.
Grimes, Joseph H. 1975. The Thread of Discourse. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.
Haiman, John. 1978. Conditionals are topics. Language 54(3), 564589.
Hakulinen, Auli, Vilkuna, Maria, Korhonen, Riitta, Koivisto, Vesa, Heinonen, Tarja-Riitta & Alho, Irja. 2004. Iso suomen kielioppi [Grammar of Finnish]. Helsinki: Kotimaisten kielten tutkimuskeskus.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1967. Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 2. Journal of Linguistics 3(2), 199244.
Hamann, Magnus Glenvad Tind, Kragelund, Mathias Høyer & Mikkelsen, Nicholas Hedegaard. 2012. Konversationsanalysen som værktøj til analyse af sproglig variation [Conversation Analysis as a tool for the analysis of linguistic variation]. In Heegård, Jan & Henrichsen, Peter Juel (eds.), Speech in Action (Copenhagen Studies in Language 42), 219242. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.
Hammarberg, Björn & Viberg, Åke. 1977. The place-holder constraint, language typology, and the teaching of Swedish to immigrants. Studia Linguistica 31(2), 106163.
Hansen, Aage. 1933. Sætningen og dens led i moderne dansk [The clause and its constituents in modern Danish]. Copenhagen: Arnold Busck.
Hansen, Aage. 1967. Moderne dansk II. Sprogbeskrivelse [Modern Danish II: Language description]. Copenhagen: Grafisk Forlag.
Hansen, Erik & Heltoft, Lars. 2011. Grammatik over det danske sprog [A Grammar of the Danish language]. Odense: Syddansk Universitetsforlag.
Heltoft, Lars. 1986. Topologi og syntaks. En revision af Paul Diderichsens sætningsskema. [Topology and syntax: A revision of Paul Diderichsen’s clause schema]. In Heltoft, Lars & Andersen, John E. (eds.), Sætningsskemaet og dets stilling– 50 år efter [The clause schema and its position– 50 years later], special issue of Nydanske studier & Almen kommunikationsteori 16/17, 105130.
Heritage, John C. & Watson, D. R.. 1979. Formulations as conversational objects. In Psathas, George (ed.), Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, 123162. New York: Irvington.
Hopper, Paul J. 2011. Emergent grammar and temporality in Interactional Linguistics. In Auer, Peter & Pfänder, Stefan (eds.), Constructions. Emerging and Emergent (Linguae & Litterae 6), 2244. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A.. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56(2), 251299.
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A.. 1984. The discourse basis for lexical categories in universal grammar. Language 60(4), 703752.
Houser, Michael J., Mikkelsen, Line & Toosarvandani, Maziar. 2007. Verb phrase pronominalization in Danish: Deep or surface anaphora? In Bainbridge, Erin & Agbayani, Brian (eds.), Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth Western Conference on Linguistics (WECOL 17), 183195. Fresno, CA: California State University.
Jakobsen, Lisbeth Falster. 1995. Sentence intertwining in Danish, seen from a Functional Grammar perspective. In Devriendt, Betty, Goossens, Louis & van der Auwera, Johan (eds.), Complex Structures: A Functionalist Perspective (Functional Grammar Series 17), 6192. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Jefferson, Gail. 1983. On a failed hypothesis: ‘Conjunctionals’ as overlap-vulnerable. In Jefferson, Gail (ed.), Two Explorations of the Organization of Overlapping Talk in Conversation, special issue of Tilburg Papers in Language and Literature 28, 133.
Jefferson, Gail. 1990. List-construction as a task and resource. In Psathas, George (ed.), Interaction Competence (Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis 1), 6393. Lanham, MD & London: University Press of America.
Jefferson, Gail. 2004. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Lerner, Gene H. (ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation (Pragmatics & Beyond 125), 1331. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jensen, Anne K. 2002. Sætningsknuder i dansk [Sentence intertwining in Danish]. Nydanske Sprogstudier 29, 105124.
Jensen, Anne K. 2003. Clause linkage in spoken Danish. 2 vols. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Copenhagen.
Jensen, Eva Skafte. 2015. Subjektellipse eller informationsstrukturel organisering i sms [Subject ellipsis or information structural organization in text messaging]. In Hansen, Inger Schoonderbek & Hougaard, Tina Thode (eds.), 15. møde om udforskningen af dansk sprog [15th Meeting on the Exploration of the Danish Language], 171188. Aarhus: Aarhus University.
Jensen, Per Anker. 2012. Grænsefladen mellem fonologi og syntaks. Evidens fra er-kontraktion [The interface between phonology and syntax: Evidence from er-contraction]. Dansk talesprog [Danish spoken language], special issue of Nydanske Sprogstudier 42, 92115.
Jensen, Torben Juel. 2011. Ordstilling i ledsætninger i moderne dansk talesprog [Word order of subordinate clauses in modern Danish spoken language]. Ny forskning i grammatik 18, 123150.
Johannessen, Janne Bondi. 2014. Left dislocation in main and subordinate clauses. Nordic Atlas of Language Structures Journal 1, 406414.
Jørgensen, Henrik. 2013. Sætningsspidsens udfyldning. Observationer fra et talesprogsmateriale [Filling in the sentence edge: Observations from a spoken language material]. Ny forskning i grammatik 20, 183202.
Jørgensen, Henrik. 2016. Doubling left syntactic positions in Danish. In Vikner, Sten, Jørgensen, Henrik & Gelderen, Elly van (eds.), Let Us Have Articles Betwixt Us: Papers in Historical and Comparative Linguistics in Honour of Johanna L. Wood, 281298. Aarhus: Aarhus University.
Kappelgaard, Sofie Bräuner & Hjorth, Hannah Bruun. 2017. Det stærkeste køn. En undersøgelse af genusrealisering i dansk blandt teenagere i flersprogede miljøer i Køge og på Amager [The strongest sex: An investigation of gender realization in Danish among teenagers in multilingual environments in Køge and on Amager] (Københavnerstudier i tosprogethed 75). Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.
Kragelund, Mathias Høyer. 2015. Når ‘er’ ikke er der. En morfologisk undersøgelse af et dansk talesprogsfænomen [When ‘be’ isn’t there: A morphological investigation of a Danish spoken language phenomenon]. Skrifter om Samtalegrammatik 2(5).
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and the Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 71). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. II: Descriptive Application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1995. The symbolic alternative. In Kardela, Henryk & Persson, Gunnar (eds.), New Trends in Semantics and Lexicography, 89188. Umeå: Swedish Science Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. 2001. Discourse in Cognitive Grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 12(2), 143188.
Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Levinson, Stephen C. 1995. Three levels of meaning. In Palmer, F. R. (ed.), Grammar and Meaning: Essays in the Honor of Sir John Lyons, 90115. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, Stephen C. 2000. Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Boston, MA: The MIT Press.
Lindström, Jan. 2008. Tur och ordning. Introduktion till svensk samtalsgrammatik [Turn and sequence: Introduction to the grammar of conversational Swedish]. Stockholm: Norstedts Akademiske Förlag.
Lindström, Jan. 2009. Interactional Linguistics. In D’hondt, Sigurd, Östman, Jan-Ola & Verschueren, Jef (eds.), The Pragmatics of Interaction (Handbook of Pragmatics Highlights 4), 96103. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Linell, Per. 2005. The Written Language Bias in Linguistics: Its Nature, Origins and Transformations (Routledge Advances in Communication and Linguistic Theory). London & New York: Routledge.
MacWhinney, Brian & Wagner, Johannes. 2010a. Sam2 corpus. doi: 10.21415/T5B88Z.
MacWhinney, Brian & Wagner, Johannes. 2010b. Transcribing, searching and data sharing. The CLAN software and the TalkBank data repository. Gesprächsforschung 11, 154173.
Mathesius, Vilém. 1929. Zur Satzperspektive im modernen Englisch [Sentence perspective in modern English]. Archiv für das Studium der neueren Sprachen und Literaturen 155, 202210.
Michaelis, Laura A. & Lambrecht, Knud. 1996. Towards a construction-based theory of language function: The case of nominal extraposition. Language 72(2), 215247.
Mikkelsen, Kr. 1911. Dansk ordföjningslære med sproghistoriske tillæg. Håndbog for viderekomne og lærere [Danish syntax with diachronic additions: Handbook for intermediate students and teachers]. Copenhagen: Lehmann & Stages Forlag.
Mikkelsen, Nicholas Hedegaard. 2011. Betydningsforskelle ved brug af helsætningsordstilling efter fordi [Meaning differences in the use of main clause word order following ‘because’]. In Hansen, Inger Schoonderbek & Widell, Peter (eds.), 13. møde om udforskningen af dansk sprog [13th Meeting on the Exploration of the Danish Language], 213224. Aarhus: Aarhus University.
Nielsen, Niels Åge. 1975. Om anvendelsen af to forskellige modeller på dansk sætningsbygning [On the use of two different models on Danish sentence formation]. At færdes i sproget. Iagttagelser og synspunkter [To move about in language: Observations and points of view], 139150. Copenhagen: Dansk Sprognævn.
Ochs, Elinor, Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Thompson, Sandra A. (eds.). 1996. Interaction and Grammar (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 13). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Platzack, Christer. 1985. A survey of generative analyses of the verb second phenomenon in Germanic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 8, 4973.
Pomerantz, Anita & Heritage, John. 2013. Preference. In Sidnell, Jack & Stivers, Tanya (eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics), 210228. Chicester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Puggaard, Rasmus. 2019. Fundamentfeltet i danske samtaler [The prefield in Danish conversations]. [To appear in Hansen, Inger Schoonderbek, Hougaard, Tina Thode & Goldshtein, Yonatan (eds.), 17. møde om udforskningen af det danske sprog [17th Meeting on the Exploration of the Danish Language]. Aarhus: Aarhus University.]
Rathje, Marianne. 2009. Definition af citater i talesprog [Definition of quotes in spoken language]. Nydanske Sprogstudier 37, 125158.
Rathje, Marianne. 2011. Quotations and quotatives in the speech of three Danish generations. In Gregersen, Frans, Parrott, Jeffrey K. & Quist, Pia (eds.), Language Variation: European Perspectives III (Studies in Language Variation 7), 7181. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Rathje, Marianne. 2013. Dropper lige subjektet. Subjektellipser i kommentarfeltet på [Just dropping the subject: Subject ellipses in the commentary section on]. In Borchman, Simon, Hansen, Inger Schoonderbek, Hougaard, Tina Thode, Togeby, Ole & Widell, Peter (eds.), Gode ord er bedre end guld. Festskrift til Henrik Jørgensen [Good words are better than gold: Festschrift for Henrik Jørgensen], 399414. Aarhus: Aarhus University.
Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Jefferson, Gail. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language 50(4), 696735. 2018. Data. (checked on 1 October 2018).
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1990. On the organization of sequences as a source of “coherence” in talk-in-interaction. In Dorval, Bruce (ed.), Conversational Organization and its Development (Advances in Discourse Processes 38), 5177. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1996. Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In Ochs, et al. (eds.), 52–133.
Selting, Margret. 2007. Lists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction as an interactional resource. In Femø Nielsen, Mie & Wagner, Johannes (eds.), Diversity and Continuity in Conversation Analysis, special issue of Journal of Pragmatics 39, 483526.
Smidt, Hanne Raben. 1971. Udfyldning af fundamentfelter i moderne dansk normalprosa [Filling out prefields in modern Danish ordinary prose]. Master’s thesis, University of Copenhagen.
Steensig, Jakob. 1994. På tur i talens sprog. Om syntaks og taleture i samtaler [Journey in the language of speech: On syntax and turns-at-talk in conversations]. Samtaleanalyse [Conversation Analysis], special issue of Nydanske studier & Almen kommunikationsteori 18, 6383.
Steensig, Jakob. 2001. Sprog i virkeligheden. Bidrag til en interaktionel lingvistik [Language in reality: Contribution to an interactional linguistics]. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
Steensig, Jakob, Brøcker, Karen Kiil, Grønkjær, Caroline, Hamann, Magnus Glenvad Tind, Hansen, Rasmus Puggaard, Jørgensen, Maria, Kragelund, Mathias Høyer, Mikkelsen, Nicholas Hedegaard, Mølgaard, Tina, Pedersen, Henriette Folkmann, Sørensen, Søren Sandager & Tholstrup, Emilie. 2013. The DanTIN project: Creating a platform for describing the grammar of Danish talk-in-interaction. In Heegård, Jan & Henrichsen, Per Juul (eds.), New Perspectives on Speech in Action (Copenhagen Studies in Language 43), 195225. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 54). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Teleman, Ulf, Hellberg, Staffan & Andersson, Erik. 1999. Svenska Akademiens grammatik 4. Satser och meningar [A grammar of the Swedish Academy, vol. 4: Clauses and meanings]. Stockholm: Svenska Akademien.
Thompson, Sandra A., Fox, Barbara A. & Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2015. Grammar in Everyday Talk: Building Responsive Actions (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 31). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thomsen, Ole Nedegaard. 1992. Pronouns, word order, and prosody: Information structuring in preverbal slots in spoken Danish. Copenhagen Working Papers in Linguistics 2, 119232.
Togeby, Ole. 1993. Praxt. Pragmatisk tekstteori [Pragmatic text theory]. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
Tomasello, Michael (ed.). 2003. The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, vol. 2. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Tomlin, Russell S. 1986. Basic Word Order: Functional Principles (Croom Helm Linguistics Seris). London & Sydney: Croom Helm.
Ulbæk, Ib. 2005. Sproglig tekstanalyse. Introduktion til pragmatisk tekstlingvistik [Linguistic text analysis: Introduction to pragmatic text linguistics]. Aarhus: Academica.
Van, Valin, Robert D. Jr. 1993. A synopsis of Role and Reference Grammar. In van Valin, Robert D. Jr. (eds.), Advances in Role and Reference Grammar (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 82), 1161. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. 2005. Exploring the Syntax–Semantics Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vikner, Sten, 1995. Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages (Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Westman, Margareta. 1974. Bruksprosa. En funktionell stilanalys med kvantitativ metod [Non-fiction: A functional style analysis with quantitative methods] (Skrifter utgivna av Svensklärarförenigen 156). Lund: LiberLäromedel.
Wöllstein-Leisten, Angelika, Heilmann, Axel, Stepan, Peter & Vikner, Sten. 1997. Deutsche Satzstruktur. Grundlagen der syntaktischen Analyse [German sentence structure: Foundations for syntactic analysis]. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.


Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Flexibility of frequent clause openers in talk-in-interaction: Det ‘it, that’ and ‘then’ in the prefield in Danish

  • Rasmus Puggaard (a1)


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.