Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T17:47:12.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Apparent Naturalness in Faroese Phonology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Staffan Hellberg
Affiliation:
Institutionen för nordiska språk, Viktor Rydbergsgatan 24, S-412 53Göteborg, Sweden
Get access

Abstract

During the last decade, generative linguists have tried various ways of building phonetic naturalness into the phonological evaluation measure. The phonological component being a mental reality, it is, however, not reasonable to give reference to physical phonetic properties such a prominent place. A return to more formal principles, such as the economy criterion originally suggested by Chomsky and Halle, might be better. Many morphophonemic alternations are not synchronically natural (in the phonetic sense) at all, but only seem so because they have preserved traits from their historically phonetic origin. This is demonstrated here for two seemingly natural rules in Faroese, Velar Softening and Hiatus Insertion. In all Faroese dialects, morphological simplification has burdened the rules with exceptions, but the rules have nowhere spread to new forms so as to become exceptionless again, as would be expected from a phonetically natural rule. In closing, the role of perceptional ease as a factor in language change is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, , Stephen, R. 1974: The Organization of Phonology. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
deChene, , Brent, , and Anderson, , Stephen, R. 1979: Compensatory Lengthening. Language 55, 505535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, , Noam, , and Halle, , Morris, 1968: The Sound Pattern of English. Harper & Row, New York etc.Google Scholar
Hagström, , Björn, 1967: Ändelsevokalerna i fÄröiskan. En fonetisk-fonologisk studie. Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Hellberg, , Stafan, 1978: Unnatural Phonology. Journal of Linguistics 14, 157177.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, , Paul, 1976: Abstractness, Opacity, and Global Rules. In Koutsoudas, , Andreas, (ed.): The Application and Ordering of Grammatical Rules. Mouton, The Hague, pp. 160186.Google Scholar
Lockwood, W. B. 1955: An Introduction to Modern Faroese. Munksgaard, København. 2. Printing 1964.Google Scholar
Rischel, , Jørgen, 1961: Om retskrivningen og udtalen i moderne færøsk. In Jacobsen, , Chr, M. A. og Matras: Føroysk-donsk oràabók/Færøsk-dansk ordbog. 2 útg. Føroya Fróàskaparfelag, Tórshavn, pp. XIII–XXXVI.Google Scholar
Rischel, , Jørgen, 1972: Consonant Reduction in Faroese Noncompound Wordforms. In Evelyn, S. Firchow et al. (eds.): Studies for Einar Haugen Presented by friends and colleagues. Mouton, The Hague, pp. 482497.Google Scholar
Werner, , Otmar, 1964: Zu den schwachtonigen Endungsvokalen im Färingischen. Arkiv för notdisk filologi 79, 247255.Google Scholar
Werner, , Otmar, 1975: Flexion und Morphophonemik im Färöischen. In Karl-Hampus, Dahlstedt (ed.): The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics 2. Almqvist & Wiksell International, Stockholm, pp. 774792.Google Scholar
Zachariasen, , Ulf, 1966. Skiftià millum framgóma-og afturgómaframburà av g og k í forljóài í føroyskum. Fróàskaparrit 15, 7490.Google Scholar
Zachariasen, , Ulf, 1976: Iagttagelser vedrørende hiatusudviklingen i færøsk. In Lars, Svensson et al. (eds.): Nordiska studier i filologi och lingvistik. Festskrift tillägnad Gösta Holm på 60- årsdagen den 8 juli 1976. Studentlitteratur, Lund, pp. 471475.Google Scholar