Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T19:25:49.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Segmental and Superasegmental Status of Preaspiration in Modern Icelandic*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Kristján Árnason
Affiliation:
Háskóli Islands, Málvísindastofnun. Árnagarδi viδ Suδurgötu 101 Reykjavik, Iceland
Get access

Abstract

The paper discusses the historical origin, present day distribution and prosodic status of preaspiration in Icelandic. Having developed as a movement of the openness of the glottis, originally a feature of “hard” stops, towards the nucleus of the stressed syllable, its distribution must be accounted for by a “segmental” rule operating on historical (underlying) hard stops. Its status with respect to length and stress is, however, shown to be that of a prosody of the nucleus of the Modern Icelandic syllable, since it carries length when the syllable is stressed. The development of preaspiration is seen as a part of a more general rule also responsible for voiceless sonorants and fricatives in the nucleus.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, W. S. 1973. Accent and Rhythm. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, S. R. 1982. Differences in Rule Type and their Structural Basis. Harry, van der Hulst and Norval, Smith (eds.) 1982: The Structure of Phonological Representations (Part II). Dordrecht: Foris Publications, pp. 125.Google Scholar
árnason, K. 1977. Preaspiration in Modern Icelandic: Phonetics and Phonology. Sjötíu ritgerδˇir helgaδˇar Jakobi Benediktssyni. Reykjavik: Stofnum árna Magnússonar, pp. 495504.Google Scholar
árnason, K. 1980. Quantity in Historical Phonology: Icelandic and Related Cases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
árnason, K. 1984. Toward a Model of Modern Icelandic Syllable Types. Islensktmál 6: 136–53.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. & Keyser, S. J. 1983. CV-Phonology: A Generative Theory of the Syllable. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Einarsson, S. 1927. Beitrträge zur Phonetik der isländischen Sprache. Oslo: A. W. Br/ggers Boktrykkeri A/S.Google Scholar
Ewen, C. 1982. The Internal Structure of Complex Segments. Harry, van der Hulst and Norval, Smith (eds.) 1982: The Structure of Phonological Representations (Part II). Dordrecht: Foris Publications, pp. 2767.Google Scholar
Guδˇfinnsson, B. 1964. Um íslenzkan framburδˇ. Mállýzkur II. Reykjavik: Bókaútgáfa Menningarsjóδˇs.Google Scholar
Gussmann, E. 1985. The Morphology of a Phonological Rule: Icelandic Vowel Lenght. Edmund, Gussmann (ed.) 1985: Phono-Morphology: Studies in the Interaction of Phonology and Morphology. Lubin: Redakcja Wydawnictw Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubleskiego.Google Scholar
Haugen, E. 1958. The Phonemics of Modern Icelandic. Language 34, 5588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, I. 1972. A Directional Theory of Rule Application in Phonology. Doctoral dissertation, M.I.T. (Published as: University of Hawaii Working Papers in Linguistics. IV. 7.).Google Scholar
Jónsson, B. 1982. Um tvenns konar it-tramburδˇ. Islenskt mál 4, 87115.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. 1982. From Cyclic Phonology to Lexical Phonology. Harry, van der Hulst and Norval, Smith (eds.) 1982: The Structure of Phonological Representations (Part I). Dordrecht: Foris Publications, pp. 131–75.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. 1984. On the lexical phonology of Icelandic. Claes-Christian, Elert, Iréne, Johansson and Eva, Strangert (eds.) 1984: Nordic Prosody III. Papers from a symposium. Acta Universitatis Umensis, Umeå Studies in the Humanities 59. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International, pp. 135–64.Google Scholar
Leben, W. 1982. Metrical or Autosegmental. In van der Hulst, H. & Smith, N. (eds.) 1982: The Structure of Phonological Representations (Part I). Dordrecht: Foris Publications, pp. 177–90.Google Scholar
Liberman, A. 1982. Germanic Accentology I. The Scandinavian languages. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Löfkqvist, A. & Yoshioka, H., 1981. Laryngeal Activity in Icelandic Obstruent Production. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 4, 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murrey, R. W. & Vennemann, T. 1983. Sound Change and Syllable Structure: Problems in Germanic Phonology. Language 59, 514–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oresnik, J. Ms. Modern Icelandic vowel quantity revisited. University of Ljubljana.Google Scholar
ófeigsson, J. 19201924. Træk of moderne islandsk Lydlære. In Sigfús, Blöndal (ed.) 19201924: Islensk-dönsk orδˇ. Reykjavik: Prentsmiδˇjan Gutenberg, pp. XIV–XXVII.Google Scholar
Pétursson, M. 1978. Drög aδˇ hljóδˇkerfistrœδˇi. Reykjavik: Iδˇunn.Google Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, E. 1984. Islensk málfrœδˇi: Hljóδˇkerfisfrœδˇi og beyginarfrœδˇi. Reykjavik: University of Iceland.Google Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, E. Ms. Hvaδˇ og hvar er aδˇblástur? Reykjavik: University of Iceland.Google Scholar
Svavarsdóttir, A. 1984. Samfellt eδˇa ekki samfeilt? Urn vensl hljómenda i islensku og βáttagildi /1/. Islenskt mált 6, 732.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, H. 1978. The Phonology of Icelandic Preaspiration. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 1, 354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thráinsson, H. 1980. Sonorant Devoicing at Lake Mývatn. Even, Hovdhaugen (ed.) 1980: The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics [4]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, pp. 355–64.Google Scholar
Vennemann, T. 1972. On the Theory of Syllabic Phonology. Linguistische Berichte 18, 118.Google Scholar