Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T19:37:13.749Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lars Hellan: Anaphora in Norwegian and the Theory of Grammar. Studies in Generative Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris Publications, 1988.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Martin Everaert
Martin Everaert
Affiliation:
Rijksuniversitiet te Utrecht, Onderzoeksinstituut voor Taal en Spraak, NL-3512 JK Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , June 1991 , pp. 65 - 79
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, S. 1986. The Typology of Anaphoric Dependencies: Icelandic (and Other) Reflexives. In Hellan, L. & Christensen, K. K. (eds.). Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 65–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, A. 1979. Traces and the Intervention Constraint. Linguistic Inquiry 10, 503–505.Google Scholar
Anward, J. 1974. Swedish Reflexivization. In Dahl, Ö. (ed.), Papers from the First Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, 7–37.Google Scholar
Battistella, E. 1989. Chinese Reflexivization: A movement to INFL Approach. Linguistics 27, 987–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belletti, A. & Rizzi, L. 1988. Psych Verbs and Theta Theory. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 6, 291–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremen, K. von 1987. Reply to Vikner: Parameters of Binder and of Binding Category in Danish. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 31, 3–8.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1986. Knowledge of Language. Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Everaert, M. 1986. The Syntax of Reflexivization. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, J. 1982. On the Lexical Representation of Romance Reflexive Clitics. In Bresnan, J. (ed.), The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, 87–148.Google Scholar
Hellan, L. 1983. Anaphora in Norwegian and the Theory of Binding. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 5, University of Trondheim.Google Scholar
Hestvik, A. 1989. LF-movement of Pronouns and the Computation of Binding Domains. Doctoral dissertation, Brandeis University.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, E. 1988. Psych-verbs, Unaccusativity and the Binding Theory. Ms. University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R.Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. 1984. Some Notes on Subjunctive Clauses and Binding in Icelandic. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 6, 102–137.Google Scholar
Koster, J. 1985. Reflexives in Dutch. In Guéron, J., Obenauer, H.-G. & Pollock, J.-Y (eds.), Grammatical Representation. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Koster, J. 1987. Domains and Dynasties: The Radical Autonomy of Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maling, J. 1984. Non-Clause Bounded Reflexives in Icelandic. Linguistics and Philosophy 7, 211–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, R. 1977. The Grammar of Quantification. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Pica, P. 1987. On the Nature of the Reflexivization Cycle. Proceedings of NELS 17, 483–500.Google Scholar
Reinhart, T. & Reuland, E. (to appear). Anaphors and Logophors: An Argument Structure Perspective. In Koster, J. & Reuland, E. (eds.), Long Distance Anaphora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Riemsdijk, H. van & Williams, E. 1981. NP-structure. The Linguistic Review 1, 171–217.Google Scholar
Roeper, T. & Keyser, J. 1989. RE: The Abstract Clitic Hypothesis.Ms. University of Massachusetts at Amherst/MIT.Google Scholar
Sproat, R. 1985. On Deriving the Lexicon. Doctoral dissertation. MIT.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, H. 1986. Icelandic Reflexives Ten Years Later. Talk given at the 3rd Workshop on Comparative Germanic Syntax, Turku/Åbo.Google Scholar
Vikner, S. 1986. Parameters of Binder and Binding Category in Danish. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 23. University of Trondheim.Google Scholar
Williams, E. 1986. A Reassignment of the Functions of LF. Linguistic Inquiry 17, 265–300.Google Scholar
Zubizaretta, M. L. 1987. Levels of Representation in the Lexicon and in the Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar