Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T04:01:09.829Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Organizational Change: Case Studies and Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2020

Thomas J. Pavlak  and
Molly Wong
Thomas J. Pavlak
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Molly Wong
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One continuing source of frustration in public policy and mangement education is the relative paucity of materials in empirical inquiry. Typically, instructors must borrow and adapt instructional materials originally developed for use in other fields (e.g., Political Science, Sociology). While many of these texts, laboratory manuals and other instructional resources are of excellent quality, they often are only marginally related to public policy and management concerns. Learning for skillbuilding in empirical inquiry is not content-free, however, and students frequently have difficulty applying concepts and techniques covered in these instructional materials to their own field of study—the linkages may not be readily apparent.

The problem is particularly acute when one is trying to provide students with relevant "hands on" experience in applying various analytic methods to actual data for public policy and management decision-making.

Type
Research Article
Information
News for Teachers of Political Science , Volume 41 , Spring 1984 , pp. 1 - 6
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alderfer, Clayton P. and Berg, David N.. Organization development: The profession and the practitioner, in the Mirvis, Philip H. and Berg, David N. (Ed.). Failures in Organization Development and Change: Cases and Essays for Learning. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1977, pp. 89–110.Google Scholar
Champion, Dean J.The Sociology of Organizations. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1975.Google Scholar
Clark, P.Action Research and Organization Change. New York: Harper and Row, 1972.Google Scholar
Dunn, William N. The two communities metaphor and models of knowledge use. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 1980, 1 (4), 515–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, Wendell L. and Bell, Cecil H. Jr., Organization Development: Behavioral Science Interventions for Organization Improvement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall, 1973.Google Scholar
Glass, Gene V.McGaw, Barry and Smith, MaryLee. Meta-Analysis in Social Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1981.Google Scholar
Hunter, John E.Schmidt, Frank L. and Jackson, Gregg B.. Meta-Analysis: Cumulating Research Findings Across Studies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1982.Google Scholar
Huse, Edgar F. and Beer, Michael. Eclectic approach to organizational development. Harvard Business Review, September-October 1971, 49(5). 103–112.Google Scholar
Lucas, W.A.The Case Survey Method: Aggregating Case Experience. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation 1974.Google Scholar
Yin, Robert K. The case study as a serious research strategy. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 1981, 3(1), 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, Robert K. and Heald, Karen A.. Using the case survey method to analyze policy studies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1975, 20(3), 371–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar