Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-11T08:12:50.590Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘There's Our Catastrophe’: Empathy, Sacrifice, and the Stageing of Suffering in Beckett's Theatre

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2009

Michael David Fox
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In his seminal The Theatre of the Absurd, Martin Esslin suggested that Samuel Beckett, in denying his characters individualized facets of humanity, achieved an ‘alienation effect’ that was more profound and assured than Brecht's. Here, Michael David Fox, while agreeing that Beckett denies actors and audiences the kinds of identification achieved in naturalistic drama through Stanislavskian techniques, argues that he demands a different quality of empathy from his audiences – not through the artifice of a character's simulated pain but through the actuality of the performer's physical suffering. While analyzing the demands and constraints upon actors which Beckett imposes in his better-known plays, he also re-evaluates the more ‘occasional’ piece Catastrophe – written in 1982 ostensibly as a homage to the then-imprisoned Czech playwright Vaclav Havel – less as a critique of political terror than as an ironic and devastating self-critique of the terror of Beckett's own tragic representation. Michael David Fox is a doctoral student in drama and critical theory in the Joint Doctoral Program in Drama at the University of California, Irvine and the University of California, San Diego. His dissertation is on the production of empathy in Shakespeare's tragedies. He wishes to thank Robert Weimann, Wolfgang Iser, and Gabriele Schwab for their helpful and generous comments on earlier drafts of this essay.

Type
Research Article
Information
New Theatre Quarterly , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , November 2001 , pp. 357 - 372
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes and References

1. Lyotard, Jean-François, The Postmodern Condition: a Report on Knowledge, trans. Bennington, G., Massumi, B. (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984), p. xxivGoogle Scholar.

2. Fredric Jameson, ‘Postmodernism, or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism’, p. 69.

3. Beckett, Samuel, ‘Play’, in Collected Shorter Plays (New York: Grove Press, 1984), p. 157Google Scholar.

4. Butler, Judith, Excitable Speech: a Politics of the Performative (New York: Routledge, 1997), p. 10Google Scholar, quoting Felman, Shoshana, The Literary Speech Act: Don Juan with J. L. Auston, or Seduction in Two Languages, trans. Porter, Catherine (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1983), p. 94Google Scholar.

5. Bourdieu, Pierre, The Logic of Practice, trans. Nice, Richard (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1990), p. 73Google Scholar.

6. ‘By “empathy” I mean “a capacity or disposition to know, to feel, and to respond congruently to what another is feeling, and the process of doing so”’. See Plantinga, Carl, ‘The Scene of Empathy and the Human Face on Film’, in Passionate Views: Film, Cognition, and Emotion, ed. Plantiga, Carl, Smith, Greg M. (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999), p. 245Google Scholar.

7. Esslin, Martin, The Theatre of the Absurd (New York: Pelican, 1968), p. 300Google Scholar. See alsoEsslin, Martin, ‘Godot, the Authorized Version’, journal of Beckett Studies, I (Winter 1976), p. 99Google Scholar, where Esslin repeats his view that Beckett achieves ‘a genuine Verfremdungseffekt’.

8. Ibid.

9. Beckett, Samuel, Endgame (New York: Grove Press, 1958), p. 2Google Scholar.

10. Ibid., p. 301.

11. Derrida, Jacques, OfGrammatology, trans. Spivak, Gaytari Chekravorty (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976), p. 65Google Scholar.

12. Diderot, Denis, ‘Conversations on the Natural Son’, in Selected Writings on Art and Literature, trans. Bremmer, G. (London: Penguin Books, 1994)Google Scholar.

13. Szondi, Peter, Theory of the Modern Drama, trans. Hays, Michael (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987), p. 8Google Scholar.

14. Ibid.

15. Torporkov, Vasily Osipovish, Stanislavski in Rehearsal: the Final Years, trans. Edwards, C. (New York: Theatre Arts Books, 1979), p. 101Google Scholar.

16. Ibid., p. 14.

17. Cohen, Robert, Theatre (Mountain View, California: Mayfield, 1997), p. 24Google Scholar (Cohen's emphasis).

18. Wilshire, Bruce, Role Playing and Identity: the Limits of Theatre as Metaphor (Bloomington; Indianapolis: University of Indiana Press, 1982), p. 27–8 (emphasis added)Google Scholar.

19. In film, the media through which most people now experience acting, the disappearance of the actor in the persona of the character is taken for granted. As film theorist Christian Metz has observed, the spectator of a realist film engages in a leap ‘from an objectively real but denied signifier to an imaginary but psychologically real signified’ as the fiction of the signified role cancels the spectator's perception of the signifying actor. See Metz, Christian, The Imaginary Signifer: Psychoanalysis and the Cinema, trans. Britton, Celia, Williams, Annwyl, Brewster, Ben, Guzzetti, Alfred (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1982), p. 116CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20. Brecht, Bertolt, ‘Notes on Stanislavsky’, Tulane Drama Review, IX, No. 2 (Winter 1964), p. 155CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21. Brecht, Bertolt, Brecht on Theatre, ed. Willett, John (New York: Hill and Wang, 1964), p. 37–8Google Scholar.

22. Carlson, Marvin, Theories of the Theatre: a Historical and Critical Survey from the Greeks to the Present (Ithaca; London: Cornell University Press, 1994), p. 385Google Scholar.

23. Kellner, Douglas, ‘Brecht's Marxist Aesthetic: the Korch Connection’, in Bertolt Brecht: Political Theory and Literary Practice, ed. Weber, Betty Nancy, Heinin, Hubert (Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1980), p. 32Google Scholar.

24. Beckett, The Unnamable, p. 298.

25. Weimann, Robert, ‘Representation and Performance: the Uses of Authority in Shakespeare's Theatre’, PMLA, CI, No. 3 (05 1992), p. 499Google Scholar.

26. Iser, Wolfgang, The Act of Reading (Baltimore; London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978), p. 169Google Scholar.

27. Weimann, ‘Representation and Performance’, p. 499.

28. Iser, Wolfgang, ‘The Art of Failure: the Stifled Laugh in Beckett's Theatre’, in Prospecting: from Reader Response to Literary Anthropology (Baltimore; London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993), p. 190Google Scholar.

29. Chaikin, Joseph, The Presence of the Actor: Notes on the Open Theater, Disguises, Acting, and Repression (New York: Athenaeum, 1972), p. 138Google Scholar.

30. Brecht, Brecht on Theatre, p. 138.

31. Esslin, Martin, Meditations: Essays on Brecht, Beckett, and the Media (New York: Grove Press, 1982), p. 123 (Esslin's emphasis)Google Scholar.

32. Beckett, Samuel, Watt (London: Calder, 1953), p. 75–6 (emphasis added)Google Scholar.

33. Kalb, Jonathan, Beckett in Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), p. 235CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

34. Ibid., p. 234.

35. Chaikin, The Presence of the Actor, p. 138 (emphasis added).

36. Knowlson, James, Damned to Fame: the Life of Samuel Beckett (London: Bloomsbury, 1996), p. 502Google Scholar.

37. Ibid.

38. Ibid.

39. Kalb, Beckett in Performance, p. 198.

40. Ibid.

41. Ibid., p. 199.

42. Ibid., p. 198–9.

43. Ibid., p. 181.

44. Ibid.

45. Ibid., p. 202.

46. Harmon, Maurice, ed., No Author Better Served: the Correspondence of Samuel Beckett and Alan Schneider (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998), p. 2–5Google Scholar.

47. Ibid.

48. Ibid., p. 11.

49. Beckett, The Unnamable, p. 418.

50. Abbot, H. Porter, ‘Tyranny and Theatricality: the Example of Samuel Beckett’, Theatre Journal, XL, No. 1 (1988), p. 82Google Scholar.

51. Ibid.

52. Chaikin, The Presence of the Actor, p. 145.

53. Beckett, Endgame, p. 1.

54. Ibid.

55. Beckett, Samuel, Happy Days (New York: Grove Press, 1961), p. 7Google Scholar.

56. Beckett, ‘Play’, in Collected Shorter Plays, p. 1.

57. Samuel Beckett, ‘Krapp's Last Tape’, in Collected Shorter Plays, p. 55.

58. Samuel Beckett, ‘Quad’, in Collected Shorter Plays, p. 291, 293.

59. Knowlson, Damned to Fame, p. 516.

60. Kalb, Beckett in Performance, p. 203.

61. Beckett, ‘Molloy’, in Molloy, Malone Dies, The Unnamable, p. 157.

62. Schwab, Gabriele, Subjects without Selves: Transitional Texts in Modern Fiction (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1994), p. 140Google Scholar.

63. Beckett, Samuel, ‘The Lost Ones’, in The Complete Short Prose, 1929–1989, ed. Gontarski, S. E. (New York: Grove Press, 1995), p. 219Google Scholar.

64. Kalb, Beckett in Performance, p. 147.

65. Ibid., p. 234.

66. Ibid., p. 235.

67. Blumenthal, Eileen, Joseph Chaikin: Exploring at the Boundaries of Theatre (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984), p. 188Google Scholar.

68. Kalb, Beckett in Performance, p. 59.

69. Samuel Beckett, ‘Film’, in Collected Shorter Plays, p. 163, 165.

70. Beckett, ‘Play’, in Collected Shorter Plays, p. 147.

71. Ibid., p. 157.

72. Ibid.

73. Beckett, Happy Days, p. 7.

74. Beckett, ‘Molloy’, in Molloy, Malone Dies, The Unnamable, p. 88.

75. Beckett, ‘Play’, in Collected Shorter Plays, p. 154.

76. Ibid., p. 157.

77. Beckett, Happy Days, p. 20–1, 25–9.

78. Beckett, Waiting for Godot, p. 49.

79. Kalb, Beckett in Performance, p. 146.

80. Ibid.

81. Barnes, Ben, ‘Aspects of Directing Beckett’, Irish University Revieiv, XIV, No. 1 (1984), p. 86Google Scholar.

82. Beckett, Samuel, The Unnamable (New York: Grove Press, 1958), p. 94Google Scholar.

83. Beckett, ‘Molloy’, in Molloy, Malone Dies, The Unnamable, p. 39.

84. Iser, Wolfgang, The Implied Reader: Patterns of Communication in Prose Fiction from Bunyan to Beckett (Baltimore; London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1974), p. 164, 264Google Scholar.

85. Beckett, Endgame, p. 1, 50.

86. Chaikin, The Presence of the Actor, p. 138 (emphasis added).

87. Iser, ‘The Art of Failure’, p. 158.

88. Kalb, Beckett in Performance, p. 146.

89. Samuel Beckett, ‘Catastrophe’, in Collected Shorter Plays, p. 300.

90. Bollas, Christopher, Cracking Up: the Work of Un-conscious Experience (London: Routledge, 1995), p. 10–11Google Scholar, 14–16. See also Bollas, Christopher, The Shadow of the Object: Psychoanalysis and the Unthought Known (New York: Columbia University Press, 1987), p. 16–17Google Scholar; Forces of Destiny: Psychoanalysis and the Human Idiom (London: Free Association Books, 1989), p. 213–14.

91. Bollas, Cracking Up, p. 11.

92. Ibid., p. 15.

93. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, Phenomenology of Perception, trans. Smith, Colin (London: Routledge, 1989), p. 349Google Scholar.

94. Freud, Sigmund, Totem and Taboo: Some Points of Agreement Between the Mental Lives of Savages and Neurotics, trans. Strachey, James (New York: Norton, 1950), p. 192–4Google Scholar.

95. Girard, Rene, Violence and the Sacred, trans. Gregory, Patrick (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1977), p. 68–88Google Scholar, 290–7.

96. Vernant, Jean-Pierre and Vidal-Naquet, Pierre, Myth and Tragedy in Ancient Greece, trans. Lloyd, Janet (New York: Zone Books, 1990)Google Scholar.

97. Girard, Violence and the Sacred, p. 291.

98. Artaud, Antonin, The Theatre and Its Double, trans. Richards, Mary Caroline (New York: Grove Press, 1958)Google Scholar.

99. Grotowski, Jerzy, Tozvards a Poor Theatre (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1968)Google Scholar.

100. Kalb, Beckett in Performance, p. 249.

101. Beckett, ‘Catastrophe’, in Collected Shorter Plays, p. 295–301.

102. Ibid., p. 300–1.

103. Kubiak, Anthony, Stages of Terror: Terrorism, Ideology, and Coercion as Theatre History (Bloomington; Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1991), p. 134Google Scholar.

104. Kalb, Beckett in Performance, p. 146.

105. Artaud, The Theatre and Its Double, p. 13.