Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T13:15:08.585Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Peter Brook and the ‘Two Worlds’ of Theatre

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2009

Paul B. Cohen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The ‘two worlds’ of Peter Brook's theatre are its audience and its actors. According to Brook, the actors bring their ‘world of the imagination’ to meet with the audience's ‘world of the everyday’: but instead of the temporary suspension of belief in the ‘everyday world’ which a western audience has traditionally forced upon itself, Brook conceives the true theatrical experience as an interaction between the two modes of reality – those of the ‘imagination’ and the mundane. In the following article, Paul Cohen assesses the importance of this basic philosophy to Brook's productions since 1968, paying particular attention to the tour of Africa with The Conference of the Birds and the recent epic production of The Mahabharata, attempting to show that Brook's theory still directly informs the methodology and the performance orientation of his productions. Paul Cohen originally presented this paper as an MA dissertation for Vanderbilt University, and is currently on the Professional Writing Program of the University of Southern California in Los Angeles.

Type
Research Article
Information
New Theatre Quarterly , Volume 7 , Issue 26 , May 1991 , pp. 147 - 159
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Attar, Farid Ud-din, adapted by Carrière, Jean-Claude and Brook, Peter. The Conference of the Birds. Connecticut: Dramatic Publishing Company, 1982.Google Scholar
Auslander, Philip. ‘Holy Theatre and Catharsis’, Theatre Research International, XIX (1984), p. 16–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bablet, Denis. ‘Rencontre avec Peter Brook’, Travail Théâtral, X (Winter 1973), p. 3–38.Google Scholar
Banu, Georges, et al. Les Voies de la création théâtrale, XII: Brook. Paris: Editions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 1985.Google Scholar
Banu, Georges. ‘Le Mahabharata’, Alternatives Théâtrales, No. 24 (07 1985).Google Scholar
Bernard, Kenneth. ‘Some Observations on the Theater of Peter Brook’, Theater, Fall–Winter 1980, p. 72–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, Ralph. On Directing Shakespeare: Interviews with Contemporary Directors. London: Croom Helm, 1977.Google Scholar
Billington, Michael. ‘Written on the Wind: the Dramatic Art of Peter Brook’, The Listener, 21 and 28 12 1981, p. 21–8.Google Scholar
Brook, Peter. The Empty Space. New York: Atheneum, 1969.Google Scholar
Brook, Peter. ‘Leaning on the Moment: a Conversation with Peter Brook’, Parabola, No. 4 (05 1979), p. 46–59.Google Scholar
Brook, Peter. ‘Lie and Glorious Adjective: an Interview with Peter Brook’, Parabola, No. 6 (08. 1981), p. 60–73.Google Scholar
Brook, Peter. ‘Mahabharata Now’, The Village Voice, 1 12 1987, p. 130–1.Google Scholar
Brook, Peter. The Shifting Point: Forty Years of Theatrical Exploration 1946–1987. London: Methuen, 1988.Google Scholar
Brustein, Robert. ‘The Quest of Peter Brook’, New Republic, 28 06 1980, p. 27–9.Google Scholar
Brustein, Robert. ‘On Theatre: Shakespeare Our Contemporary’, New Republic, 22 and 29 08 1981, p. 23–5.Google Scholar
Chekhov, Anton, French version by Brook, Peter, Carrière, Jean-Claude, and Lavona, Lusia. La Cerisaie. Paris: CICT, 1981.Google Scholar
Cook, Judith. Director's Theatre, London: Harrap, 1974.Google Scholar
Coveney, Michael. ‘Ubu’, Plays and Players, XXV (05 1978), p. 28.Google Scholar
Croyden, Margaret. The Centre: a Narrative. Paris: CICT, 1980.Google Scholar
Croyden, Margaret. Lunatics, Lovers, and Poets: the Contemporary Experimental Theatre. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1974.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, Gautam. ‘The Mahabharata: Peter Brook's Orientalism’, Performing Arts Journal, X (1987), p. 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsner, John. ‘The Poetic History of Mankind: Peter Brook's Production of The Mahabharata in Glasgow’, Month, No. 21 (06 1988), p. 725–7.Google Scholar
Evans, James-Roose. Experimental Theatre from Stanislavsky to Peter Brook. New York: Universe Books, 1983.Google Scholar
Gibson, Michael. ‘Brook's Africa’, The Drama Review, XVII (09 1973), p. 37–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grotowski, jerzy. Towards a Poor Theatre. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1968.Google Scholar
Gussow, Mel. ‘La Mama: Three Evenings by Peter Brook’, New York Times, 6 05 1980, Sec. C, p. 6.Google Scholar
Gussow, Mel. ‘Peter Brook Returns to Chekhov's Vision’, New York Times, 9 08. 1981, Sec. D, p. 2.Google Scholar
Harris, Laurilyn J. ‘Peter Brook's King Lear: Aesthetic Achievement or Far Side of the Moon?’, Theatre Research International, XI (1986), p. 223–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayman, Ronald. ‘Rebel in a Theatrical Cause’, The Independent, 7 04 1988, p. 19.Google Scholar
Hayman, Ronald. Theatre and Anti-Theatre. London: Seeker and Warburg, 1979.Google Scholar
Heilpern, John. Conference of the Birds: the Story of Peter Brook in Africa. London: Faber and Faber, 1977.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Moira. ‘The Mahabharata’, The Nation, 16 01 1988, p. 66.Google Scholar
Hunt, Albert. ‘Acting and Being’, New Society, 20 02 1975, p. 460–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, Albert. ‘The Trials of Working with a Master Magician’, New Society, 26 08 1982, p. 349–50.Google Scholar
Hunt, Albert. ‘Brook's Poem of the World’, New Society, 15 04 1988, p. 20–1.Google Scholar
Hurren, Kenneth. ‘Quarter’, Drama, No. 106 (Autumn 1972), p. 72–4.Google Scholar
Innes, Christopher. Holy Theatre: Ritual and the Avant Garde. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Jones, David Richard. Great Directors at Work: Stanislavsky, Brecht, Kazan, Brook. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Edward Trostle. Following Directions: a Study of Peter Brook. New York: Peter Lang, 1985.Google Scholar
Kott, Jan. Shakespeare Our Contemporary. London: Methuen, 1978.Google Scholar
Kott, Jan. ‘The Theatre of Essence: Kantor and Brook’, Theater, XIV (Summer–Fall 1983), p. 55–8.Google Scholar
Kozintsev, Grigori. King Lear: the Space of Tragedy. London: Heinemann, 1978.Google Scholar
Kramer, Jane. ‘Letter from Europe’, New Yorker, 1 03 1982, p. 121–7.Google Scholar
Kroll, Jack. ‘Peter Brook's Volcanoes’, Newsweek, 19 05 1980, p. 101–2.Google Scholar
Labeille, Daniel. ‘The Formless Hunch: an Interview with Peter Brook’, Modern Drama, XXIII (09 1980), p. 220–6.Google Scholar
Lahr, John. ‘Knowing What to Celebrate’, Plays and Players, XXIII (03 1986), p. 17–19.Google Scholar
Marowitz, Charles. ‘From Prodigy to Professional as Written, Directed, and Acted by Peter Brook’, New York Times Magazine, 24 10 1978, p. 62–3, 92–118.Google Scholar
Popkin, Henry. ‘Theatre’, The Nation, 6 09 1975, p. 189–190.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, Michael. ‘Radical Magician’, Observer Magazine, 11 05 1986, p. 32–3, 35.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, Michael. ‘Transports of Delight’, The Observer, 24 04 1988, p. 39.Google Scholar
Read, Bill. ‘Peter Brook: from Stratford-upon-Avon to the Gare du Nord’, Boston University Journal, XXIV (1975), p. 64–70.Google Scholar
Richie, Donald. ‘A Midsummer Night's Dream’, The Drama Review, XV (Spring 1971), p. 330–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schechner, Richard. ‘The Mahabharata: Talking with Peter Brook’, The Drama Review, XXX (Spring 1986), p. 54–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selbourne, David. The Making of A Midsummer Night's Dream. London: Methuen, 1983.Google Scholar
Shorter, Eric. ‘Timon of Athens’, Drama, No. 115 (Winter 1974), p. 21–7.Google Scholar
Shorter, Eric. ‘Off the Cuff with Peter Brook and Company’, Drama, No. 129 (Summer 1978), p. 29–33.Google Scholar
Shorter, Eric. ‘Short and Long Measures in Paris’, Drama, No. 132 (Spring 1979), p. 18–26.Google Scholar
Shorter, Eric. ‘Brook and Others in Avignon’, Drama, No. 134 (Autumn 1979), p. 33–40.Google Scholar
Shorter, Eric. ‘Chekhov through English Eyes in French’, Drama, No. 141 (1981), p. 6–8.Google Scholar
Smith, A. C. H.Orghast at Persepolis. London: Eyre Methuen, 1972.Google Scholar
Tonkin, Boyd, and Claire, Colvin. ‘Maha Marathon’, Drama, No. 159 (1986), p. 21–3.Google Scholar
Tonkin, Boyd. ‘The Reluctant Hero Comes Home’, New Statesman, 22 04 1988, p. 22–4.Google Scholar
Trewin, J. C.Peter Brook: a Biography. London: Macdonald. 1971.Google Scholar
Warren, Roger. ‘Shakespeare at Stratford and the National Theatre, 1979’, Shakespeare Survey, XXXIII (1980), p. 177–8.Google Scholar
Williams, David. Peter Brook: a Theatrical Casebook. London: Methuen, 1988.Google Scholar