No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
A Hyphenated Field: Community-Based Theatre in the USA
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 January 2009
Abstract
Jan Cohen-Cruz argues that in the hyphen separating community theatre from community-based theatre lies a world of difference – of intention as of realization. Where community theatre tends to assemble the more self-confident members of a majority group to emulate successes from the Broadway repertoire, community-based theatre prefers to draw upon minority and deprived groups in an attempt to create original modes of performance that help the participants make sense of and improve their society. Drawing upon her own experiences and those of other community-based theatre practitioners over a period extending back to the heady days of the 'sixties, Jan Cohen-Cruz identifies weaknesses and failures as well as strengths – as also the ambiguous area where the success of the product may carry dangers of compromise or unhappy collaboration. Associate Professor of Drama Jan Cohen-Cruz co-edited Playing Boal: Theatre, Therapy, Activism, and edited Radical Street Performance: an International Anthology. Her articles have appeared in TDR, High Performance, American Theatre, Urban Resources, Women and Performance, The Mime Journal, African Theatre, and the anthology But Is It Art? From 1995 to 1997 Cohen-Cruz co-directed NYU Tisch School of the Arts AmeriCorps project – President Clinton's domestic Peace Corps – focusing on violence reduction through the arts. She has since co-directed Urban Ensemble, through which Tisch School of the Arts students undertake community-based art internships.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000
References
Notes and References
1. Rukeyser, Muriel, The Life of Poetry (New York: Morrow, 1974), p. 23–4Google Scholar.
2. de Nobriga, Kathy, High Performance, 12 1993Google Scholar.
3. Heritage, Paul, unpublished lecture to drama students, New York University, 04 2000Google Scholar.
4. Boal, Augusto, Theatre of the Oppressed, trans. Charles, A. and McBride, Maria-Odilia Leal (New York: Urizen, 1979), p. 155Google Scholar.
5. Malpede, John, conversation with the author, New York City, Spring 1995Google Scholar.
6. Cocke, Dudley, Newman, Harry, and Salmons-Rue, Janet, ed., From the Ground Up (Ithaca: Cornell University, 1993), p. 13Google Scholar.
7. American Heritage Dictionary (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1978), p. 1076.
8. Cohen, Anthony P., The Symbolic Construction of Community (New York: Youngstock, 1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
9. Dudley Cocke, from unpublished interview with Linda Frye Burnham, winter 2000.
10. Linda Frye Burnham and Steven Durland, www.communityarts.net homepage. High Performance lost its funding and ceased publishing in the late 1990s.
11. National Gathering With an Attitude, University of Berkeley campus, May 2000.
12. O'Neal, John, ‘Motion of the Ocean’, The Drama Review, XII, No. 4 (Summer 1968), p. 70CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
13. Susan Perlstein, quoted in William Alexander's unpublished manuscript, 1993.
14. I am grateful to Linda Frye Burnham for this insight as well as general responses to this essay.
15. Quotes come from a conversation on critical writing about community arts, convened by the author at National Gathering with an Attitude.
16. Linda Frye Burnham, ibid.
17. John O'Neal, e-mail to NWA participants, 2 June 2000.
18. Linda Burnham, e-mail to author, 5 June 2000.
19. Lerman, Liz, ‘Toward a Process for Critical Response’, High Performance, Winter 1993, p. 46–9Google Scholar.
20. Roth, Moira, ‘Suzanne Lacy: Social Reformer and Witch’, The Drama Review, XXXII, No. 1 (Spring 1988), p. 45Google Scholar.
21. Linda Burnham, personal correspondence with the author via e-mail, May 2000.
22. Croce, Arlene, ‘Discussing the Undisscussable’, The New Yorker, 26 12 1994–2 01 1995Google Scholar.
23. John O'Neal, participant in a conversation on critical writing, NWA.
24. See Brady, Sara, ‘Welded to the Ladle: Steelbound and Non-Radicality in Community-Based Theatre’, The Drama Review, XLIV, No. 3 (Fall 2000)Google Scholar.