Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T22:41:37.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Revisiting Aquinas on the Passion of Despair

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Christopher Bobier*
Affiliation:
Saint Mary's University of Minnesota, 700 Terrace Heights Winona, MN, USA

Abstract

The passion of despair, according to Thomas Aquinas, is an appetitive movement away from a future arduous good that is impossible to attain. Criticism of his account of despair abounds. Nicholas Lombardo argues that despair cannot be proper passion because the appetite cannot move away from a good. Eric D'Arcy and Susan James argue that Aquinas's description of passions as movements casts doubt on his understanding of some passions, including despair. Michael Miller and John Patrick Reid deny that despair can be morally praiseworthy and conducive to action. In this paper, I defend Aquinas's account of the passion of despair from these criticisms.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works cited

Aristotle. 1984. Physics. In The Complete Works: Revised Oxford Translation, Vol. 2, Ed. Barnes, Jonathan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brungs, Alexander. 2005. “Die passiones animae.” In Speer, Andreas, editor, Thomas Von Aquin: Die Summa Theologiae: 198222.Google Scholar
Butera, Giuseppe, 2006. “On Reason's Control of the Passions in Aquinas's Theory of Temperance.” Medieval Studies 68: 133160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cates, Diana Fritz. 2009. Aquinas on the Emotions: A Religious-Ethical Inquiry. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
D'Arcy, Eric. 1967. Introduction and notes to Summa Theologiae. Vol. 19, The Emotions. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
De Young, Rebecca Konyndyk. 2015. “The Roots of Despair”. Res Philosophica 92: 829854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferry, Leonard. 2011. “Passionalist or Rationalist? The emotions in Aquinas's moral theology.” New Blackfriars 93: 292308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froula, Jeffrey. 2016. “Aquinas on the Moral Neutrality of the Passion of Despair”. New Blackfriars 97: 308324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gondreau, Paul. 2007. “The passions and the moral life: Appreciating the originality of Aquinas.” The Thomist 71 (3):419450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gondreau, Paul. 2002. The Passions of Christ's Soul in the Theology of St. Thomas Aquinas. Munster: Aschendorf Munster.Google Scholar
Jensen, Stephen. 2013. “Virtuous Deliberation and the Passions.” The Thomist 77: 193227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Peter. 1999. “Aquinas on the Passions.” In Aquinas's Moral Theory. MacDonald, Scott and Stump, Eleonore, eds. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Knuuttila, Simo. 2004. Emotions in ancient and medieval philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lombardo, Nicholas E. 2011. The logic of desire: Aquinas on emotion. Washington D.C.: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Manzanedo, Marcos. 1983. “La classificación de les pasiones o emociones.” Studium 23: 357378.Google Scholar
Miller, Michael. 2012. “Aquinas on the Passion of Despair”. New Blackfriars 93: 387396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miner, Robert. 2009. Thomas Aquinas on the Passions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, John Patrick. 1965. Introduction, notes, and appendices to Summa Theologiae. Vol. 21, Fear and Anger. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Thomas, Aquinas. 2001. Corpus Thomisticum. S. Thomae de Aquinas Opera Omnia. Ed. Alarcon, Enrique. Pamplona: Universidad de Navarra. http://www.corpusthomisticum.org.Google Scholar
Uffenheimer-Lippens, Elisabeth. 2003. “Rationalized passion and passionate rationality: Thomas Aquinas on the relation between reason and the passions.” The Review of Metaphysics: 525558.Google Scholar