Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T00:17:54.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Glaucon's Question reconsidered: A reply to Mr. Hugo Meynell

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2024

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reply
Copyright
Copyright © 1973 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Possibly there is an allusion to the notion of the intrinsic goodness of justice in a sentence on p. 79: ‘I admit that there are persons in every society who have a passionate interest in justice, but are without hope for themselves in pursuing it.’ [i.e., are not pursuing it for the sake of any consequences.] But for all that is said here, this ‘passionate interest’ might be like a ‘passionate interest’ in butterflies, merely a personal taste or inclination, a quirk, not a love of what is, above all else, worthwhile in human life.

2 The Heythrop Journal (Oct. 1970), pp. 365‐387, esp. p. 367.

I am very much indebted to this and other papers by Dr. Finnis, as well as to private conversation, for much of the argument of this paper, especially in the following pages.

3 We are not speaking of divine beatitude here, nor of the possibility that any human happiness must be somewhat imperfect in this life.

3 Cf. Gauthier & Jotif, Commentary on N.E., at IV. 3.