Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T18:42:44.523Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Development and Environment: in Dialogue with Liberation Theology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Celia Deane‐Drummond
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is only comparatively recently that there has been an attempt to examine issues in environment and development together, rather than separately. The shift in attitude by the greens came as a result of the realisation that poor nations are forced to destroy their environment in order to survive and by the developers as a result of a new awareness that policies which destroy the very basis for change are invalid. The broad agreement in the notion that both environment and development are interconnected applies regardless of the particular models of development or environment.

Liberation theology identifies with a particular model of development which arose at a time when the global and political implications of environmental issues were largely ignored. It is, therefore, hardly surprising that environmental concerns are rarely, if ever, mentioned in the classical texts. The purpose of this paper is to explore both the challenge of the environment to liberation theology and its possible contribution to an inclusive environmental theology. Some models of development are more likely to be compatible with particular environmental philosophies. What contribution, if any, can liberation theology make to the current debate?

In the post-war era the conventional wisdom of the so-called ‘modernisation’ theory held that in order to achieve development so called ‘underdeveloped’ nations must adopt a profit incentive and find ways and means for economic productivity.

Type
Research Article
Information
New Blackfriars , Volume 78 , Issue 916 , June 1997 , pp. 279 - 289
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 From foreword by Lloyd Timberlake in Dictionary of Environment and Development, Crump, A., ed., London, Earthscan Publications, 1991.Google Scholar

2 For scientific discussion see, for example, Environment, Population and Development, Sarre, P., ed., Keynes, Milton, Open University, 1991.Google Scholar

3 See, Goulet, D., ‘Development Ethics and Ecological Wisdom’, in Ethics of Environment and Development: Global Challenges, International Response, Engel, J.R. and Engel, J. G., eds. London, Belhaven Press, 1990, pp. 36–49.Google Scholar

4 For the steps needed for this economic growth see, Rostow, WW., Stages of Economic Growth, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 Paul, Prebisch, as director of the United Nations Commission on Latin America, laid the groundwork for the subsequent development of dependency theory by pointing out the negative trade effects of contact between ‘underdeveloped’ and ‘advanced’ countries.Google Scholar For a discussion see, McGovern, A. F., ‘Latin America and Dependency Theory’, This World, 14, 1986, pp. 104–123.Google Scholar

6 See, Preface to Capital, in Marx and Engels: Basic Writings on Politics and Philosophy, Feuer, L. S., ed., translated by S. Moore and E. Aveling, Glasgow, Collins/Fontana, 1969, pp. 174–187.Google Scholar

7 Frank, A.F., Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America: Historical Studies of Chile and Brazil, New York, Monthly Review Press, 1969.Google Scholar

8 Cardoso, F.H., Dependency and Development in Imin America. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1979.Google Scholar

9 Gutierrez, G., ‘The Meaning of development: Notes on a Theology of Liberation’ in In Search of a Theology of Development, Sodepax Report, The Committee on Society, Development and Peace, Geneva, World Council of Churches, 1969, pp. 125–126Google Scholar. He makes a similar point in A Theology of Liberation revised edition, London, SCM Press, 1988, pp. 16–17.Google Scholar

10 Gutierrez, G., The Power of the Poor in History, London, SCM Press, 1983, p. 45Google Scholar. For a discussion of the relationship between liberation theology and dependency theory see Garrett, W.R., ‘Liberation Theology and Dependency Theory’, in The Politics of Latin American Liberation Theology: The Challenge to U.S. Public Policy, Rubenstetn, R.L. and Roth, J. K., eds., Washington, The Washington Institute Press, 1988, pp. 174–198.Google Scholar

11 Gutierrez, G., The Power of the Poor in History, London, SCM Press, 1983, p. 78.Google Scholar

12 Ibid, p. 192.

13 Boff, L. and Boff, C., Introducing Liberation Theology, Tunbridge Wells, Bums and Oates, 1987, p. 30.Google Scholar

14 Heredia, F.M., ‘Christianity and Liberation: A Cuban Study of Latin American Liberation Theology’, Social Compass, 35 (213), 1988, pp. 309–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar, see especially pp. 332–342.

15 Moll, P.G., ‘Liberating Liberation Theology: Towards Independence From Dependency Theory’, Journal of Theology for Southern Africa, 78, 1992, pp. 25–40.Google Scholar

16 Ibid., p. 36.

17 Ibid., pp. 38–39.

18 Connill, L., ‘Correspondence: Lee Cormill Responds to Peter Moll’, Journal of Theology for Southern Africa, 82, 1993, pp. 88–94.Google Scholar

19 The idea of radical alternative development was pioneered by the Dag Hammarksjold Foundation in the late 1970s. See Ekins, P., A New World Order. Grassroots Movements for Global Change, London, Routledge, 1992, pp. 99–100.Google Scholar

20 Ibid, p. 100.

21 Kothari, R., ‘Environment, Technology and Ethics’, in Ethics of Environment and Development: Global Challenges, International Response, Engel, J.R. and Engel, J. G., eds., London, Belhaven Press, 1990, pp. 27–35.Google Scholar

22 Palmer, C., ‘Some Problems with Sustainability’, Studies in Christian Ethics, 7(1), 1994, pp. 52–62 (p. 53).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

23 Ibid., pp. 54–55.

24 Ibid., p. 58.

25 HIRolston, H., ‘The Wilderness Idea Affirmed’, The Environmental Professional, 13, 1991, pp. 370–377.Google Scholar

26 Naess, A., ‘Sustainable Development and Deep Ecology’, in Ethics of Environment and Development: Global Challenges, International Response, Engel, JR. and Engel, J. G., eds., London, Belhaven Press, 1990, pp. 87–96.Google Scholar

27 Sterling, S.R., ‘Towards an Ecological World View’, in Ethics of Environment and Development: Global Challenges, International Response, Engel, J.R. and Engel, J. G., eds., London, Belhaven Press, 1990, pp. 77–86.Google Scholar

28 Ibid., p. 82.

29 R. Robertson challenges the claim that Christian base communities are vehicles for liberation theology and suggests that in practice this purpose can be more ambiguous. Robertson, R., ‘Liberation Theology, Latin America and Third World Underdevelopment’, in The Politics of Latin American Liberation Theology: The Challenge to U.S. Public Policy. Rubenstein, R.L. and Roth, J. K., eds., Washington, The Washington Institute Press, 1988, pp. 117–134.Google Scholar

30 Verhelst, T, No Life Without Roots: Culture and Development, translated by Bob, Cumming, London, Zed Books, 1990, p. 158.Google Scholar

31 Ibid, p. 49. The theme of liberation is especially important in Latin American liberation theology, while that from an Asian/African origin tends to stress inculturation. The radical thrust of Latin American liberation theology has gradually moderated under the influence of the concept of enculturation. See Robertson, R., ‘Liberation Theology, Latin America and Third World Underdevelopment’ in The Politics of Latin American Liberation Theology: The Challenge to U.S. Public Policy. Rubenstein, R.L. and Roth, J. K., eds., Washington, The Washington Institute Press, 1988, pp. 117–134.Google Scholar

32 For a discussion of the integration of the cosmic and the metacosmic in an Asian theology of liberation and its rejection of the Western assumptions of Latin American liberation theology see, Pieris, A., An Asian Theology of Liberation, Edinburgh, T and T Clark, 1988Google Scholar. Also relevant is Ryan, S., ‘The Search for an Asian Spirituality of Liberation’ in Asian Christian Spirituality. Reclaiming Traditions, Fabella, V., Lee, P.K., Suh, D. Kwang‐sun, eds., Maryknoll, Orbis, 1992, pp. 11–30.Google Scholar

33 Verhelst, T., No Life Without Roots: Culture and Development, translated by Bob, Cumming, London, Zed Books, 1990, p. 50.Google Scholar For additional comment on the relationship between the ethics of culture and ecology see, Dussel, E., Ethics and Community, Bums and Oates, 1988, pp. 194–204.Google Scholar

34 Hallman, D., ed., EcoTheology: Voices from South and North, Maryknoll, Orbis, 1994.Google Scholar

35 Sowunmi, M., ‘Giver of Life‐ “Sustain Your Creation’” in EcoTheology: Voices from South and North, Hallman, D., ed., Maryknoll, Orbis, 1994, p 153Google Scholar. See also section called ‘Insights from Indigenous Peoples’, pp. 207–227, especially G. Tinker, ‘The Full Circle of Liberation’, pp. 218–224.

36 Boff, L., ‘Social Ecology: Poverty and Misery’, in ibid, p. 245.Google Scholar

37 Boff, L. and Elizondo, V., eds., Ecology and Poverty, Concilium, 5/1995, London, SCM, 1995.Google Scholar

38 Boff, L., ‘Liberation Theology and Ecology: Alternative, Confrontation or Complementary?’ in ibid, pp. 67–77.Google Scholar In the same volume Rosino Gibellini makes the point that ecology as a theme in liberation theology has only emerged after the Rio de Janeiro conference in 1992, with the publication of the articles in a book edited by Boff entitled Ecology, World and Mysticism: The Emergence of a New Paradigm (Petropolis, 1993).Google Scholar Gibellini, R., ‘The Theological Debate on Ecology’, in Boff, L. and Elizondo, V., eds., Ecology and Poverty Concilium, 5/1995, London, SCM, 1995, pp. 125–134.Google Scholar

39 Boff, L., ‘Liberation Theology and Ecology: Alternative, Confrontation or Complementary?’ in Boff, L. and Elizondo, V., eds., Ecology and Poverty, Concilium, 5/1995, London, SCM, 1995, pp. 74–75.Google Scholar

40 Hewitt, W. E., ‘Myths and Realities of Liberation Theology: The Case of Basic Christian Communities in Brazil’, in The Politics of Latin American Liberation Theology: The Challenge to U.S. Public Policy, Rubenstein, R.L. and Roth, J. K., eds., Washington, The Washington Institute Press, 1988, pp. 135–155.Google Scholar

41 See Sigmund, P.E., ‘The Development of Liberation Theology: Continuity or Change?’ in The Politics of Latin American Liberation Theology: The Challenge to U.S. Public Policy, Rubenstein, R.L. and Roth, J. K., eds., Washington, The Washington Institute Press, 1988, pp. 21–47.Google Scholar Rubenstein argues that liberation theology leads to the adoption of middle class Western values. It seems to me that his suggestion that ‘under the impact of liberation theology today's poor could become tomorrow's new secularised bourgeoisie’ (p. 81) is exaggerated. See, R. Rubenstein ‘Liberation Theology and the Crisis in Western Theology’ in ibid, pp. 71–95.

42 Kothari, R., ‘Environment, Technology and Ethics’, in Ethics of Environment and Development: Global Challenges, International Response, Engel, J.R. and Engel, J. C., eds., London, Belhaven Press, 1990, p. 34.Google Scholar

43 Moltmann, J., The Future of Creation, London, SCM, 1979, p. 5.Google Scholar

44 Ibid, pp. 110–113.

45 Boff, L. and Elizondo, V., ‘Ecology and Poverty: Cry of the Earth, Cry of the Poor’, in Boff, L. and Elizondo, V., eds., Ecology and Poverty, Concilium, 5/1995, London, SCM, 1995, pp. ix–xii.Google Scholar

46 See, for example, Primavesi, A., From Apocalypse to Genesis. Ecology, Feminism and Christianity, Tunbridge Wells, Burns and Oates, 1991Google Scholar, Radford Ruether, R., Gaia and God: An Ecofeminist Theology of Earth Healing, London, SCM, 1992Google Scholar; McFague, S., The Body of God: An Ecological Theology, London, SCM, 1993Google Scholar, Green, E. and Grey, M., eds., Ecofeminism and Theology, Yearbook of the European Society of Women in Theological Research, Kampen, Kok Pharos, 1994.Google Scholar

47 Kruijer, G., Development Through Liberation. Third World Problems and Solutions, translated by Pomeraus, A., Basingstoke, Macmillan Education, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

48 Ibid., pp. 32–33.

49 Taylor, M., Good for the Poor: Christian Ethics and World Development, London, Mowbray/Cassell, 1990, pp. 47ff.Google Scholar

50 Ghai, D., ed., Development and Environment: Sustaining People and Nature, Institute of Social Studies, Oxford, Blackwell, 1994.Google Scholar

51 Ibid, p. 8.

52 Hartley, T.W., ‘Environmental Justice: An Environmental Civil Rights Value Acceptable to all World Views’, Environmental Ethics, 17, 1995, pp. 277–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

53 For an analysis of how environmental justice affects environmental policy see Been, V., ‘What's Fairness Got to Do with It? Environmental Justice and the Siting of Locally Undesirable Land Uses’, Cornell Law Review, 78, 1993, pp. 1001–1085.Google Scholar