Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-89wxm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T23:24:41.124Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Alfred Jones and the Party Perilous or Misunderstanding Mr Graham Greene

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Abstract

What on earth is Dr Fischer of Geneva or The Bomb Party all about? Can it really be, as one reviewer believes, ‘a bitter little parable about the subservience of the rich to riches; about the despair that deepens so much every day one lives, that death in the end seems to lose its point; about the ephemerality of happiness; and about the way in which a man may finally come to despise himself so much that life becomes intolerable for him’. Seen like this, Graham Greene’s story-parable — for it certainly cannot be considered an orthodox novel — is remarkably thin and — in many respects — uninformative. There is, for example, very little serious discussion of the attitude of wealthy people to money: that gradual debilitating disease of judgment and balance which leaves the victim convinced of imminent poverty, or the stealthy atrophying of every generous impulse. It is hard to find anything to do with money that could not have been more adequately examined in a normal domestic setting of the type found in Bennett or Galsworthy, or the opening chapters of Sense and Sensibility. Neither, I am sure, would it be useful to assume that Mr Greene constructed his parable with the object of indulging his well-known interest in Russian roulette — a version of which forms the prize-winning entertainment at the last of Dr Fischer’s parties. There is a sense in which the explanations and commentaries do not seem to be able to account for the material, and yet given the brevity and apparent simplicity of the text this adds what can reasonably be regarded as a further curtain of bewilderment.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1982 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Spectator review by Francis King.

2 If the recent publication by Debrett on modern manners and etiquette is reasonably authoritative the fact that Anna‐Luise sleeps with Jones prior to their civil marriage is probably not significant.

3 Page 70: In the car Anna‐Luise said, ‘He spoke to me. He knew my name.’‘He said Anna not Anna‐Luise. He knew your mother's name.’

4 Page 103: ‘My wife in one case. My daughter in the other.’