Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T13:39:47.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lithological analysis of 45 presumed pingo remnants in the northern Netherlands (Friesland): substrate control and fill sequences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2014

S.J. Kluiving ,
A.L.L.M. Verbers  and
W.J.F. Thijs
S.J. Kluiving*
Affiliation:
Institute for Geo- and Bioarchaeology, VU University Amsterdam, the Netherlands GEO-LOGICAL, Earth Scientific Research & Consultancy, Delft, the Netherlands
A.L.L.M. Verbers
Affiliation:
Landschapsbeheer Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
W.J.F. Thijs
Affiliation:
Archaeological Research & Consultancy, Groningen, the Netherlands
*
Email: sjoerd.kluiving@falw.vu.nl.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A number of 45 presumed pingo remnants have been analysed on lithological criteria while measured parameters of pingo remnants can be compared on a spatial scale. Methods used were hand augering and radiocarbon dating. Out of 45 cored sites thirty sites proved to represent pingo remnants after having tested the results according to the set of descriptive criteria. Does a difference in filling types in a spatial analysis influence the choice of early settlers in this region? Results show that two groups of pingo remnants can be distinguished by the nature of the pingo filling. Type 1 pingo remnants with predominantly peat filling are found in the lower valleys between the higher glacial till ridges. Type 2 pingo remnants with equal loam and peat filling are predominantly found on the higher glacial till ridges. Type 2 pingo remnants generally have a greater depth, are more ellipsoid in shape, and have a steeper slope angle than type 1 pingo remnants on the lower terrain. Results indicate that the substrate character influenced the development of infilling of pingo remnants. Marshy environments may have existed for a prolonged period throughout the Holocene in pingo remnants on the glacial ridges, while pingo remnants on the lower terrain are filled in by peat bogs. Landscape evolution based on the results of a distinct dataset of pingo remnants can help to solve archaeological problems of settlement issues when combined with new palaeobotanic data and high resolution dates.

Keywords

Pingo remnantsFrieslandlandscape evolutionsubstratefill sequences
Type
Research Article
Information
Netherlands Journal of Geosciences , Volume 89 , Issue 1 , July 2010 , pp. 61 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © Stichting Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 2010

References

Bakker, R., 2003. The emergence of agriculture on the Drenthe Plateau – a palaeobotanical study supported by high resolution 14C dating. Archäologische Berichte 16. Bonn.Google Scholar
Bijlsma, S. & De Lange, G.W., 1983. Geology, palynology and age of a pingo remnant near Daarle, Province of Overijssel, the Netherlands. In: Terwindt, J.H.J. & Van Steijn, H. (eds): Developments in physical geography; a tribute to J.I.S. Zonneveld. Geologie en Mijnbouw, 62: 563–568.Google Scholar
Bos, J.A.A. & Janssen, C.R., 1996. Local impact of Palaeolithic man on the environment during the end of the Last Glacial in the Netherlands. Journal of Archaeological Science 23: 731–739.Google Scholar
Bosch, J.H.A., 1990. Assen West (12W) en Assen Oost (12O). Toelichtingen bij de Geologische kaart van Nederland 1 : 50,000. Rijks Geologische Dienst (Haarlem): 1–168 pp.Google Scholar
Bosch, J.H.A., 2000. Standaard Boor Beschrijvingsmethode (en NEN5104), Versie 5.1. TNO-rapport NITG 00-141-A: 106 pp.Google Scholar
Bottema, S., Groenendijk, H.A. & Mook-Kamps, E., 1990. Archeologisch en palynologisch onderzoek van een pingo te Wildervank (Gr.). Paleo-aktueel 2: 15–18.Google Scholar
Davies, S.M., Hoek, W.Z., Bohncke, S.J.P., Lowe, J.J., Pyne O'Donnell, S. & Turney, C.S.M., 2005. Detection of Lateglacial distal tephra layers in the Netherlands. Boreas, 34: 123–135.Google Scholar
De Gans, W., 1982. Location, age and origin of pingo remnants in the Drentsche Aa Valley area (the Netherlands). Geologie en Mijnbouw 61: 147–158.Google Scholar
De Gans, W., 1988. Pingo remnants and their identification. In: Clark, M.J. (ed.) Advances in periglacial geomorphology. John Wiley & Sons (Chichester, United Kingdom): 299–322.Google Scholar
De Gans, W., 2000. Het Uddelermeer, een geologische schatkamer. Natuur & Techniek, 12 2000, 54–58.Google Scholar
De Groot, Th.A.M., Cleveringa, P. & Klijnstra, B., 1989. Seizoens-ijsheuvels, een bijzonder geologisch verschijnsel. Grondboor en Hamer, jrg. 43, 1: 1–10.Google Scholar
De Groot, Th.A.M., Cleveringa, P. & Klijnstra, B., 1987. Frost-mound remnants and the evolution of a Late Dryas environment (northern Netherlands). Geologie en Mijnbouw 66: 239–250.Google Scholar
Doppert, J.W.C., Ruegg, G.H.J., Van Staalduinen, C.J., Zagwijn, W.H. & Zandstra, J.G., 1975. Formaties van het Kwartair en Boven-Tertiair in Nederland. In: Zagwijn, W.H. & Van Staalduinen, C.J. (eds): Toelichting bij geologische overzichtskaarten van Nederland. Rijks Geologische Dienst, Haarlem: 11–56.Google Scholar
Hoek, W.Z. & Bohncke, S.J.P., 2002. Climatic and environmental events over the Last Termination as recorded in The Netherlands: a review. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 81: 123–137.Google Scholar
Hoek, W.Z., 2005. Tefrochronologie. Grondboor & Hamer, 3: 72–76.Google Scholar
Kasse, K. & Bohncke, S.J.P., 1992. Weichselien Upper Pleniglacial Aeolian and Ice-cored Morphology in the southern Netherlands (Noord-Brabant, Groote Peel). Permafrost & Periglacial Processes, 3: 327–342.Google Scholar
Kluiving, S.J. & Verbers, A., 2007. Evaluatie van het onderzoek naar vijfenveertig locaties van vermeende pingoruïnes in het oosten van de Provincie Friesland: Pingo Project Fryslân (PPF) en Catalogus Pingo Project Fryslân 2006-2007. ISSN 1872-2350, GEO-LOGICAL reeks 02 (incl. cd-rom) (Delft): 28 pp.Google Scholar
Maarleveld, G.C. & Van den Toorn, J.C., 1955. Pseudo-solle in Noord-Nederland. Tijdschrift Koninklijk Nederlands Aardrijkskundig Genootschap, 72: 344–360.Google Scholar
Mackay, J.R., 1998. Pingo growth and collapse, Tuktoyatuk peninsula area, Western Arctic Coast, Canada: a long-term field study. Géographie Physique et Quaternaire, 52: 271–323.Google Scholar
Nossin, J.J., 1961. De reliëfontwikkeling in Zuidoostelijk Friesland. Boven Boorne gebied. Wâldrige 9, 178: 48–70.Google Scholar
Paris, F.G., Cleveringa, P. & De Gans, W., 1979. The Stokersdobbe; geology and palynology of a deep pingo remnant in Friesland (the Netherlands). Geologie en Mijnbouw, 58: 33–38.Google Scholar
Van Geel, B., Bohncke, S.J.P. & Dee, H., 1981. A palaeoecological study of an upper late glacial Holocene sequence from the ‘De Borchert’, the Netherlands. Review of Paleobotany and Palynology, 31, 367–448.Google Scholar
Van der Meulen, S., 1988. The spatial facies of a group of pingo remnants on the southeast Frisian till plateau (the Netherlands). Geologie en Mijnbouw 67: 61–74.Google Scholar
Zagwijn, W.H., 1973. Pollenanalytic studies of Holsteinian and Saalian Beds in the northern Netherlands. Mededelingen Rijks Geologische Dienst, N.S., 24: 139–156.Google Scholar