No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
M. Gavouneli, Pollution from Offshore Installations, Graham & Trotman, London1995, International Environmental Law and Policy Series, doctoral thesis Cambridge University, pp. XIX + 288 pp. ISBN 1-85966-18-6.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 May 2009
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Book Reviews
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © T.M.C. Asser Press 1998
References
1. London, 17 December 1976, 16 ILM (1977) p. 1450; also published in Hohman, H., ed., Basic Documents of International Environmental Law (London, Graham & Trotman 1992) No. 48d.Google Scholar
2. Brussels, 29 november 1969, Trb. 1970 No. 196; 9 ILM (1970) p. 45; as amended by the Protocol of 1984, Trb. 1986 No. 13 and the Protocol of 1992, IMO Document LEG/CONF.9/15 (The 1992 Liability Convention). See generally Wilkinson, D., ‘Moving the Boundaries of Compensable Environmental Damage Caused by Marine Oil Spills: The Effect of Two New International Protocols’, 5 Journal of Environmental Law (1993) p. 71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Rb. Rotterdam 8 January 1979, 11 NYIL (1980) p. 326; 28 NILR (1981) p. 63, note by Duintjer Tebbens; see also 49 RabelsZ (1985) p. 741.
4. Convention on International Liability for Damage caused by Space Objects, London, Moscow and Washington, 29 March 1972, 10 ILM (1972) p. 965.
5. Protocol between Canada and the USSR, Moscow, 2 April 1981, 20 ILM (1981) p. 689.
6. Cf., the Protocol to Amend the Vienna Convention on Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage, Vienna, 12 September 1997, http://www.iaea.org (the 1997 Vienna Convention).
7. Cf., the Dutch judgment of n. 3. The case is just cited in fn. 11 (p. 90) and fn. 112 (p. 105).
8. See generally Doeker, G. and Gehring, Th., ‘Private or International Liability for Transnational Environmental Damage - the Precedent of Conventional Liability Regimes’, 2 Journal of Environmental Law (1990) p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. N. 2.
10. See in particular the Paris Convention on Third Party Liability in the Field of Nuclear Energy, consolidated text in Trb. 1981 No. 181 and the Vienna Convention on Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage of 21 May 1963, Trb. 1964 No. 177; 2 ILM (1963) p. 727.
11. N. 6.
12. ‘Civil Liability for Damage Resulting from Activities Dangerous to the Environment’, Lugano, 21 June 1993, ETS No. 150; Trb. 1993 No. 149; 32 ILM (1993) p. 1228.
13. Betlem, G., Civil Liability for Transfrontier Pollution (London, Graham & Trotman 1993) p. 122.Google Scholar
14. See for a recent overview Wetterstein, P., ed., Harm to the Environment: the Right to Compensation and the Assessment of Damages (Oxford, Clarendon Press 1997).Google Scholar
15. Lefeber, R., Transboundary Environmental Interference and the Origin of State Liability (The Hague, Kluwer Law International 1996).Google Scholar
16. Agence Europe No. 6903, 30 January 1997, p. 5.
17. Communication from the Commission to the Council and Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee: Green Paper on Remedying Environmental Damage, COM(93)47.
18. See the Draft Articles of a Protocol on Liability and Compensation for Damage Resulting from the Transboundary Movement of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal, UNEP/CHW.1/WG.1/1/5.
19. In the form of an annex to the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty of 4 October 1994, 30 ILM (1991) p. 1455; see C. Langenfeld, ‘Verhandlungen über ein neues Umwelthaftungsregime für die Antarktis - Innovationen für ein Internationales Haftungsrecht’, 15 Natur und Recht (1994) p. 338. Cf., the earlier Convention on the Regulation of Antarctic Mineral Resource Activities (CRAMRA), Wellington, 2 June 1988, not in force, 27 ILM (1988) p. 859; Hohmann, op. cit. n. 1, No. 67a.