Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T15:59:22.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Impact of International Business Transfers on Employment Contracts*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2009

Herbert Kronke
Get access

Extract

After ten years of EEC-guided harmonization of domestic legislation in the field of employees' rights in business transfers, the discussion seems to be gaining, rather than losing, momentum. In the beginning there was, on the part of the Commission, an awareness that divergent domestic rules as to the retention of rights and benefits of employees necessarily resulted in differing costs of business transfers jeopardizing the very prerequisites of a Common Market.

Type
Articles
Information
Netherlands International Law Review , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , May 1989 , pp. 1 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © T.M.C. Asser Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Official Journal of the European Communities(OJ) No. L 61, 5 03 1977Google Scholar; Bartlett, M. A. S., ‘Employees' Rights in Mergers and Take-overs – EEC Proposals and the American Approach’, 25 ICLQ (1976) p. 621 et seqCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2. Dauses, M. A., ‘La jurisprudence de la Cour de Justice des Communautés Européennes rélative au droit du travail, notamment à la directive 77/187’, JT Trav. (1988) p. 1 et seqGoogle Scholar.

3. Proposal for a Council Directive on the Harmonisation of the Legislation of Member States on the Retention of the Rights and Advantages of Employees in the Case of Mergers, Takeovers and Amalgamations, 31 May, 1974, OJ No. C 104, 11 September 1974.

4. See Bartlett, , loc. cit. n. 1, p. 634Google Scholar.

5. Com. (75) 653 final, with Explanatory Memorandum. For comments see Hepple, B. A., ‘Conflict of Laws on Employment Relationships within the EEC’, in Lipstein, K., ed., Harmonisation of Private International Law by the EEC (1978) p. 39Google Scholar; Kronke, H., ‘Europäische Vereinheitlichung des Arbeitskollisionsrechts als Wirtschafts- und Sozialpolitik’, 45 RabelsZ (1981) p. 301 et seqGoogle Scholar.

6. Explanatory Memorandum, supra p. 43.

7. OJ No. L 266, 9 October 1980 and the report by Professors M. Giuliano and P. Lagarde, OJ No. C 282, 31 October 1980. On its relevance for employment relationships, see Gamillscheg, F., ‘Neue Entwicklungen im englischen und europäischen internationalen Arbeitsrecht’, 25 Recht der internationalen Wirtschaft (1979) p. 225 et seq.Google Scholar; Pocar, F., ‘Kodifikation der Kollisionsnormen auf dem Gebiete des Vertragsrechts im Rahmen der Europaischen Gemeinschaften’, 25 Recht der internationalen Wirtschaft (1979) p. 384 et seq.Google Scholar; idem, in Italian National Reports to the XIth International Congress of Comparative Law, Caracas 1982(1982) p. 169; Hepple, loc. cit. n. 5; Kronke, loccit. n. 5; Morse, D. A., ‘Contracts of Employment and the EEC Contractual Obligations Convention’, in North, P. M., ed., Contract Conflicts. The EEC Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations: A Comparative Study (1982) p. 143 et seqGoogle Scholar.

8. Denmark and Luxembourg simply enacted statutes incorporating the Convention's text into domestic law. Belgium adopted a slightly different approach. The Federal Republic transformed the Convention by integrating it into the Introductory Law to the Civil Code (EGBGB), but not without numerous ‘adaptations’ of the Convention's system and wording. This has been criticized by the academic community and the Commission: 5 Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (1985) p. 178. As to the Netherlands, see Advocatenblad (8 08 1987) No. 14Google Scholar. For an exhaustive analysis, see Jayme, E. and Kohler, C., ‘Das Internationale Privat- und Verfahrensrecht der Europäischen Gemeinschaften- Jüngste Entwicklungen’, 8 Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (1988) p. 133 et seqGoogle Scholar. For an assessment of the transformation legislation's impact on German international labour law see Gamillscheg, F., ‘Ein Gesetz über das internationale Arbeitsrecht’, 14 Zeitschrift für Arbeitsrecht (1983) p. 307 et seq.Google Scholar; Kronke, H., ‘Das Arbeitsrecht im Gesetzentwurf zur Neuregelung des IPR’, Der Betrieb (1984) p. 404 et seq.Google Scholar; Däubler, W., ‘Das neue Internationale Arbeitsrecht’, 33 Recht der internationalen Wirtschaft (1987) p. 249 et seqGoogle Scholar.

9. Dicey, and Morris, , The Conflict of Laws, vol. 2, 10th edn. (1980) p. 824Google Scholar.

10. Vischer, F., Internationales Vertragsrecht (1962) p. 245Google Scholar; Kegel, G., Internationales Privatrecht, 6th edn. (1987) p. 481Google Scholar.

11. Venturini, G., Diritto internazionale privato (1956) p. 172Google Scholar.

12. Martiny, D., in Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch, vol. 7, Einführungsgesetz. Internationales Privatrecht (1983) Schuldrecht, vor Art. 12 No. 140Google Scholar; Kegel, , op. cit. n. 10, p. 482Google Scholar; Vischer, , op. cit. n. 10, p. 250Google Scholar; Zweigert, K., ‘Das Statut der Vertragsübernahme’, 23 RabelsZ (1958) p. 643 et seqGoogle Scholar.

13. Cass. 2.4. 1970, Pasicrisie belge 1970 I 658.

14. Cass. (ch. soc.) 23.10.1974, Rev. crit. (1976) p. 87 (note Lyon-Caën).

15. See Kronke, H., Rechtstatsachen, kollisionsrechtliche Methodenentfaltung und Arbeitnehmerschutz irri internationalen Arbeitsrecht (1980) pp. 116–119Google Scholar.

16. Cass. (ch. soc) 5.2.1975, Rev. crit. (1976) p. 108 (note Lyon-Caën).

17. Thus the Cour d'Appel de Paris in the case cited, at supra n. 14, and the Labour Court of Appeal Hamburg, infra n. 28.

18. Birk, R., ‘Die multinationalen Korporationen im internationalen Arbeitsrecht’, 18 Berichte der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Völkerrecht (1978) p. 263 et seq., at p. 292Google Scholar.

19. Gamillscheg, F., Internationales Arbeitsrecht (1959) p. 237Google Scholar; Zweigert, , loc. cit. n. 12, pp. 652, 657Google Scholar; Kronke, H., ‘Betriebsveräuβerung und Kündigungsschutz im internationalen Arbeitsrecht’, 1 Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (1981) p. 157 et seq., at p. 159Google Scholar; Martiny, , loc. cit. n. 12, No. 194Google Scholar.

20. Rehbinder, E., in Deutsche zivil- und kollisionsrechtliche Beiträge zum IX. Internationalen Kongreβ für Rechtsvergleichung in Teheran 1974 (1974) p. 122 et seq., at p. 135Google Scholar; Birk, , loc. cit, n. 18, pp. 288, 314Google Scholar.

21. BAG 14. 10. 1982, Der Betrieb (1983) p. 2635.

22. Cass. (ch. soc.) 6.7.1982, Bulletin des arrets de la Cour de cassation, Chambres civiles (Bull, civ.) V, No. 451; Lyon-Caën, G., ‘Observations sur le licenciement dans les groupes internationaux de sociétés’, Rev. crit. (1974) p. 439 et seqGoogle Scholar.

23. Hoge Raad 13. 5. 1966, NJ 1967 No. 3. Legal doctrine had discussed the matter since the 1940s, especially in the Netherlands and Germany (e. g., Wengler, Zweigert, de Winter). For detailed analysis of the Alnati-Arrest, see van Rooij, R., De positie van publiekrechtelijke regels op het terrein van het internationaal privaatrecht (1976) p. 237 et seq.Google Scholar; also Verheul, J. P., Rechtsfinding in het internationaal privaatrecht(1973) p. 43Google Scholar. Comparative studies on the subject-matter include Drobnig, U., ‘Comments on Art. 7 of the Draft Convention’, in Lando, O. et al. , eds., European Private International Law of Obligations (1975) p. 82 et seq.Google Scholar; Kronke, , op. cit. n. 15, pp. 97–147Google Scholar (with special reference to labour law conflicts); Philip, A., ‘Mandatory Rules, Public Law (Political Rules) and Choice of Law in the E. E. C. Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations’, in North, , ed., op. cit. n. 7, p. 81 et seq.Google Scholar; B. von Hoffmann, ‘Assessment of the E. E. C. Convention from a German Point of View’, ibid., p. 221 et seq., at p. 229 et seq. On the present state of the discussion, see van Rooij, R. and Polak, M. V., Private International Law in the Netherlands (1987) pp. 129–131Google Scholar; van Maanen, G. E., in Netherlands Reports to the Eleventh International Congress of Comparative Law, Caracas 1982 (1982) p. 149Google Scholar; Schultsz, J. C., ‘Dutch Antecedents and Parallels to Article 7 of the EEC Contracts Convention of 1980’, 47 RabelsZ (1983) p. 267 et seqGoogle Scholar.

24. See Kreuzer, K. F., ‘Erklärung eines generellen Vorbehalts zu Art. 7 des Übereinkommens vom 19. 6. 1980’, 4 Praxis des International Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (1984) p. 293 et seq.Google Scholar; Martiny, D., ‘Der deutsche Vorbehalt gegen Art. 7 Abs. 1 des EG-Schuldvertragsübereinkommens vom 19. 6. 1980’, 7 Praxis des International Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (1987) p. 277 et seq.Google Scholar; Jayme, and Kohler, , loc. cit. n. 8, p. 137Google Scholar.

25. Martiny, loccit. n. 24.

26. For the Netherlands, see Hoge Raad12.1.1979, NJ 1980 No. 527 (note Schultsz), also in Rev. crit. (1980) p. 68 (note Van Rooij). For Germany (in a comparative perspective), see Basedow, J., ‘Private Law Effects of Foreign Export Controls – An International Case Report’, 27 GYIL (1984) p. 109 et seq.Google Scholar; Drobnig, U., ‘Die Beachtung von ausländischen Eingrifsgesetzen- eine Interessenanalyse’, in Festschrift für Neumayer (1985) p. 159 et seqGoogle Scholar.

27. Kronke, , loc. cit. n. 19, p. 160Google Scholar.

28. LAG Hamburg 22. 10. 1979, 1 Praxis des internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (1981) p. 175Google Scholar.

29. Supra n. 19.

30. ArbG Hamburg 21. 9. 1983 – S 15 Ca 404/82 (obiter); 24. 10. 1986, S 1 Ca 84/86 (both still unpublished). In legal doctrine the same view was taken by Putzo, H., in Palandt, O., Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, 45th edn. (1986) paragraph 613a No. 1Google Scholar and Martiny, , in Reithmann, C. and Martiny, D., Internationales Vertragsrecht, 4th edn. (1988) No. 735Google Scholar. The authors have advised me that a different view will be taken by U. Drobnig and H.J. Puttfarken, Arbeitskampfrecht auf Schiffen fremder Flagge(forthcoming).

31. Horn, N., ed., Adaptation and Renegotiation of Contracts in International Trade and Finance (1985)Google Scholar.

32. For a (rare) treatment of the various aspects of this problem in English legal literature see Wolff, M., Private International Law, 2nd edn. (1950) pp. 160–166Google Scholar. Continental writers dedicating thorough analysis to this topic include Offerhaus, J., Aanpassing in het internationaal privaatrecht (1963)Google Scholar and Kegel, , op. cit. n. 10, p. 216 et seqGoogle Scholar.

33. Riva-Sanseverino, L., in Scialoja, A. and Branca, G., eds., Commentario del Codice civile Art. 2060- 2134 (1977) pp. 471, 472Google Scholar.

34. S. H. R. 20. 9. 1985, cited in Andersen, L. S., Lov om løanmodtageres retsstilling ved virksomhedsoverdragelse (1986) p. 55Google Scholar.

35. Cass. (ch. soc.) 9.5.1974, Bull civ. 278; 10.5.1976, Bull. civ. 238; 31.5.1978, Bull. civ. 1978, 310.

36. BAG 12. 5. 1976, Sammlung See-Arbeitsrechtlicher Entscheidungen, §613 a BGB, No.l.

37. See, for Belgium, , van Hoogenbemt, H., Bedrijfsoverdracht naar Europees en Belgisch sociaal recht (1983) p. 28 et. seqGoogle Scholar. with references to judicial decisions.

38. Seiter, H., Betriebsinhaberwechsel (1980) p. 52Google Scholar.