Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T16:25:55.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Widening Socio-Economic Gap in UK Higher Education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Fernando Galindo-Rueda
Affiliation:
Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Centre for the Economics of Education
Oscar Marcenaro-Gutierrez
Affiliation:
Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Centre for the Economics of Education
Anna Vignoles*
Affiliation:
Institute of Education and Centre for the Economics of Education

Abstract

This paper provides up-to-date empirical evidence on the socio-economic gap in higher education (HE) participation, for the period spanning the introduction of tuition fees. We assess whether the gap has widened and ask whether the socio-economic gap emerges on entry into university or much earlier in the education system. We do this in two ways. Firstly we consider the likelihood of going to university for school leavers in poor neighbourhoods and analyse changes in this likelihood over time. Secondly, we use more detailed individual level data to model the determinants of HE participation, focusing on changes in the relationship between family background and HE participation over time. We find that the growth in HE participation amongst poorer students has been remarkably high, mainly because it was starting from such a low base. However, the gap between rich and poor, in terms of HE participation, has widened during the 1990s. Children from poor neighbourhoods have become relatively less likely to participate in HE since 1994/5, as compared to children from richer neighbourhoods. This trend started before the introduction of tuition fees. Much of the class difference in HE participation seems to reflect inequalities at earlier stages of the education system.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barr, N. (2002), ‘Funding higher education: policies for access and quality’, House of Commons Education and Skills Committee, Post-16 student support, Session 2001-02, 24 April 2002.Google Scholar
Barr, N. and Crawford, I. (1998), ‘The Dearing Report and the government response: a critique’, Political Quarterly, 69, 1, January-March, pp. 7284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benabou, R. (1996), ‘Equity and efficiency in human capital investment: the local connection’, Review of Economic Studies, 62, pp. 237–64.Google Scholar
Blanden, J. and Machin, S. (2003), ‘Educational inequality and the expansion of UK higher education’, mimeo, London School of Economics, Centre for Economic Performance.Google Scholar
Callender, C. (2003), ‘Student financial support in higher education: access and exclusion’, in Tight, M. (ed.), Access and Exclusion: International Perspectives on Higher Education Research, London, Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Cameron, S. and Heckman, J. (2001), ‘The dynamics of educational attainment of black, hispanic and white males’, Journal of Political Economy, 109, pp. 455–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carneiro, J., Hansen, K. and Heckman, J. (2003), ‘Estimating distribution of counterfactuals with an application to the returns to schooling and measurement of the effect of uncertainty on schooling choice, International Economic Review.Google Scholar
Currie, J. and Thomas, D. (1999), ‘Early test scores, socioeconomic status and future outcomes’, NBER Working Paper No. 6943, Cambridge, MA., National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dearden, L., McIntosh, S., Myck, M. and Vignoles, A. (2002), ‘The returns to academic, vocational and basic skills in Britain’, Bulletin of Economic Research, 54, 3, pp. 249–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolton, P., Greenaway, D. and Vignoles, A. (1997), ‘Whither higher education? An economic perspective for the Dearing Committee of Inquiry’, Economic Journal, 107, 442, pp. 710–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolton, P.J., Makepeace, G.H., Gannon, B.M. (2001), ‘The earnings and employment effects of young people's vocational training in Britain’, Manchester School, 69, 4, pp. 387417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erickson, R. and Goldthorpe, J. (1992), ‘The constant flux: a study of class mobility in industrial societies’, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fernandez, R. and Rogerson, R. (1996), ‘Income distribution, communities, and the quality of public education’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111, 1, pp. 135–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galindo-Rueda, F. and Vignoles, A., ‘The declining relative importance of ability in predicting educational attainment’, Journal of Human Resources and CEE Discussion Paper (both forthcoming).Google Scholar
Gibbons, S. (2001), ‘Paying for good neighbours? Neighbourhood deprivation and the community benefits of education’, Centre for the Economics of Education, Discussion Paper No. 17, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
Glennerster, H. (2001), ‘United Kingdom education 1997-2001’, CASE Paper 50, Centre for the Analysis of Social Exclusion.Google Scholar
Greenaway, D. and Haynes, M. (2003), ‘Funding higher education in the UK: the role of fees and loans’, Economic Journal, 113, F150167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haveman, R. and Wolfe, B. (1995), ‘The determinants of children's attainments: a review of methods and findings’, Journal of Economic Literature, 33, 4, pp. 1829–78.Google Scholar
Howieson, C. and Croxford, L. (1996), ‘Using the YCS to analyse the outcomes of careers education and guidance’, The Stationary Office, DFEE Research Series, London.Google Scholar
Lynn, P. (1996), England and Wales Youth Cohort Study: The Effect of Time Between Contacts, Questionnaire Length, Personalisation and Other Factors on Response to the YCS (Research Studies), London, The Stationery Office Books.Google Scholar
Payne, J. (2001), Patterns of Participation in Full-time Education after 16: An Analysis of the England and Wales Youth Cohort Study, London, Department for Education and Skills.Google Scholar
Payne, J., Cheng, Y. and Witherspoon, S. (1996), Education and Training for 16-18 Year Olds in England and Wales - Individual paths and national trends, London, Policy Studies Institute.Google Scholar
Machin, S. and Vignoles, A. (2004), ‘Education inequality’, Fiscal Studies, 25, 2, pp. 107–28.Google Scholar
Rice, P. (1999), ‘The impact of local labour markets on investment in further education: evidence from the England and Wales youth cohort studies’, Journal of Population Economics, 12, 2, pp. 287–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, P. (2004), ‘Education and training post-16 - differences across the British regions’, CEE conference, March.Google Scholar
Saunders, P. (1997), ‘Social mobility in Britain: an empirical evaluation of two competing explanations’, Sociology, May.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sianesi, B. (2003), ‘Returns to education: a non-technical summary of CEE work and policy discussion’, draft report for Department for Education and Skills.Google Scholar
Schoon, I., Bynner, J., Joshi, H., Parsons, S., Wiggins, RD., and Sacker, A. (2002), ‘The influence of context, timing, and duration of risk experiences for the passage from childhood to mid-adulthood’, Child development, Sep-Oct, 73, 5, pp. 14861504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodhall, M. (ed.) (2002), ‘Paying for learning: the debate on student fees, grants and loans in international perspective’, The Welsh Journal of Education, 11, 1.Google Scholar