Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T09:28:13.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ANOTHER LOOK AT A SENSIBLE FISCAL POLICY FOR THE SHARP RISE IN GOVERNMENT DEBT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2023

Forrest Capie ,
Meyrick Chapman ,
Chris Marsh  and
Geoffrey Wood
Forrest Capie*
Affiliation:
Bayes Business School, City, University of London
Meyrick Chapman
Affiliation:
Hedge Analytics Ltd.
Chris Marsh
Affiliation:
Exante Data
Geoffrey Wood
Affiliation:
Bayes Business School, City, University of London, and University of Buckingham
*
Corresponding author: Forrest Capie; Email: f.h.capie@city.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper weighs possible medium-term responsible policy choices to the extraordinary expansion of government spending in response to the COVID-19 outbreak. The paper is divided into two parts. In part 1 of the paper, we look at conventional debt sustainability and question whether conventional rules created during a period of high interest rates and high inflation remain relevant. Current and future conditions support a case for government debt/GDP to remain elevated compared to history, conditional upon limited state interference in the economy to allow appropriate allocation of capital and resources. In part 2, we consider the historical experience of the United Kingdom. History shows the country had several examples of rapid, large-scale expansion of government debt relative to the size of the economy. On each occasion, the elevated level of debt-to-GDP was later reduced by a combination of relatively benign factors, including commitment to low inflation and sound monetary system. This supported the financial probity of the UK government and allowed it to continue to borrow unimpeded.

Keywords

DebtgrowthInterest ratesWarE62H63N1
Type
Research Article
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 263 , Spring 2023 , pp. 94 - 103
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of National Institute Economic Review

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, W.A. (2012a), ‘Quantitative monetary policy and government debt management in Britain since 1919’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 28, 4, pp. 804–36. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/oxrep/grs030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard, O. (2019), Public Debt: Fiscal and Welfare Costs in a Time of Low Interest Rates. Peterson Institute for International Economics Policy Brief 19–2.Google Scholar
Blanchard, O.J., Chouraqui, J.C., Hagemann, R.P. and Sartor, N., (1991), ‘The sustainability of fiscal policy: New answers to an old question’, OECD Economic Studies, 15, 15, pp. 15–21.Google Scholar
Buiter, W., Giancarlo, C. and Nouriel, R. (1993), ‘Excessive deficits: Sense and nonsense in the Treaty of Maastricht’, Economic Policy, 8, 57–100. Also translated into Italian and published as “Disavanzo eccessivo, ragionevolezza e nonsenso nel Trattato di Maastricht,” in Rivista Di Politica Economica, June 1993, 3–82. Reprinted in The Political Economy of Monetary Union, edited by Paul de Grauwe, pp. 297–331, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, Cheltenham, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cagan, P. (1965), Determinants and Effects of Changes in the Stock of Money, 1875–1960. New York: Columbia University Press for the National Bureau of Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar
Capie, F. (1986), ‘Conditions in which hyperinflation has appeared’, in Brummer, K. and Meltzer, A.H. (eds), Carnegie-Rochester Public Policy Series, Reprinted in Capie (ed.) Major Inflations in History, Aldershot: Edward ElgarGoogle Scholar
Capie, F. and Wood, G. (2015), ‘Central bank independence: Can it survive a crisis?’ in Owen, H. (eds), Current Federal Reserve Policy Under the Lens of Economic History, New York: CUP.Google Scholar
Chadha, J.S. (2016), ‘Fiscal policy after the referendum’, National Institute Economic Review, 238, 1, pp. F4–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/002795011623800103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Index-Linked Shift to CPI (2023), available online at https://ehs.org.uk/index-linked-gilts-and-the-end-of-rpi/.Google Scholar
Keep, M. (2023), ‘The UK’s fiscal targets, House of Commons Library’, available online at https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-9329/CBP-9329.pdf.Google Scholar
Macaulay, T.B. (1848), The History of England, from the Accession of James II — Volume 4.Google Scholar
Pigou, A.C. (1928), A Study in Public Finance, London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Bloise, G., Polemarchakis, H. and Vailakis, Y. (2021), ‘Sustainable debt’, Theoretical Economics, 16, 4, pp. 1513–55. https://doi.org/10.3982/te4173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadha, J.S. (2019), ‘Monetary and fiscal options in the event of a ‘no-deal Brexit.’ National Institute Economic Review, 249, 1, F4–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, W. (2012b), Government debt management and monetary policy in Britain since 1919, Bank for International eds., Threat of fiscal dominance? Bank for International Settlements, number 65, pp. 15–50.Google Scholar