Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T16:40:58.245Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Business Models of Large Interconnected Banks and the Lessons of the Financial Crisis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Abstract

This paper looks at the urgent and ongoing need to change the business models of global systemically important banks — particularly those that dominate the OTC derivatives markets which carry massive counterparty risk via collateralisation practices. It explores the three main lessons of the financial crisis: too big to fail, excess leverage and conflicts of interest. While regulatory reforms have been plentiful, none have adequately addressed the main source of the problems which lie in the very nature of the business models of large interconnected banks.

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

∗∗

Groupe d'Economie Mondiale de Sciences-Po; e-mail: patkinson@noos.fr. The views in this article are those of the authors and do not purport to represent those of the OECD or its member countries.

References

Blundell-Wignall, A. (2007a), ‘Innovation, growth and equity’, speech at the OECD Forum, May.Google Scholar
Blundell-Wignall, A. (2007b), ‘Structured products: implications for financial markets’, Financial Market Trends, issue 2, OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blundell-Wignall, A. (2012), ‘Ratings agencies issues’, presentation to the French Senate, 27 March.Google Scholar
Blundell-Wignall, A.Atkinson, P.E. (2008), ‘The subprime crisis: causal distortions and regulatory reform’, in Bloxham, P.Kent, C. (eds), Lessons from the Financial Turmoil of 2007 and 2008, Reserve Bank of Australia, July.Google Scholar
Blundell-Wignall, A.Atkinson, P.E. (2010), ‘Thinking beyond Basel III: necessary solutions for capital and liquidity’, Financial Market Trends, issue 1, OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blundell-Wignall, A.Atkinson, P.E. (2011), ‘Global SIFIs, derivatives and financial stability’, Financial Market Trends, issue 1, OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blundell-Wignall, A.Atkinson, P.E. (2012), ‘Deleveraging, traditional versus capital markets banking and the urgent need to separate GSIFI banks’, Financial Market Trends, issue 1, OECD.Google Scholar
Blundell-Wignall, A.Wehinger, G.Slovik, P. (2009), ‘The elephant in the room: the need to focus on what banks do’, Financial Market Trends, issue 2, OECD.Google Scholar
Duffie, D. (2012), ‘Market making under the proposed Volcker rule’, Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford University Working Paper no. 106.Google Scholar
Financial Stability Board (2011), Effective Resolution of Systemically Important Financial Institutions: Recommendations and Timelines, FSB Consultative Document.Google Scholar
Financial Stability Oversight Council (2012), Study and Recommendations on Prohibitions on Proprietary Trading and Certain Relationships with Hedge Funds and Private Equity Funds, January.Google Scholar
General Accounting Office (2009), Troubled Asset Relief Program, Report to Congressional Committees, ‘Status of Government Assistance Provided to AIG’, September.Google Scholar
ISDA (2012), ISDA Margin Survey 2012, International Swaps and Derivatives Association, May.Google Scholar
OECD (2009), The Financial Crisis: Reform and Exit Strategies, Paris, OECD.Google Scholar
OECD (2010), Competition and Credit Rating Agencies, Hearings of the OECD Competition Committee.Google Scholar
UBS (2008), Shareholder Report on UBS Write-Downs, UBS, AG, 18 April.Google Scholar
Vaughan, L. (2011), ‘Financial alchemy foils capital rules as EU banks redefine risk’, Bloomberg News, 9 September.Google Scholar
Zhou, J.Rutledge, V.Bossu, W.Dobler, M.Jassaud, N.More, M. (2012), ‘From bail-out to bail-in: mandatory debt restructuring of systemic financial institutions’, IMF Staff Discussion Note, 12/03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar