Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T16:32:20.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The norm estimate of the difference between the Kac operator and the Schrödinger semigroup: A unified approach to the nonrelativistic and relativistic cases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2016

Takashi Ichinose
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, 920-1192, Japan, ichinose@kappa.s.kanazawa-u.ac.jp
Satoshi Takanobu
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, 920-1192, Japan, takanobu@kappa.s.kanazawa-u.ac.jp
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract.

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An Lp operator norm estimate of the difference between the Kac operator and the Schrödinger semigroup is proved and used to give a variant of the Trotter product formula for Schrödinger operators in the Lp operator norm. The method of the proof is probabilistic based on the Feynman-Kac formula. The problem is discussed in the relativistic as well as nonrelativistic case.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Editorial Board of Nagoya Mathematical Journal 1998

References

[1] Dia, Boun O. and Schatzman, Michelle, An estimate on the Kac transfer operator, J. Funct. Anal, 145 (1997), 108135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Doumeki, Atsushi, Takashi Ichinose and Hideo Tamura, Error bound on exponential product formulas for Schrödinger operators, to appear in J. Math. Soc. Japan, 50 (1998).Google Scholar
[3] Arthur, Erdélyi, Higher Transcendental Functions, II, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1953.Google Scholar
[4] Bernard, Helffer, Spectral properties of the Kac operator in large dimension, Centre de Recherches Math., CRM Proceedings and Lecture Notes, 8 (1995), 179211.Google Scholar
[5] Bernard, Helffer, Correlation decay and gap of the transfer operator, Algebra i Analiz (St. Petersburg Math. J.), 8 (1996), 192210.Google Scholar
[6] Bernard, Helffer, Around the transfer operator and the Trotter-Kato formula, Operator Theory: Advances and Appl., 78 (1995), 161174.Google Scholar
[7] Takashi, Ichinose, Essential selfadjointness of the Weyl quantized relativistic Hamiltonian, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré, Phys. Théor., 51 (1989), 265298.Google Scholar
[8] Takashi, Ichinose and Satoshi, Takanobu, Estimate of the difference between the Kac operator and the Schrödinger semigroup, Commun. Math. Phys., 186 (1997), 167197.Google Scholar
[9] Takashi, Ichinose and Hideo, Tamura, Error estimates in operator norm for Trotter-Kato product formula, Integr. Equat. Oper. Theory, 27 (1997), 195207.Google Scholar
[10] Takashi, Ichinose and Hiroshi, Tamura, Imaginary-time path integral for a relativistic spinless particle in an electromagnetic field, Commun. Math. Phys., 105 (1986), 239257.Google Scholar
[11] Takashi, Ichinose and Tetsuo, Tsuchida, On Kato’s inequality for the Weyl quantized relativistic Hamiltonian, Manuscripta Math., 76 (1992), 269280.Google Scholar
[12] Mark, Kac, Mathematical mechanism of phase transitions, 1966 Brandeis Lecture, pp. 242305, Gordon and Breach, New York (1968).Google Scholar
[13] Tosio, Kato, Schrödinger operators with singular potentials, Israel J. Math., 13 (1972), 135148.Google Scholar
[14] Dzh., L. Rogava, Error bounds for Trotter-type formulas for self-adjoint operators, Functional Analysis and Its Applications, 27 (1993), 217219.Google Scholar
[15] Barry, Simon, Functional Integration and Quantum Physics, Academic Press, London, 1979.Google Scholar
[16] Barry, Simon, Brownian motion, Lp properties of Schrödinger operators and the localization of binding, J. Funct. Anal., 35 (1980), 215229.Google Scholar