Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:03:05.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Trichothecene production and pathogenicity of Fusarium tumidum, a candidate bioherbicide for gorse and broom in New Zealand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2000

Louise MORIN
Affiliation:
Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand Present address: CRC for Weed Management Systems, CSIRO Entomology, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.
Alison F. GIANOTTI
Affiliation:
Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand
Denis R. LAUREN
Affiliation:
Hort-Research, Ruakura Research Centre, Private Bag 3123, Hamilton, New Zealand. E-mail: Louise.Morin@ento.csiro.au.
Get access

Abstract

The relationship between trichothecene production and pathogenicity was investigated for 29 isolates of Fusarium tumidum, a potential bioherbicide for gorse (Ulex europaeus) and broom (Cytisus scoparius) in New Zealand. All isolates originally derived from broom produced high levels of T-2 tetraol derivatives when grown on ground maize kernels and pearl barley grains, compared with isolates from gorse. Low amounts of scirpentriol derivatives were also produced by both groups of isolates. No nivalenol and deoxynivalenol derivatives were detected in any of the culture extracts. A subset of isolates cultured on gorse and broom tissue produced only small amounts of T-2 tetraol derivatives relative to the amounts produced in grain cultures. Overall, isolates from broom were more aggressive towards both hosts than isolates from gorse, but the pathogenicity of isolates was not correlated with their capacity to produce large amounts of T-2 tetraol derivatives in culture. Two isolates from gorse were highly aggressive towards both weeds. These isolates offer prospects for the development of a safe bioherbicide that could target two major weeds in New Zealand, as trichothecenes were not detected from them at the higher concentrations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The British Mycological Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)