Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T12:56:47.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Web Modules Linking Mechanics and Materials Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

David Roylance ,
C. H. Jenkins  and
S. K. Khanna
David Roylance
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, U.S.A., Email: roylance@mit.edu
C. H. Jenkins
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering Department, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD, 57701, U.S.A., Email: CJENKINS@taz.sdsmt.edu
S. K. Khanna
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering Department, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD, 57701, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

In 1996, the MIT subject 3.11 Mechanics of Materials in the Department of Materials Science and Engineering began using an experimental new textbook approach, written with a strongly increased emphasis on the materials aspects of the subject. It also included several topics such as finite element methods, fracture mechanics, and statistics that are not included in most traditional Mechanics of Materials texts. These nontraditional aspects were designed to fit the curriculum in Materials Science and Engineering, although admittedly Mechanics instructors in other departments and schools might not find all of them suitable for their own subjects. Further, a number of topics may be of interest in educational curricula and industrial practice outside traditional Mechanics subjects.

One approach to increasing the flexibility and adaptability of this materials-oriented text is to make discrete and coherent portions of it available as stand-alone, web-available modules. Instructors could then pick and choose among topics, and assemble a subject offering in whatever way they choose. It would also be possible for instructors of specialty engineering subjects, for instance bridge or aircraft design, to add modules on mechanics of materials aimed at their own needs.

A series of such modules are now being developed under a National Science Foundation Course, Curriculum and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) grant aimed at strengthening the links in the engineering curriculum between materials and mechanics. Each module is intended to be capable of standing alone, so that it will usually be unnecessary to work through other modules in order to use any particular one. This approach will be outlined and demonstrated, both as an approach to the specific topic of a mechanics-materials linkage, and as a possibility for more general implementation in distance learning.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 684: Symposium GG – Impacting Society Through Materials Science and Engineering Education , 2001 , GG6.9
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Beer, F.P. and Johnston, E.R., Mechanics of Materials, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1992.Google Scholar
2. Gere, J.M., Mechanics of Materials, 5th ed., Brooks-Cole, Pacific Grove, CA, 2001.Google Scholar
3. Timoshenko, S.P., History of Strength of Materials, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1953. Available from Dover Publications, New York, 1983.Google Scholar
4. Callister, W.D., Materials Science and Engineering – An Introduction, 3rd ed., J.Wiley, New York, 1994.Google Scholar
5. Shackelford, J.F., Introduction to Materials Science for Engineers, 4th ed., Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1996.Google Scholar
6. Roylance, D., Jenkins, C.H.M. and Dieter, G.E., “The Materials-Mechanics Linkage in the Engineering Curriculum,” Journal of Materials Education, Vol. 21, pp. 145–148, 1999.Google Scholar
7. Committee on Materials Science and Engineering, National Research Council, Materials Science and Engineering for the 1990s: Maintaining Competitiveness in the Age of Materials, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1989.Google Scholar
8. Roylance, D., Mechanics of Materials, J. Wiley, New York, 1996.Google Scholar
9. Stevens, F. et al. , User-Friendly Handbook for Project Evaluation: Science, Mathematics Engineering and Technology Education, Government Accounting Office, Program Accounting Issues, GAO/OCG-93-6TR, 1992. Available at http://www.ehr.nsf.gov/EHR/RED/EVAL/handbook/handbook.htm.Google Scholar